Discursive Representations of Social Support for Reproductive Decision-Making Among Victorian Women
- 5 Downloads
Social support is a significant, yet little understood, part of the sociocultural environment that impacts women’s reproductive decisions. A discourse analysis was conducted on twenty-three semi-structured interviews with women living in Victoria, Australia. The research identified and explored key interpretive repertoires and ideological dilemmas within the women’s narratives, to better understand the relationship between social support and reproductive decision-making. Two key themes were identified in the women’s narratives; expectations of social support, reflected in the interpretive repertoires “I feel lucky”, and “I don’t blame them”; and constructions of social support, reflected in “my choice, my decision” repertoire, and the gendered repertoire, “she’s open, he’s laid back”. Influenced by dominant social discourses related to women’s control over their bodies, and reproduction as taboo and “women’s business”, these repertoires reflect the constrained provision of social support from others, and simultaneously establish the importance of affirmation of individual choice as a meaningful experience of support for reproductive decision-making. The women’s discursive representations coexist and interact within ideological dilemmas that reflect the complexity of women’s lived experiences of social support and reproductive decision-making. These findings provide insight into women’s perceptions and experiences of social support for reproductive decision-making.
KeywordsReproduction Decision-making Reproductive decision-making Social support Women
This study was funded by the School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Billig, M. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Blieszner, R., & Roberto, K. A. (2004). Friendship across the life span: Reciprocity in individual and relationship development. In F. R. & K. L. Lang Fingerman (Eds), Growing together: Personal relationships across the life span. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–182.Google Scholar
- Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Golden, A. G., & Pomerantz, A. (2015). Interpretative repertoires that shape low-income African American women’s reproductive health care seeking: ‘Don’t Want to Know’ and ‘Taking Charge of Your Health’. Health Communication,30(8), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.898363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heaney, C. A., & Israel, B. A. (2008). Social networks and social support. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analytic practice. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Imeson, M., & McMurray, A. (1996). Couples’ experiences of infertility: A phenomenological study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(5), 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb02938.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Langford, C. P. H., Bowsher, J., Maloney, J. P., & Lillis, P. P. (1997). Social support: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing,25(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025095.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller, W. B. (1994). Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: A theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs,120(2), 223–258.Google Scholar
- Newman, M. L. (2013). Introduction. In M. L. Newman & N. A. Roberts (Eds.), Health and social relationships: The good, the bad, and the complicated (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Price, N. L., & Hawkins, K. (2007). A conceptual framework for the social analysis of reproductive health. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition,25(1), 24–36.Google Scholar
- Taylor, S. E. (2011). Social support: A review. In H. S. Friedman (Ed), The Oxford handbook of health psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 189–214.Google Scholar
- Woodward, K. (2003). Representations of motherhood. In S. Earle & G. Letherby (Eds.), Gender, identity & reproduction: Social perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar