Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 841–861 | Cite as

Changing Discourse, Learning Sex, and Non-coital Heterosexuality

Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

Young people learn what sex is, how to perform it, and what status it has largely through discourse. Sexual discourse has changed since the mid-twentieth century, but coitus still dominates heterosexual sex talk, and both change and continuity are reflected in adolescent sexual attitudes and behavior. Acceptance of non-coital sexuality among LGBTQ people and heterosexuals has increased, but these behaviors often have a different status when performed by members of each of these groups. Non-coital acts may be legitimately sexual when performed by non-heterosexuals, but coitus remains the paradigmatic heterosexual activity even though young heterosexuals often engage in non-coital behaviors. Young heterosexuals often differentiate real coital sex from quasi-sexual non-coital behaviors, and sexuality researchers, clinicians, and educators frequently reinforce this distinction and threaten the sexual status and self-esteem of young heterosexuals who do not like or cannot perform coitus. Many sexuality professionals urge young heterosexuals to recognize non-coital acts as sexual because of their risks of sexually transmitted infections, but sometimes also undermine this message by describing these acts as preliminaries to or substitutes for coitus. These professionals use an objective language of sexuality which presumably should supplant the mistaken usages of young people, but they overlook their own dependence on culturally constructed sexual discourse, and can impose needless problems on young people.

Keywords

Sexual discourse Sexual learning Culture change Non-coital heterosexuality 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

References

  1. Abbott, D. A., & Dalla, R. L. (2008). ’It’s a choice, simple as that’: Youth reasoning for sexual abstinence or activity. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(6), 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alsgaard, H. (2012). Decoupling marriage & procreation: A feminist argument for same sex marriage. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 27, 307–338.Google Scholar
  3. Appiah, K. A. (2000). Stereotypes and the shaping of identity. California Law Review, 88(1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrington, R., Cofranscesco, J., & Wu, A. W. (2004). Questionnaires to measure sexual quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 13, 1643–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayling, K., & Ussher, J. M. (2008). “If sex hurts, am I still a woman?” The subjective experience of vulvodynia in hetero-sexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beasley, C., Brook, H., & Holmes, M. (2012). Heterosexuality in theory and practice. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bermant, G., & Davidson, J. M. (1974). Biological bases of sexual behavior. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Bersamin, M. M., Walker, S., Fisher, D. A., & Grube, J. W. (2006). Correlates of oral sex and vaginal intercourse in early and middle adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blum, L. (2004). Stereotypes and stereotyping: A moral analysis. Philosophical Papers, 33(3), 251–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boddington, P., & Räisänen, U. (2009). Theoretical and practical issues in the definition of health: Insights from aboriginal Australia. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 34, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borten, L. D. (2002). Sex, procreation, and the state interest in marriage. Columbia Law Review, 102, 1089–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brady, S. S., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2007). Adolescents’ reported consequences of having oral sex versus vaginal sex. Pediatrics, 119(2), 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brandom, R. (2010). Conceptual content and discursive practice. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 81, 13–35.Google Scholar
  14. Braun, M., Wassmer, G., Klotz, T., Reinfenrath, B., Mathers, M., & Engelmann, U. (2000). Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: Results of the ‘Cologne Male Survey’. International Journal of Impotence Research, 12, 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brewster, K. L., & Tillman, K. H. (2008). Who’s doing it? Patterns and predictors of youths’ oral sexual experiences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Byers, E. S., Henderson, J., & Hobson, K. M. (2009). University students’ definitions of sexual abstinence and having sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 665–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cameron, D., & Kulick, D. (2003). Language and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carpenter, L. M. (2001). The ambiguity of “having sex”: The subjective experience of virginity loss in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Genital HPV infection—fact sheet. http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/stdfact-hpv.htm. Accessed March 4, 2016.
  20. Chambers, W. C. (2007). Oral sex: Varied behaviors and perceptions in a college population. Journal of Sex Research, 44(1), 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chasin, C. J. De Luzio. (2011). Theoretical issues in the study of asexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 713–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cheng, M. M., & Udry, J. R. (2002). Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davidson, R. J., & Oldersma, J. (2015). Sexuality in movement: Beyond the ‘Sexual Revolution’. Tijdschrift Voor Genderstudies, 18(2), 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diorio, J. A. (2001). Sexuality, difference, and the ethics of sex education. Journal of Social Philosophy, 32, 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dixon-Mueller, R. (2009). Starting young: Sexual initiation and HIV prevention in early adolescence. AIDS Behavior, 13, 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eckert, P. (1994). Entering the heterosexual marketplace: Identities of subordination as a developmental imperative. Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/~eckert/PDF/subordination.pdf
  27. Eig, J. (2014). The birth of the pill: How four pioneers reinvented sex and launched a revolution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Elmerstig, E., Wijma, B., & Berterö, C. (2008). Why do young women continue to have sexual intercourse despite pain? Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Emens, E. F. (2014). Compulsory sexuality. Stanford Law Review, 66, 303–386.Google Scholar
  30. Farvid, P., & Braun, V. (2013). Casual sex as ‘not a natural act’ and other regimes of truth about heterosexuality. Feminism and Psychology, 23, 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Feinberg, J. (2012). Exposing the traditional marriage agenda. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 7(Spring), 301–332.Google Scholar
  32. Forrest, S., Strange, V., Oakley, A., & The RIPPLE Study Team. (2004). What do young people want from sex education? The results of a needs assessment from a peer-led sex education programme. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 6(4), 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frith, H. (2013). Labouring on orgasms: Embodiment, efficiency, entitlement and obligations in heterosex. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 15(4), 494–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gallie, W. B. (1955–1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.Google Scholar
  35. Geras, N. (1995). Solidarity in the conversation of humankind. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Gillon, B. S. (1990). Ambiguity, generality, and indeterminacy: Tests and definitions. Synthese, 85, 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goodenough, U. (2007). The emergence of sex. Zygon, 42, 857–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goodson, P., Suther, S., Pruitt, B. E., & Wilson, K. (2003). Defining abstinence: Views of directors, instructors, and participants in abstinence-only-until-marriage programs in Texas. Journal of School Health, 73(3), 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gute, G., Eshbaugh, E. M., & Wiersma, J. (2008). Sex for you, but not for me: Discontinuity in undergraduate emerging adults’ definitions of “having sex”. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Cornell, J. L., Kropp, R. Y., & Tschann, J. M. (2005). Oral versus vaginal sex among adolescents: Perceptions, attitudes, and behavior. Pediatrics, 115(4), 845–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hans, J. D., Gillen, M., & Akande, K. (2010). Sex redefined: The reclassification of oral-genital contact. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42, 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hans, J. D., & Kimberly, C. (2011). Abstinence, sex, and virginity: Do they mean what we think they mean? American Journal of Sexuality Education, 6, 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hatzimouratids, K., Amar, E., Eardley, I., Giuliano, F., Hatzichristou, D., Montorsi, F., et al. (2010). Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: Erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. European Urology, 57(5), 804–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hellstrom, W. J. G., Gittleman, M., Karlin, G., Segerson, T., Thibonnier, M., Taylor, T., & Paadma-Nathan, H. (2002). Vardenafil for treatment of men with erectile dysfunction: Efficacy and safety in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Andrology, 23(6), 763–771.Google Scholar
  45. Hendricks, J. S., & Howerton, D. M. (2010–2011). Teaching values, teaching stereotypes: sex education and indoctrination in public schools. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 13, 587–641.Google Scholar
  46. Hensel, D. J., Fortenberry, J. D., & Orr, D. P. (2008). Variations in coital and noncoital sexual repertoire among adolescent women. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Herdt, G. (2004). Sexual development, social oppression, and local culture. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 1, 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hill, B. J., Rahman, Q., Bright, D. A., & Sanders, S. A. (2010). The semantics of sexual behavior and their implications for HIV/AIDS research and sexual health: US and UK gay men’s definitions of having “had sex”. AIDS Care, 22, 1245–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hirshfield, S., Chiasson, M. A., Wagmiller, R. L., Reimien, R. H., Humberstone, M., Schienmann, R., & Grov, C. (2010). Sexual dysfunction in an internet sample of U.S. men who have sex with men. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(9), 3104–3145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hockey, J., Meah, A., & Robinson, V. (2007). Mundane heterosexualities. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hofmann, B. (2001). Complexity of the concept of disease as shown through rival theoretical frameworks. Theoretical Medicine, 22, 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Horowitz, A. D., & Spicer, L. (2013). “Having sex” as a graded and hierarchical construct: A comparison of sexual definitions among heterosexual and lesbian emerging adults in the U.K. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jackson, M. (1984). Sex research and the construction of sexuality: A tool of male supremacy? Women’s Studies International Forum, 7(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kaplan, S. A., Gonzalez, R. R., & Te, A. E. (2007). Combination of Alfuzosin and Sidenafil in superior to monotherapy in treating lower urinary symtoms and erectile dysfunction. European Urology, 51, 1717–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralist ignorance and hooking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Leichliter, J. S., Chandra, A., Liddon, N., Fenton, K. A., & Aral, S. O. (2007). Prevalence and correlates of heterosexual anal and oral sex in adolescents and adults in the United States. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 196, 1852–1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Levine, D. N. (1985). The flight from ambiguity. Essays in social and cultural theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lewis, M. (2015). The biology of desire. Melbourne and London: Verso.Google Scholar
  59. LoPiccolo, J. (1983). The prevention of sexual problems in men. In G. W. Albee, S. Gordon, & H. Leitenberg (Eds.), Promoting sexual responsibility and preventing sexual problems (pp. 39–65). Hanover & London: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  60. Manning, J. (2015). Communicating sexual identities: A typology of coming out. Sexuality and Culture, 19, 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Masters, W., & Johnson, V. (1966). Human sexual response. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  62. May, K. L. (2012). Finding Out: An Introduction to LGBT Studies by Deborah T. Meem, Michelle A. Gibson, and Jonathan F. Alexander. Journal of Bisexuality, 12, 543–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McCulloch, A. (2013). Fighting to choose: The abortion rights struggle in New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Menn, M., Goodson, P., Pruitt, B., & Peck-Parrott, K. (2011). Terminology of sexuality expressions that exclude penetration: A literature review. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 6, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Merry, M. S. (2005). Indoctrination, moral instruction, and nonrational beliefs: A place for autonomy? Educational Theory, 55(4), 399–420.Google Scholar
  66. Michaels, S., & Giami, A. (1999). Sexual acts and sexual relationships: Asking about sex in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mohr, J. J. (2002). Heterosexual identity and the heterosexual therapist: An identity perspective on sexual orientation dynamics in psychotherapy. The Counselling Psychologist, 30(3), 532–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Montorsi, F., Briganti, A., Salonia, A., Rigatti, P., Margonato, A., Macchi, A., et al. (2003). Erectile dysfunction prevalence, time of onset and association with risk factors in 300 consecutive patients with acute chest pain and angiographically documented coronary artery disease. European Urology, 44, 360–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mooney-Somers, J., & Ussher, J. M. (2010). Sex as commodity. Single and partnered men’s subjectification as heterosexual men. Men and Masculinities, 12(3), 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Moran, C., & Lee, C. (2014). Women’s constructions of heterosexual non-romantic sex and the implications for sexual health. Psychology & Sexuality, 5, 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nicoletti, A. (2005). The definition of abstinence. Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 18, 57–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nicolson, P., & Burr, J. (2003). What is ‘normal’ about women’s (hetero)sexual desire and orgasm?: A report of an in-depth interview study. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 1735–1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. O’Donohue, W., & Caselles, C. E. (1993). Homophobia: Conceptual, definitional, and value issues. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Assessment, 15(3), 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. O’Gorman, H. J. (1986). The discovery of pluralistic ignorance: An ironic lesson. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 22, 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Opperman, E., Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rogers, C. (2014). ’It feels so good it almost hurts’: Young adults’ experiences of orgasm and sexual pleasure. Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Overall, C. (1990). Heterosexuality and feminist theory. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). What is sex and why does it matter? A motivational approach to exploring individuals’ definitions of sex. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pickering, N., Anderson, L., & Paterson, H. (2015). Teens and young adults should be started on long-acting reversible contraceptives before sexual activity commences. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 122(8), 1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pleasants, N. (2008). Institutional wrongdoing and moral perception. Journal of Social Philosophy, 39(1), 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Potts, A. (2000). Coming, coming, gone: A feminist deconstruction of heterosexual orgasm. Sexualities, 3(1), 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Prause, N., & Graham, C. A. (2007). Asexuality: Classification and characterization. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Przybylo, E. (2011). Crisis and safety: The asexual in sexusociety. Sexualities, 14, 444–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Radner, H. (2008). Compulsory sexuality and the desiring woman. Sexualities, 11(1/2), 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Randall, H. E., & Byers, E. S. (2003). What is sex? Students’ definitions of having sex, sexual partner, and unfaithful sexual behavior. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 12(2), 87–96.Google Scholar
  85. Remez, L. (2000). Oral sex among adolescents: Is it sex or is it abstinence? Family Planning Perspectives, 32(6), 298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5(4), 6310660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Robertson, K. C. (1998). Penetrating sex and marriage: The progressive potential of addressing bisexuality in queer theory. Denver University Law Review, 75, 1375–1408.Google Scholar
  88. Ross, M. W., Daneback, K., & Mänsson, S.-A. (2012). Fluid versus fixed: A new perspective on bisexuality as a fluid orientation beyond gender. Journal of Bisexuality, 12, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ruben, D.-H. (2010). W.B. Gallie and essentially contested concepts. Philosophical Papers, 39(2), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rust, P. (1992). The politics of sexual identity: Sexual attraction and behavior among lesbian and bisexual women. Social Problems, 39, 366–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ryan, A. (2000). Feminism and sexual freedom in an age of AIDS. Sexualities, 4, 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sanders, S. A., Hill, B. J., Yarber, W. L., Graham, C. A., Crosby, R. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2010). Misclassification bias: Diversity in conceptualizations about having ‘had sex’. Sexual Health, 7, 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Scherrer, K. S. (2008). Coming to an asexual identity: Negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities, 11, 621–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Schiappa, E. (2003). Defining reality. Definitions and the politics of meaning. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Segal, L. (1994). Straight sex. Rethinking the politics of pleasure. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  96. Sell, R. L. (1997). Defining and measuring sexual orientation: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(6), 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Shokeid, M. (2002). You don’t eat Indian and Chinese food at the same meal: The bisexual quandary. Anthropological Quarterly, 75, 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Smith, I., Oades, L. G., & McCarthy, G. (2012). Homophpbia to heterosexism: Constructs in need of revisitation. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 8, 34–44.Google Scholar
  99. Song, A. V., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2011). Predictive relationship between adolescent oral and vaginal sex. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 165(3), 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stewart, M. N. (2004–2005). Judicial redefinition of marriage. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 21, 13–132.Google Scholar
  102. Stuckey, B. A. A., Jadzinsky, M. N., Murphy, L. J., Montoris, F., Kadioglu, A., Fraige, F., et al. (2003). Sidenafil citrate for treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 26(2), 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Trotter, E. C., & Alderson, K. G. (2007). University students’ definitions of having sex, sexual partner, and virginity loss: The influence of participant gender, sexual experience, and contextual factors. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 16, 11–29.Google Scholar
  104. Tsang, A. K. T., & Ho, P. S. Y. (2007). Lost in translation: Sex and sexuality in elite discourse and everyday language. Sexualities, 10, 623–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Uecker, J. E., Angotti, N., & Regnerus, M. D. (2008). Going most of the way: ‘Technical virginity’ among American adolescents. Social Science Research, 37, 1200–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Van Anders, S. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1177–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wahlert, L., & Fiester, A. (2012). Questioning scrutiny: Bioethics, sexuality, and gender identity. Bioethical Inquiry, 9, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personaility and Social Psychology, 92, 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Weiss, D., & Bullough, V. L. (2004). Adolescent American sex. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 16(2–3), 43–53.Google Scholar
  110. Wespes, E., Amar, E., Hatzichristou, D., Hatzimouratidis, K., Montorsi, F., Pryor, J., & Vardi, Y. (2006). EAU guidelines on erectile dysfunction: An update. European Urology, 49, 806–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. White, R. (2010). You just believe that because…. Philosophical Perspectives, 24, 574–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wickberg, D. (2000). Homophobia: On the cultural history of an idea. Critical Inquiry, 27, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Williams, T., Connolly, J., & Cribbie, R. (2008). Light and heavy heterosexual activities of young Canadian adolescents: Normative patterns and differential predictors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18(1), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wyatt, T. (2009). Sexual risk taking: For better or worse. American Journal of Health Education, 40(6), 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Zagzebski, L. (2013). Intellectual autonomy. Philosophical Issues, 23, 244–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Te KauwhataNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations