Advertisement

Birds and Bees, the ‘R’ Word and Zuma’s p*nis: Censorship Avoidance Strategies in a South African Online Newspaper’s Comments Section

  • Lorato MokwenaEmail author
  • Felix Banda
Original Paper
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Although linguistic practices in online platforms continue to receive fair scholarly attention, limited research has been conducted on online censorship avoidance strategies in South Africa about online newspapers. We use notions of semiotic remediation on comments on two articles on a nude painting of former South African President Jacob Zuma in a popular South African online publication, SowetanLive, to show how the commentators creatively avoid censorship and to operationalise their right of freedom of expression. Particularly, we show the various ways commentators transform and recontexatualise existing semiotic affordances of punctuation marks, letters, digits, South African English, indigenous South African languages and cultural knowledge to achieve new and extended meanings while simultaneously avoiding censorship. This paper demonstrates that censorship strategies are mostly employed to comments related to: (1) racism; (2) gender identities and (3) sex. As extensive as these censorship strategies are, the potential inflammatory content is intentionally made to be decipherable by participants which problematises the concept of ‘censorship’. This paper argues that South Africa is to a large extent still a conservative country that grabbles with socio-political issues such as racism, gender identities, objectification of black bodies and so forth. However the readership of SowetanLive is finding ways to question such conservatism through online platforms and censorship avoidance strategies.

Keywords

Online newspaper comments Censorship avoidance Brett Murray Sex Racism SowetanLive Jacob Zuma 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The article is based on information gathered from an online newspaper which is deemed a public space therefore no informed consent was required. No real names were used in this article as all the participants have online usernames.

References

  1. Banda, F. (2016). Towards a democratisation of new media spaces in multilingual/multicultural Africa: A heteroglossic account of multilocal and multivoiced counter-hegemonic discourses in Zambian online news media. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 49(1), 105–127.Google Scholar
  2. Banda, F., & Jimaima, H. (2015). The semiotic ecology of linguistic landscapes in rural Zambia. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(5), 643–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, N. (2012). Zuma Painting Defaced To ‘Prevent Civil War’. http://mg.co.za/article/2012-05-23-zuma-painting-defaced-to-prevent-civil-war. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.
  4. Bolter, D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding media. Massachusetts: MIT.Google Scholar
  5. Centre for Civil Society. (2014). The Sowetan. Available at: https://ccs.ukzn.ac.za/default.asp?3,10,10,756.
  6. Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cresswell, C., Whitehead, K. A., & Durrheim, K. (2014). The anatomy of ‘race trouble’ in online interactions. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(14), 2512–2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davie, L. (2012). Sarah Baartman, At Rest at Last. Available at: https://www.southafrica.info/about/history/saartjie.htm#.VBQ-32Mxj2k.
  10. Diakopoulos, N., & Naaman, M. (2011). Towards quality discourse in online news comments. In Paper presented at the ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, March 19–23, in Hangzhou.Google Scholar
  11. Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Singer, J. B., & Vujnovic, M. (2008). Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond: An international comparative study of initiatives in online newspapers. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 326–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epprecht, M. (2013). Hungochani: The history of a dissident sexuality in southern Africa. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.Google Scholar
  13. Erjavec, K., & Kovačič, M. P. (2012). “You don’t understand, this is a new war!” Analysis of hate speech in news web sites’ comments. Mass Communication and Society, 15(6), 899–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hadland, A., Louw, E., Sesanti, S., & Wasserman, H. (2008). Power politics and identity in South African media. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
  15. Herring, S.C. (2012). Grammar and electronic communication. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia Of Applied Linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Hughey, M. W., & Daniels, J. (2013). Racist comments at online news sites: a methodological dilemma for discourse analysis. Media, Culture and Society, 35(3), 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knoetze, D. & Maphumulo, S. (2012). Why we did it- vandals. http://www.iol.co.za/pretoria-news/why-we-did-it-vandals-1.1304276. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.
  18. Manosevitch, E., & Walker, D. (2009). Reader comments to online opinion journalism: A space of public deliberation. International Symposium on Online Journalism, 10, 1–30.Google Scholar
  19. Mercury Reporters. (2010). Zuma admits to getting the chop. Independent Online. https://www.iol.co.za/news/politics/zuma-admits-to-getting-the-chop-484132. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.
  20. Prior, P. (2014). Semiotics. In Constant Leung & Brian Street (Eds.), The Routledge companion to English studies (pp. 160–173). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Prior, P., & Hengst, J. A. (2010). Introduction. In P. A. Prior & J. A. Hengst (Eds.), Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice (pp. 1–23). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prior, P., Hengst, J., Roozen, K., & Shipka, J. (2006). ‘I’ll be the sun’: From reported speech to semiotic remediation practices. Text and Talk, 26, 733–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saint-Aubin, A. (2002). A grammar of black masculinity: A body of science. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 10(3), 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shimizu, C. P. (1999). Master-slave sex acts: Mandingo and the race/sex paradox. Wide Angle, 21(4), 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Southern, N. (2011). Political opposition and the challenges of a dominant party system: The democratic alliance in South Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 29(3), 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sowetan Live Rate Card. (2011). Available at: https://www.wesellwebads.com/live/sowetanlive2011.pdf.
  27. Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication—Social interaction and the internet. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Timeslive. (2016). Get to know President Jacob Zuma’s children. https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2016-05-26-get-to-know-president-jacob-zumas-children/. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.
  29. Weber, P. (2014). Discussions in the comments section: Factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers’ reader comments. New Media & Society, 16(6), 941–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. World Editors Forum. (2013). Online comment moderation emerging best practices. https://www.wan-ifra.org/sites/default/files/field_article_file/AFPF_ENG_online_excerpts_final.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linguistics DepartmentUniversity of the Western CapeBellvilleSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations