Advertisement

Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 1527–1541 | Cite as

When HIV Figures in Family Life: Exploring the Relational Reach of Serodiscordance

  • Christy Newman
  • Asha Persson
  • Jeanne Ellard
Original Paper

Abstract

Social research has been building an increasingly powerful challenge to the public health framing of HIV serodiscordance as pertaining only to sexual transmission risk within couple relationships. Aligned with this critique, our qualitative research with couples of mixed HIV status in New South Wales, Australia, revealed that serodiscordance held relational and cultural meanings which extended beyond the couple domain, encompassing a range of other relationships and issues, particularly those pertaining to families. A deductive thematic analysis of the data on families within these interviews revealed two major themes, disclosing serodiscordance to extended family members, and pursuing serodiscordant parenthood, which presented different challenges for same-sex and opposite-sex couples. We conclude that, despite incredible advances in the medical management of HIV, there continue to be diverse implications of serodiscordance within both intimate and extended family relationships. Understanding the implications of disclosing serodiscordance beyond the couple relationship, and recognising the complex intersections between the public and private dimensions of serodiscordance, offer promising ways forward in supporting families affected by HIV in settings which are culturally comparable to Australia.

Keywords

HIV infection Serodiscordance Family relationships Sexualities Qualitative research Australia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the participants who so generously shared their stories so that others could learn from their experiences of serodiscordant relationships. This work was supported by the New South Wales Ministry of Health. The Centre for Social Research in Health receives funding from UNSW Arts and Social Sciences, and from the Australian Government Department of Health. The Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations receives funding from the Australian Government Department of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Bell, S., Aggleton, P., & Slavin, S. (2016). Negotiating trust and struggling for control: everyday narratives of unwanted disclosure of HIV status among people with HIV in Australia. Health Sociology Review.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1271282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blais, M., Fernet, M., Proulx-Boucher, K., Lapointe, N., Samson, J., Otis, J., et al. (2014). Family quality of life in families affected by HIV: the perspective of HIV-positive mothers. AIDS Care, 26(sup1), S21–S28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2014.906551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bor, R., Miller, R., & Goldman, E. (1993). HIV/AIDS and the family: A review of research in the first decade. Journal of Family Therapy, 15, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in qualitative psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4(2), 167–182.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11339939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, M. (2015). After the clinic? Researching sexual health technology in context. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 17(4), 398–411.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.928371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeMatteo, D., Wells, L. M., Salter Goldie, R., & King, S. M. (2002). The ‘family’ context of HIV: A need for comprehensive health and social policies. AIDS Care, 14(2), 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dempsey, D., & Lindsay, J. (2014). Families, relationships and intimate life (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fielden, S. J., Sheckter, L., Chapman, G. E., Alimenti, A., Forbes, J. C., Sheps, S., et al. (2006). Growing up: Perspectives of children, families and service providers regarding the needs of older children with perinatally-acquired HIV. AIDS Care - Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, 18(8), 1050–1053.Google Scholar
  10. Fransen-Dos Santos, R., & Guarinieri, M. (2017). Men living with HIV in serodiscordant relationships who desire a child/children. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 20(Suppl 1), 34–35.  https://doi.org/10.7448/ias.20.2.21749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grulich, A., Guy, R., Amin, J., Schmidt, H., Selvey, C., Holden, J., et al. (2018). Rapid reduction in HIV diganoses after targeted PrEP implementation in NSW, Australia. Paper presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, Massachusetts, March 4–7.Google Scholar
  12. Holt, M. (2011). Gay men and ambivalence about ‘gay community’: From gay community attachment to personal communities. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 13(8), 857–871.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2011.581390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelly, C., Lohan, M., Alderdice, F., & Spence, D. (2011). Negotiation of risk in sexual relationships and reproductive decision-making amongst HIV sero-different couples. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 13(7), 815–827.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2011.563865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McCarthy, J. R. (2012). The powerful relational language of ‘family’: Togetherness, belonging and personhood. The Sociological Review, 60(1), 68–90.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02045.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McDonald, K. (2011). ‘The old-fashioned way’: Conception and sex in serodiscordant relationships after ART. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 13(10), 1119–1133.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2011.607242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Montgomery, C. M., Gafos, M., Lees, S., Morar, N. S., Mweemba, O., Ssali, A., et al. (2010). Re-framing microbicide acceptability: Findings from the MDP301 trial. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 12(6), 649–662.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691051003736261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking family practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murphy, D. (2015). Gay men pursuing parenthood via surrogacy: Reconfiguring KINSHIP. Kensington, NSW: NewSouth Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Murphy, P. J., Hevey, D., O’Dea, S., Rathaille, N. N., & Mulcahy, F. (2016). Serostatus disclosure, stigma resistance, and identity management among HIV-Positive gay men in Ireland. Qualitative Health Research, 26(11), 1459–1472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315606687 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. NAPWHA (2017). Breastfeeding & HIV. Accessed 3 May 2018.Google Scholar
  21. Newman, C. E., Persson, A., & Ellard, J. (2016). Pills, providers and partners: Exploring trust among serodiscordant couples in Australia. In A. Persson & S. D. Hughes (Eds.), Cross-cultural perspectives on couples with mixed HIV status: Beyond positive/negative (pp. 265–276). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Pequegnat, W., & Bell, C. (Eds.). (2012). Family and HIV/AIDS: Cultural and contextual issues in prevention and treatment. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Persson, A. (2012). Notes on the concepts of ‘serodiscordance’ and ‘risk’ in couples with mixed HIV status. Global Public Health, 8(2), 209–220.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2012.729219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Persson, A. (2013). Non/infectious corporealities: Tensions in the biomedical era of ‘HIV normalisation’. Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(7), 1065–1079.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Persson, A., Ellard, J., Brown, G., Newman, C., & Prestage, G. (2016). You, Me & HIV: The serodiscordant couples study. Sydney: Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Persson, A., Ellard, J., & Newman, C. (2015). Bridging the HIV divide: Stigma, stories and serodiscordant sexuality in the biomedical age. Sexuality and Culture.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9316-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Persson, A., & Hughes, S. D. (Eds.). (2016). Cross-cultural perspectives on couples with mixed HIV status: Beyond positive/negative. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Persson, A., Newman, C. E., & Ellard, J. (2017a). Breaking binaries? biomedicine and serostatus borderlands among couples with mixed HIV status. Medical Anthropology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2017.1298594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Persson, A., Newman, C. E., Hamilton, M., Bryant, J., Wallace, J., & Valentine, K. (2017b). Families living with blood-borne viruses: The case for extending the concept of ‘serodiscordance’. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, 2017, 10.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4352783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Race, K. (2012). Framing responsibility. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 9(3), 327–338.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-012-9375-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robson, E., Ansell, N., Huber, U. S., Gould, W. T. S., & van Blerk, L. (2006). Young caregivers in the context of the HIV/AIDS pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa. Population, Space and Place, 12(2), 93–111.  https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rotheram-Borus, M., Flannery, D., Rice, E., & Lester, P. (2005). Families living with HIV. AIDS Care, 17(8), 978–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Rice, E., Comulada, W. S., Best, K., & Li, L. (2012). Comparisons of HIV-affected and non-HIV-affected families over time. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 7(4), 299–314.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2012.713532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rule, J., & Slavin, S. (2017). Seeking seroharmony: changing conceptualisations of serodifference and serostatus. In A. Persson & S. D. Hughes (Eds.), Cross-cultural perspectives on couples with mixed HIV Status: Beyond positive/negative (pp. 37–54). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sherr, L., Cluver, L. D., Betancourt, T. S., Kellerman, S. E., Richter, L. M., & Desmond, C. (2014). Evidence of impact: health, psychological and social effects of adult HIV on children. AIDS, 28(Suppl 3), S251–S259.  https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0000000000000327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. The Kirby Institute (2017). HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: Annual Surveillance Report 2017. Sydney: The Kirby Institute, UNSW NSW 2052.Google Scholar
  37. Truong, H.-H. M., Chen, Y.-H., Grasso, M., Robertson, T., Tao, L., Fatch, R., et al. (2016). HIV serodisclosure and sexual behavior during international travel. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 43(7), 459–464.  https://doi.org/10.1097/olq.0000000000000464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. UNAIDS (2012). Treatment 2015. Geneva: UNAIDS: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.Google Scholar
  39. Wall, K., & Gouveia, R. (2014). Changing meanings of family in personal relationships. Current Sociology, 62(3), 352–373.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113518779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. WHO. (2010). Guidelines on HIV and infant feeding 2010: Principles and recommendations for infant feeding in the context of HIV and a summary of evidence. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
  41. Yu, Y. J., Li, X., Qiao, S., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Family relations in the context of HIV/AIDS in Southwest China. AIDS Care, 28(10), 1261–1268.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1173641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Social Research in HealthUNSW SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Federation of AIDS OrganisationsSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations