Urban Migration of Sexual Minorities in the United States: Myth or Reality?
It is often suggested that sexual minorities in the United States, especially gay men and lesbian women, move to urban areas at a higher rate than heterosexual individuals. Existing analyses of this claim are limited for one or more reasons, such as only examining patterns of current residential context without considering movement between contexts or only examining movement for partnered sexual minorities. Utilizing the General Social Survey, a probability survey of the US adult population, we compare patterns of residential context in childhood and adulthood for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual individuals. Initial findings do suggest that gay and lesbian individuals are slightly more likely than heterosexual individuals to reside in more urban areas as adults. However, this difference is explained away by the more urban childhood contexts of gay or lesbian individuals relative to heterosexual individuals. In sum, we find no robust sexuality effect on urban migration.
KeywordsSexuality Migration Urban Rural Gay Lesbian Residential context
The authors did not receive funding to conduct this research.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Author Scheitle declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Guthrie declares that she has no conflict of interest.
The data used in this research come from the General Social Survey (GSS), which is publicly available at gss.norc.org. Informed consent is obtained from all GSS participants. This research is in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Bronski, M. (2011). A queer history of the United States. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- D’Emilio, J. (1989). Gay politics and community in San Francisco since World War II. In M. B. Duberman, M. Vicinus, & G. Chauncey (Eds.), Hidden from history: Reclaiming the gay & lesbian past (pp. 456–473). New York, NY: New American Library.Google Scholar
- Durso, L. E., & Gates, G. J. (2012). Serving our youth: Findings from a national survey of service providers working with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. Los Angeles: The Williams Institute with True Colors Fund and the Palette Fund.Google Scholar
- Gorman-Murray, A., Pini, B., & Bryant, L. (Eds.). (2013). Sexuality, rurality and geography. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Gray, M. L. (2009). Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Preston, D. B., & D’Augelli, A. R. (2013). The challenges of being a rural gay man: Coping with stigma. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Seidman, S. (2002). Beyond the closet: The transformation of gay and lesbian life. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Smith, T. W., Davern, M., Freese, J., & Hout, M. (2017). In T. W. Smith, P. V. Marsden & M. Hout, NORC (Eds.), General social surveys, 1972–2016 (machine-readable data file) (3,689 p). Chicago: NORC. 1 data file (62,466 logical records) and 1 codebook.Google Scholar
- Wimark, T. (2014). Beyond bright city lights: The migration patterns of gay men and lesbians. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University, Stockholm.Google Scholar