To Tell or not to Tell? Parents’ Reluctance to Talking About Conceiving Their Children Using Medically Assisted Reproduction
- 57 Downloads
While more and more researchers are investigating the effects of disclosing conceptions achieved through heterologous fertilization, even couples who use homologous medically-assisted reproduction (MAR) often do not tell their relatives and children how they conceived, possibly because they find it embarrassing. The present study explores the perception of stigma, and the reticence of Italian couples resorting to homologous MAR when speaking about conception. Interviews were conducted with 30 participants recruited through a fertility clinic at a public hospital in northern Italy, and through social media and snowball sampling. Content analysis was used to identify respondents’ various attitudes to talking about their MAR experience. Their reluctance to tell their relatives and children about their conceiving experience may reflect, but also perpetuate the social stigma associated with in vitro fertilization. Further research and scientific dissemination campaigns are needed to emphasize the importance of normalizing and sharing these experiences within the family—addressing not only heterologous, but also homologous MAR—especially in the more traditional cultural and legal settings, such as Italy.
KeywordsMedically-assisted reproduction Stigma Disclosure Qualitative research Children
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Baiocco, R., Santamaria, F., Ioverno, S., Fontanesi, L., Baumgartner, E., Laghi, F., et al. (2015). Lesbian mother families and gay father families in Italy: Family functioning, dyadic satisfaction, and child well-being. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12(3), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0185-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bourne, K. (2002). Sometimes it takes three to make a baby: Explaining egg donor conception to young children. East Melbourne: Melbourne IVF.Google Scholar
- Ernst, J., Mehnert, A., Dietz, A., Hornemann, B., & Esser, P. (2017). Perceived stigmaization and its impact on quality of life—Results from a large register-based study including breast, colon, prostate and lung cancer patients. BMC Cancer, 17(1), 741. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3742-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Flamigni, C., & Borini, A. (2012). He(s)terologous fertilization. Rom: L’asino d’oro.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.Google Scholar
- Iudici, A. (2015). Health promotion in school: Theory, practice and clinical implications. New york: Nova.Google Scholar
- Papp, P. (1993). The worm in the bud: Secrets between parents and children. In E. Imber-Black (Ed.), Secrets in families and family therapy (pp. 66–85). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Smart, L., & Wegner, D. M. (2000). The hidden costs of hidden stigma. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 220–242). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- WHO. (2001). Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. Report of a meeting on “Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction” held at WHO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland 17–21 September 2001.Google Scholar