Advertisement

Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 882–899 | Cite as

“Getting It”: Identity and Sexual Communication for Sexual and Gender Minorities with Physical Disabilities

  • Shanna K. Kattari
Original Paper

Abstract

People with disabilities (PWD) make up a significant portion of the population in the US; the 2010 United States Census reported that 21.3 % of the population age 15 and up has a disability. Research and scholarship around sexuality and disability has grown internationally, yet much of the existing research on the sexuality of PWD is focused on sexual self-esteem and social attitudes on sexuality, not how PWD negotiate sex/engage sexually. This study focuses on themes that emerged from interview data in a subsample of a larger study that identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and/or queer, kink/BDSM practicing and/or polyamorous/in open relationships. It examines the themes of kink as a form of communication and boundary setting, as well as identity influences; how the process around coming out regarding sexually marginalized identities, and how these two themes impact coming out and communicating sexual needs regarding disabilities. PWD who are sexual or gender minorities experience unique understandings of communication with sexual partners. The findings suggest that their identities as part of marginalized communities actually serve to support and enhance this communication, leading to more self-reported positive outcomes.

Keywords

Sexuality Disability Qualitative research Kink LGBTQ Polyamorous 

References

  1. Anapol, D. (2010). Polyamory in the 21st century: Love and intimacy with multiple partners. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. APA (American Psychiatric Association). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. http://www.psychiatry.org/dsm5
  3. Baumeister, R. F. (1988). Masochism as escape from self. Journal of Sex Research, 25(1), 28–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernal, A. T., & Coolhart, D. (2005). Learning from sexual minorities: Adolescents and the coming out process. Guidance & Counselling, 20, 128–138.Google Scholar
  5. Bezreh, T., Weinberg, T. S., & Edgar, T. (2012). BDSM Disclosure and stigma management: Identifying opportunities for sex education. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7(1), 37–61. doi: 10.1080/15546128.2012.650984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215–229. doi: 10.1348/014466599162782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Esmail, S., Darry, K., Walter, A., & Knupp, H. (2010). Attitudes and perceptions towards disability and sexuality. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(14), 1148–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faccio, E., Casini, C., & Cipolletta, S. (2014). Forbidden games: the construction of sexuality and sexual pleasure by BDSM ‘players’. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(7), 752–764. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.909531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer, C. T. (2009). Bracketing in qualitative research: Conceptual and practical matters. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4–5), 583–590. doi: 10.1080/10503300902798375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galvin, R. D. (2005). Researching the disabled identity: Contextualising the identity transformations which accompany the onset of impairment. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(3), 393–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00448.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kattari, S. K. (2014). Sexual experiences of adults with physical disabilities: Negotiating with sexual partners. Sexuality and Disability, 32(4), 499–513. doi: 10.1007/s11195-014-9379-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klesse, C. (2006). Polyamory and its ‘others’: Contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 565–583. doi: 10.1177/1363460706069986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klesse, C. (2011). Notions of love in polyamory—Elements in a discourse on multiple loving. Laboratorium, 3(2), 4–25.Google Scholar
  15. McCabe, M. P., Cummins, R. A., & Deeks, A. A. (2000). Sexuality and quality of life among people with physical disability. Sexuality and Disability, 18(2), 115–123. doi: 10.1023/A:1005562813603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCabe, M. P., & Taleporos, G. (2003). Sexual esteem, sexual satisfaction, and sexual behavior among people with physical disability. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32(4), 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morris, J. F. (1997). Lesbian coming out as a multidimensional process. Journal of Homosexuality, 33(2), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moser, C., & Madeson, J. J. (1996). Bound to be free: The SM experience. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Mosher, C. M. (2001). The social implications of sexual identity formation and the coming-out process: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. The Family Journal, 9(2), 164–173. doi: 10.1177/1066480701092011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Padgett, D. K. (2012). Qualitative and mixed methods in public health. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richters, J., De Visser, R. O., Rissel, C. E., Grulich, A. E., & Smith, A. (2008). Demographic and psychosocial features of participants in bondage and discipline, “sadomasochism” or dominance and submission (BDSM): Data from a national survey. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5(7), 1660–1668. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00795.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosario, M., Hunter, J., Maguen, S., Gwadz, M., & Smith, R. (2001). The coming-out process and its adaptational and health-related associations among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: Stipulation and exploration of a model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(1), 133–160. doi: 10.1023/A:1005205630978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  25. Sheff, E. (2005). Polyamorous women, sexual subjectivity and power. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34(3), 251–283. doi: 10.1177/0891241604274263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shuttleworth, R., & Sanders, T. (Eds.). (2010). Sex & disability: politics, identity and access: Introduction. Leeds: Disability Press.Google Scholar
  27. Taleporos, G., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Physical disability and sexual esteem. Sexuality and Disability, 19(2), 131–148. doi: 10.1023/A:1010677823338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tepper, M. S. (2000). Sexuality and disability: The missing discourse of pleasure. Sexuality and Disability, 18(4), 283–290. doi: 10.1023/A:1005698311392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. U. S. Census Bureau. (2012). Americans with disabilities: 2010. Retrieved September 15, 2013, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/p70-131.pdf
  30. Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., & Moser, C. (1983). Social constituents of sadomasochism. Social Problems, 31(4), 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wismeijer, A. A., & Assen, M. A. (2013). Psychological characteristics of BDSM practitioners. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10(8), 1943–1952. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. World Health Organization. (2006). Defining sexual health: report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January 2002, Geneva. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Social WorkUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations