Advertisement

Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 247–269 | Cite as

Adult-Child Sex and the Demands of Virtuous Sexual Morality

  • Agustin Malón
Original Paper

Abstract

This article is the continuation of a previous analysis of the usual arguments—lack of consent, exploitation and harm—used to evaluate sexual experiences between adults and children from general moral principles. It has been suggested that those arguments were insufficient to condemn all adult-child sexual experiences, and that it would be of interest to study others that come from a specific sexual morality based on a more complex and transcendent conception of human eroticism and sexual conduct. This paper develops three different arguments against adult-child sex from this perspective, a view which, while not rejecting the Kantian and utilitarian approaches, complements and transforms them with a virtue ethic that questions not only the permissibility of certain acts but also their moral desirability under this frame of reference. This helps us to clarify the scientific discourse on adult-child sex and directs us to the importance of attending to the educational dimension of this moral problem.

Keywords

Children Sexual abuse Sexual morality Pedophilia Sexual consent Sex education 

References

  1. Archard, D. (1998). Sexual consent. Boulder: WestviewPress.Google Scholar
  2. Archard, D. (2004). Children, rights and childhood. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Baber, H. E. (1987). How bad is rape? Hipatia, 2(2), 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belliotti, R. A. (1993). Good sex. Perspectives on sexual ethics. Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  5. Benatar, D. (2002). Two views of sexual ethics: Promiscuity, pedophilia, and rape. Public Affairs Quarterly, 16(3), 191–201.Google Scholar
  6. Benn, P. (1999). Is sex morally special? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 16(3), 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., et al. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335–350. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boutellier, H. (2004). The safety utopia. Contemporary discontent and desire as to crime and punishment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Brongersma, E. (1986). Loving boys (Vol. I). Elmhurst: Global Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Brongersma, E. (1990). Loving boys (Vol. II). Elmhurst: Global Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Bullough, V. L. (1990). History of adult human sexual behavior with children and adolescents in western society. In J. R. Feierman (Ed.), Pedophilia: Biosocial dimensions (pp. 69–90). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bullough, E., & Bullough, B. (1996). Problems of research into adult/child sexual interaction. Issues in Child Abuse Accusations, 8. http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume8/j8_2_1.htm.
  13. Card, C. (2002). What’s wrong with adult-child sex? Journal of Social Philosophy, 33(2), 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carr, D. (1991). Educating the virtues. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Clegg, S. (1994). Studying child sexual abuse: Morality or science? Radical Philosophy, 66, 31–39.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, Y. (1964). The transition from childhood to adolescence. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  17. Delgado, R. (1996). Statutory rape laws. Does it make sense to enforce them in an increasingly permissive society? No: Selective enforcement targets “unpopular” men. ABA Journal, 82, 87.Google Scholar
  18. Diamond, M. (1990). Selected cross-generational sexual behavior in traditional Hawai’i: A sexological ethnography. In J. R. Feierman (Ed.), Pedophilia: Biosocial dimensions (pp. 422–443). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eglinton, J. Z. (1964). Greek love. New York: Oliver Layton Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ehman, R. (1984). Adult-child sex. In R. Baker & F. Elliston (Eds.), Philosophy and sex (pp. 431–446). New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  21. Ehman, R. (2000). What really is wrong with pedophilia? Public Affairs Quarterly, 14(2), 129–140.Google Scholar
  22. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1971). Love and hate. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1956). From generation to generation. Age groups and social structure. London: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Epstein, D., & Sears, J. T. (1999). A dangerous knowing: Sexuality, pedagogy and popular culture. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  25. Ericksen, J. A. (2000). Sexual liberation’s last frontier. Society, 37, 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Farson, R. (1974). Birthrights. A bill of rights for children. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
  27. Feinberg, J. (1984). The moral limits of the criminal law I. Harm to others. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ferenczi, S. (1949). Confusion of the tongues between the adults and the child (the language of tenderness and of passion). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 30, 225–230.Google Scholar
  29. Finkelhor, D. (1979). What’s wrong with sex between adults and children? Ethics and the problem of sexual abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49(4), 692–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Finkelhor, D. (1986). A sourcebook on child sexual abuse. Beberly Hills: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Fleischhauer, J., & Hollersen, W. (2010). The sexual revolution and children: How the left took things too far. Spiegel Online. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-sexual-revolution-and-children-how-the-left-took-things-too-far-a-702679.html.
  32. Fleischhauer-Hardt, H., & McBride, W. (1979). ¡A ver! [Show me!]. Salamanca: Lóguez Ediciones.Google Scholar
  33. Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1952). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  34. Foucault, M. (1993). Historia de la sexualidad II. El uso de los placeres [The history of sexuality II. The use of pleasure]. Siglo XXI: Madrid.Google Scholar
  35. Frayser, S. G. (1985). Varieties of sexual experience. An anthropological perspective on human sexuality. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
  36. Frayser, S. G. (1994). Defining normal childhood sexuality: An anthropological approach. Annual Review of Sex Research, 5, 173–217.Google Scholar
  37. Frye, M. (1984). Critique (to Ehman, “adult-child sex”, 1984). In R. Baker & F. Elliston (Eds.), Philosophy and sex (pp. 447–455). New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  38. Goldman, A. (1980). Plain sex. In A. Soble (Ed.), The philosophy of sex: Contemporary readings (pp. 119–138). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  39. Gooren, J. (2014). ‘Pre-adults’ having ‘casual’ sex with no strings attached? Teenage sexual activity and Dutch criminal law. Sexuality and Culture, 18(2), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Graupner, H. (1999). Love versus abuse: Crossgenerational sexual relations of minors—A gay rights issue? Journal of Homosexuality, 37(4), 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Graupner, H. (2000). Sexual consent: The criminal law in Europe and overseas. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29(5), 415–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gray, R. (1980). Sex and sexual perversion. In A. Soble (Ed.), The philosophy of sex: Contemporary readings (pp. 158–168). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  43. Guyon, R. (1933). Sex life and sex ethics. London: John Lane the Bodley Head LTD.Google Scholar
  44. Heins, M. (Ed.). (1998). Sex, sin and blasphemy. A guide to America’s censorship wars. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  45. Herdt, G. (Ed.). (1984). Ritualized homosexuality in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. Herdt, G. H. (1987). Guardians of the flutes. Idioms of masculinity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Herdt, G., & McClintock, M. (2000). The magical age of 10. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 587–606. doi: 10.1023/A:1002006521067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Irvine, J. M. (2000). Doing it with words: Discourse and the sex education culture wars. Critical Inquiry, 27, 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Janssen, D. (2013). Is “pedophilia” a paraphrase of the incest taboo? Apropos: Are the corollaries of taboo offered up as reasons for it? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 679–683. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0131-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kershnar, S. (2001). The moral status of harmless adult-child sex. Public Affairs Quarterly, 15(2), 111–132.Google Scholar
  51. Killias, M. (2000). The emergence of a new taboo: The desexualisation of youth in western societies since 1800. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8, 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lancy, D. F. (2008). The anthropology of childhood: Cherubs, chattel, changelings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002). When worlds collide: Social science, politics, and the child sexual abuse meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 57(3), 176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Malón, A. (2011). The “participating victim” in the study of erotic experiences between children and adults: A historical analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 169–188. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9553-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Malón, A. (2012). Pedophilia: A diagnosis in search of a disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1083–1097. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9919-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Malón, A. (2015). Adult-child sex and the limits of liberal sexual morality. Archives of Sexual Behavior,. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0442-8.Google Scholar
  57. Merleau-Ponty, M. (Ed.). (1975). Fenomenología de la percepción [Phenomenology of perception]. Barcelona: Península.Google Scholar
  58. Midgley, M. (1991). Can’t we make moral judgements?. Bristol: The Bristol Press.Google Scholar
  59. Midgley, M. (1994). The ethical primate. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morgan, S. (2003a). Dark desires. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 6, 377–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morgan, S. (2003b). Sex in the head. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Murphy, J. G. (1994). Some ruminations on women, violence and the criminal law. In J. Coleman & A. Buchanan (Eds.), In harm’s way (pp. 207–230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Nagel, T. (1992). Sexual perversion. In T. Nagel (Ed.), Mortal questions (pp. 39–52). Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  64. Nieto, J. A. (2004). Children and adolescents as sexual beings: Cross-cultural perspectives. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13, 461–477. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2004.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Oberman, M. (1996). Statutory rape laws. Does it make sense to enforce them in an increasingly permissive society? Yes: The risk of psychological harm to girls is too great. ABA Journal, 82, 86.Google Scholar
  66. Oberman, M. (2004a). Turning girls into women: Re-evaluating modern statutory rape law. DePaul Journal of Health Care Law, 8(1), 109–178.Google Scholar
  67. Oberman, M. (2004b). Regulating sex with minors: Defining a role for statutory rape. Buffalo Law Review, 48, 703–784.Google Scholar
  68. O’Carroll, T. (1980). Paedophilia: The radical case. London: Peter Owen.Google Scholar
  69. Ofshe, R., & Watters, E. (1996). Making monsters. False memory, psychotherapy and sexual hysteria. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  70. Ondersma, S. J., Chaffin, M., Berliner, L., Cordon, I., Goodman, G. S., & Barnett, D. (2001). Sex with children is abuse: Comment on Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman (1998). Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 707–714. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.127.6.707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Parsons, T. (1954). The incest taboo in relation to social structure and the socialization of the child. British Journal of Sociology, 2, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Percy, W. A. (Ed.). (1996). Pederasty and pedagogy in archaic greece. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  73. Posner, R. (1992). Sex and reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Priest, G. (1997). Sexual perversion. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 75(3), 360–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Primoratz, I. (1999). Ethics and sex. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Primoratz, I. (2001). Sexual morality: Is consent enough? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 4(3), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Renshaw, D. C. (1982). Incest. Understanding and treatment.. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  78. Rind, B. (2013). Critique of Hames and Blanchard (2012), Clancy (2012), and Ryniker (2012) on hebephilia, anthropological data, and maladaptiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 685–691. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0132-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rind, B., Bauserman, R., & Tromovitch, P. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 22–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rind, B., Bauserman, R., & Tromovitch, P. (2000). Condemnation of a scientific article: A chronology and refutation of the attacks and a discussion of threats to the integrity of science. Sexuality & Culture, 4(2), 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ruddick, S. (1975). On sexual morality. In J. Rachels (Ed.), Moral problems: A collection of philosophical essays. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  82. Sandfort, T. (1987). Boys on their contacts with men: A study of sexually expressed friendships. Elmhurst, NY: Global Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  83. Schelsky, H. (1962). Sociología de la sexualidad [Sociology of sexuality]. Buenos Aires: Nueva visión.Google Scholar
  84. Schmidt, G. (2002a). The dilemma of the male pedophile. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31(6), 473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schmidt, G. (2002b). Reply: Is there nothing special about adult-child sex? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31(6), 509–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Scruton, R. (1986). Sexual desire. A moral philosophy of the erotic. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  87. Spiegel, D. (2000). The price of abusing children and numbers. Sexuality and Culture, 4(2), 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thomas, L. (2002). Sexual desire, moral choice, and human ends. Journal of Social Philosophy, 33(2), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thorstad, D. (1991). Man/boy love and the American gay movement. In T. Sandfort, E. Brongersma, & A. van Naerssen (Eds.), Male intergenerational intimacy. Historical, socio-psychological and legal perspectives (pp. 251–274). New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  90. Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire. Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Underwager, R., & Wakefield, H. (1994). Return of the furies. An investigation into recovered memory therapy. Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  92. Wakefield, J. C. (2011). DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: Tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34, 195–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.04.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wertheimer, A. (2003). Consent to sexual relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Human Sciences and EducationUniversity of ZaragozaHuescaSpain

Personalised recommendations