Procuring Sexual Services: Evidencing Masculinity Diversity and Difference Through Sex Work Research

  • Philip Birch
  • Eileen Baldry
  • Victoria H. Hartley
Original Paper
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Masculinities theorising has promoted a traditional view of maleness, conceptualising it as being dominant, successful and non-emotional; that is hegemonic masculinity. Contemporary work on men and their behaviour, recognising need and emotions, has been classified as subordinate to hegemonic masculinity. We examine the procurement of sexual services by a cohort of heterosexual men in New South Wales, Australia arguing that our findings support contemporary masculinity writings. Our analysis suggests that men seek and obtain intimacy and emotional experiences through procurement of sex, while at the same time reflecting some hegemonic masculine characteristics. We conclude by arguing that research with men who procure sexual services provides new insights into masculinities theorising recognising difference and diversity in what it is to be a man in the twenty-first century.

Keywords

Masculinity Procurement of sexual services Hegemony Emotions Intimacy 

References

  1. Anderson, E. (2005). Orthodox and inclusive masculinity: Competing masculinities among heterosexual men in a feminized terrain. Sociological Perspectives, 48(3), 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (2008). Inclusive masculinity in a fraternal setting. Men and Masculinities, 10(5), 604–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. (2010). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Beureau of Statistics (ABS). (2013). Cultural diversity on Australia: Reflecting a Nation: Stories from the 2011 census. Accessed at: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/2071.0main+features902012-2013. Viewed February 21, 2017.
  5. Bandes, S. A. (2009). Victims, closure, and the sociology of emotion. Law & Contemporary Problems, 72, 1–27.Google Scholar
  6. Barker, G. (2005). Dying to be men. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barry, K. (1995). The prostitution of sexuality: The global exploitation of women. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Birch, P. (2015). Why men buy sex: Examining sex worker clients. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Birch, P., & Ireland, J. L. (2015). Making sense of men’s procurement of sexual services: Introducing the MAPSS model. Journal of Forensic Practice, 17(1), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Charteris-Black, J., & Seale, C. (2009). Men and emotion talk: Evidence from the experience of illness. Gender & Language, 3(1), 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coston, B. M., & Kimmel, M. (2012). Seeing privilege where it isn’t: Marginalized masculinities and the intersectionality of privilege. Journal of Social Issues, 68(1), 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Counselling and Wellness Centre, University of Florida (n.d.). Types of Intimacy. Accessed at: http://www.counseling.ufl.edu/cwc/types-of-intimacy.aspx Viewed on March 13, 2017.
  16. Demetriou, D. Z. (2001). Connell’s concept of hegemonic masculinity: A critique. Theory & Society, 30(3), 337–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fulcher, J., & Scott, J. (2009). Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, R. (2008). Applied social research: Planning, designing and conducting real-world research. Melbourne: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
  19. Hearn, J. (1992). Men in the public eye. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hearn, J., Pringle, K., Müller, U., Oleksy, E., Lattu, E., Chernova, J., et al. (2002). Critical studies on men in ten European countries: The state of academic research. Men and Masculinities, 4(4), 380–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hearn, J., Pringle, K., Müller, U., Oleksy, E., Lattu, E., Chernova, J., et al. (2003). ‘Critical studies on men in ten European countries. Men & Masculinities, 5(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holmes, M. (2015). Men’s emotions: Heteromasculinity, emotional reflexivity, and intimate relationships. Men and Masculinities, 18(2), 176–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jeffreys, S. (1997). The idea of prostitution. North Melbourne: Spinifex Press.Google Scholar
  24. Joseph, L. J., & Black, P. (2012). Who’s the man? Fragile masculinities, consumer masculinities, and the profiles of sex work clients. Men and Masculinities, 15(5), 486–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimmel, M. S., & Kaufman, M. (1993). The new men’s movement: Retreat and regression with America’s weekend warriors. Gender Issues, 13(2), 3–21.Google Scholar
  26. Lawler, E. J. & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual review of sociology, 25, 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacKinnon, C. (1990). Confronting the liberal lies about prostitution. In D. Leidholdt & J. Raymond (Eds.), The sexual liberals and the attack on feminism. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  28. Milrod, C., & Weitzer, R. (2012). The intimacy prism: Emotional management amongst the clients of escorts. Men and Masculinities, 15(5), 447–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montes, V. (2013). The role of emotions in the construction of masculinity: Guatemalan migrant men, transnational migration, and family relations. Gender & Society, 27(4), 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Monto, M. A., & McRee, J. N. (2005). A comparison of the male customers of female street prostitutes with national samples of men. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(5), 505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Connell Davidson, J. (1998). Prostitution, power and freedom. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Pease, B. (2012). The politics of gendered emotions: Disrupting men’s emotional investment in privilege. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 47(1), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanders, T. (2008a). Paying for pleasure: Men who buy sex. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Sanders, T. (2008b). Male sexual scripts intimacy, sexuality and pleasure in the purchase of commercial sex. Sociology, 42(3), 400–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott, J., & Marshall, G. (2009). A dictionary of sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seidler, V. J. (1991). The moral limits of modernity: Love, inequality and oppression. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seidler, V. J. (1994). Recovering the self: Morality and social theory. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  38. Seidler, V. J. (1997). Man enough: Embodying masculinities. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Seidler, V. J. (1998). Masculinity, violence and emotional life (pp. 193–210). Emotions in social life: Critical themes and contemporary issues.Google Scholar
  40. Seidler, V. J. (2007). Masculinities, bodies, and emotional life. Men and Masculinities, 10(1), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stroller, R. J. (1975). Perversion: The erotic form of hatred. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  42. Talbot, K., & Quayle, M. (2010). The perils of being a nice guy: Contextual variation in five young women’s constructions of acceptable hegemonic and alternative masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 13(2), 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner, J. H. & Stets, J. E. (2006) Sociological theories of human emotions. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Winick, C. (1962). Prostitutes’ clients perception of the prostitute and of themselves. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 8(4), 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Sciences and PsychologyUniversity of Western SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Ashworth Research CentreMersey Health CareLiverpoolUK
  3. 3.School of Social SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Forensic Centre, School of PsychologyUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations