Advertisement

Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 45–56 | Cite as

An Examination of Men’s Wealth and Age Disparate Partnerships in South Africa: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey

  • Gavin GeorgeEmail author
  • Brendan Maughan-Brown
  • Sean Beckett
  • Meredith Evans
Original Paper
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

Evidence indicates that age-disparate sexual partnerships increase a young woman’s risk of HIV acquisition. Studies suggest that age-disparate relationships are fuelled by socio-economic disparities, with economically disadvantaged young women in sexual relationships with comparatively wealthier older men. Limited data exists on the socio-economic status of men in age-disparate relationships relative to men in age-similar relationships. This study explores whether men in age-disparate and similar-aged partnerships differ on socio-economic indicators. A 2012 nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 10,034 men was analysed. The sample was restricted to sexually active men older than 24 years old (N = 1330). The survey included information on the men’s three most recent sexual partners and three measures of socio-economic status. Multiple regression models were used to compare the socio-economic status of men in age-similar partnerships to men in age-disparate partnerships. Just less than half (44.6%) of the men were involved in only age-similar partnerships. The multiple regression results indicate that household wealth, access to essential services and employment status were not significantly associated with an increased likelihood of men engaging in age-disparate partnerships. Additionally, the relationship between men’s wealth and age disparate partnering did not vary according to geographical context. Men engaging in age-disparate partnerships do not differ with regards to their socio-economic status from men in partnerships with women of a similar age. Whilst economic disparity may prevail between males and females within age-disparate relationships, this study reveals that the men in these relationships are not economically advantaged over men in age-similar relationships.

Keywords

Age-disparate sex Sugar daddies Older men Intergenerational relationships Socio-economic status 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the participants in the survey, as well as the study PIs for giving us access to these data.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The University of the Witwatersrand’s Human Research Ethics Committee and the Institutional Review Board of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health granted ethical approval for the study, including all consent procedures. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

All participants provided written informed consent. The University of the Witwatersrand provided direction on participation by children (participants under the age of 18 years). For participants aged 16 and 17 years, both the child’s own consent and consent of a parent or guardian were required.

Supplementary material

12119_2018_9561_MOESM1_ESM.docx (25 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 26 kb)

References

  1. Akullian, A., Bershteyn, A., Klein, D., Vandormael, A., Bärnighausen, T., & Tanser, F. (2017). Sexual partnership age pairings and risk of HIV acquisition in rural South Africa. AIDS (London, England), 31(12), 1755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balkus, J. E., Nair, G., Montgomery, E. T., Mishra, A., Palanee-Phillips, T., Ramjee, G., et al. (2015). Age-disparate partnerships and risk of HIV-1 acquisition among South African women participating in the VOICE Trial. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 70(2), 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapman, R., White, R. G., Shafer, L. A., Pettifor, A., Mugurungi, O., Ross, D., et al. (2010). Do behavioural differences help to explain variations in HIV prevalence in adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa? Tropical Medicine & International Health, 15(5), 554–566.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02483.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Oliveira, T., Kharsany, A. B., Gräf, T., Cawood, C., Khanyile, D., Grobler, A., et al. (2017). Transmission networks and risk of HIV infection in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A community-wide phylogenetic study. The Lancet HIV, 4(1), e41–e50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dellar, R. C., Dlamini, S., & Karim, Q. A. (2015). Adolescent girls and young women: Key populations for HIV epidemic control. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 18(2S1), 64–70.Google Scholar
  6. Dunkle, K. L., Jewkes, R., Nduna, M., Jama, N., Levin, J., Sikweyiya, Y., et al. (2007). Transactional sex with casual and main partners among young South African men in the rural Eastern Cape: Prevalence, predictors, and associations with gender-based violence. Social Science and Medicine, 65(6), 1235–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans, M., Risher, K., Zungu, N., Shisana, O., Moyo, S., Celentano, D. D., et al. (2016). Age-disparate sex and HIV risk for young women from 2002 to 2012 in South Africa. Young, 2, 5.Google Scholar
  8. Gregson, S., Nyamukapa, C. A., Garnett, G. P., Mason, P. R., Zhuwau, T., Caraël, M., et al. (2002). Sexual mixing patterns and sex-differentials in teenage exposure to HIV infection in rural Zimbabwe. The Lancet, 359(9321), 1896–1903.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08780-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harling, G., Newell, M.-L., Tanser, F., Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Bärnighausen, T. (2014). Do age-disparate relationships drive HIV incidence in young women? Evidence from a population cohort in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 66(4), 443–451.  https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000000198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harling, G., Tanser, F., Mutevedzi, T., & Bärnighausen, T. (2015). Assessing the validity of respondents’ reports of their partners’ ages in a rural South African population-based cohort. British Medical Journal Open, 5(3), e005638.Google Scholar
  11. Harrison, A., Colvin, C. J., Kuo, C., Swartz, A., & Lurie, M. (2015). Sustained high HIV incidence in young women in Southern Africa: social, behavioral, and structural factors and emerging intervention approaches. Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 12(2), 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Idele, P., Gillespie, A., Porth, T., Suzuki, C., Mahy, M., Kasedde, S., et al. (2014). Epidemiology of HIV and AIDS among adolescents: Current status, inequities, and data gaps. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 66, S144–S153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. (2015). UNAIDS terminology guidelines. Geneva: UNAIDS.Google Scholar
  14. Kalichman, S. C., Simbayi, L. C., Kaufman, M., Cain, D., & Jooste, S. (2007). Alcohol use and sexual risks for HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic review of empirical findings. Prevention Science, 8(2), 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karim, Q. A., Baxter, C., & Birx, D. (2017). Prevention of HIV in adolescent girls and young women: Key to an AIDS-free generation. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 75, S17–S26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaufman, C. E., & Stavrou, S. E. (2004). ‘Bus fare please’: The economics of sex and gifts among young people in urban South Africa. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 6(5), 377–391.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050410001680492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelly, R. J., Gray, R. H., Sewankambo, N. K., Serwadda, D., Wabwire-Mangen, F., Lutalo, T., et al. (2003). Age differences in sexual partners and risk of HIV-1 infection in rural Uganda. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 32(4), 446–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leclerc-Madlala, S. (2004). Transactional sex and the pursuit of modernity. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  19. Leclerc-Madlala, S. (2008). Age-disparate and intergenerational sex in southern Africa: The dynamics of hypervulnerability. AIDS, 22, S17–S25.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000341774.86500.53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luke, N. (2003). Age and economic asymmetries in the sexual relationships of adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa. Studies in Family Planning, 34(2), 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maughan-Brown, B., Evans, M., & George, G. (2016). Sexual behaviour of men and women within age-disparate partnerships in South Africa: Implications for young women’s HIV risk. PLoS ONE, 11(8), e0159162.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maughan-Brown, B., George, G., Beckett, S., Evans, M., Lewis, L., Cawood, C., et al. (2018). HIV risk among adolescent girls and young women in age-disparate partnerships: Evidence from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 78(2), 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maughan-Brown, B., Kenyon, C., & Lurie, M. N. (2014). Partner age differences and concurrency in South Africa: implications for HIV-infection risk among young women. AIDS and Behavior, 18(12), 2469–2476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maughan-Brown, B., & Venkataramani, A. S. (2011). Measuring concurrent partnerships: potential for underestimation in UNAIDS recommended method. AIDS, 25(12), 1549–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naicker, N., Kharsany, A. B., Werner, L., van Loggerenberg, F., Mlisana, K., Garrett, N., et al. (2015). Risk factors for HIV acquisition in high risk women in a generalised epidemic setting. AIDS and Behavior, 19(7), 1305–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. PEPFAR. (2016). DREAMS innovation challenge. https://www.pepfar.gov/documents/organization/247602.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2018.
  27. Pettifor, A. E., Rees, H. V., Kleinschmidt, I., Steffenson, E. A., MacPhail, C., Hlongwa-Madikizela, L., et al. (2005). Young people’s sexual health in South Africa: HIV prevalence and sexual behaviors from a nationally representative household survey. AIDS.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000183129.16830.06.Google Scholar
  28. Ritchwood, T. D., Hughes, J. P., Jennings, L., MacPhail, C., Williamson, B., Selin, A., et al. (2016). Characteristics of age-discordant partnerships associated with HIV risk among young South African women (HPTN 068). Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 72(4), 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schaefer, R., Gregson, S., Eaton, J. W., Mugurungi, O., Rhead, R., Takaruza, A., et al. (2017). Age-disparate relationships and HIV incidence in adolescent girls and young women: Evidence from Zimbabwe. AIDS (London, England), 31(10), 1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shisana, O., Rehle, T., Simbayi, L., Zuma, K., Jooste, S., Zungu, N., et al. (2014). South African national HIV prevalence, incidence and behaviour survey, 2012. Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  31. Stoebenau, K., Heise, L., Wamoyi, J., & Bobrova, N. (2016). Revisiting the understanding of “transactional sex” in sub-Saharan Africa: A review and synthesis of the literature. Social Science and Medicine, 168, 186–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Street, R. A., Reddy, T., & Ramjee, G. (2016). The generational effect on age disparate partnerships and the risk for human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted infections acquisition. International Journal of STD and AIDS, 27(9), 746–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Toska, E., Cluver, L. D., Boyes, M., Pantelic, M., & Kuo, C. (2015). From ‘sugar daddies’ to ‘sugar babies’: Exploring a pathway among age-disparate sexual relationships, condom use and adolescent pregnancy in South Africa. Sexual Health, 12(1), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zembe, Y. Z., Townsend, L., Thorson, A., & Ekström, A. M. (2013). “Money talks, bullshit walks” interrogating notions of consumption and survival sex among young women engaging in transactional sex in post-apartheid South Africa: A qualitative enquiry. Globalization and Health, 9(1), 28.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zuma, K., Shisana, O., Rehle, T. M., Simbayi, L. C., Jooste, S., Zungu, N., et al. (2016). New insights into HIV epidemic in South Africa: Key findings from the national HIV prevalence, incidence and behaviour survey, 2012. African Journal of AIDS Research, 15(1), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gavin George
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brendan Maughan-Brown
    • 2
  • Sean Beckett
    • 1
  • Meredith Evans
    • 3
  1. 1.Health Economics and HIV and AIDS Research Division (HEARD)University of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa
  2. 2.Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit (SALDRU), Department of EconomicsUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations