Advertisement

Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 936–958 | Cite as

Heterosexual Allies? Understanding Heterosexuals’ Alliance with the Gay Community

  • Elisabeth O. Burgess
  • Dawn M. Baunach
Original Paper

Abstract

Prevailing wisdom is that increased visibility of gay men and lesbians reduces levels of sexual prejudice, but less is known about who is more likely to ally with the gay community and how interaction with the gay community influences attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Using data from 873 heterosexual college students in the US, we examine how alliance with the gay community, a typology which combines measures of personal contact and community contact, relates to attitudes towards gay men and lesbians. Membership in each alliance category differed by gender, race/ethnicity, size of place, traditional gender role and authoritarian attitudes, religiosity, and political conservatism. Approximately one-third of the sample are allies of the gay community with both personal contact and community contact and lower levels of sexual prejudice. By contrast, another 30 % of the sample has no contact (personal or community) and higher levels of sexual prejudice toward the gay community. We conclude that more complex models of heterosexual contact with gay community are more useful than dichotomous models for understanding differences in attitudes towards gay men and lesbians.

Keywords

Attitudes towards lesbians and gay men Gay community Heterosexual allies Sexual prejudice US college students 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the assistance of Kristin McMillen on earlier version of this manuscript and Griff Tester for his thoughtful feedback throughout the revision process.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D. (1998). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  3. Allison, P. D. (2000). Multiple imputation for missing data: A cautionary tale. Sociological Methods and Research, 28, 301–309. doi: 10.1177/0049124100028003003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  5. Altemeyer, B. (2001). Changes in attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 63–75. doi: 10.1300/J082v42n02_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderssen, N. (2002). Does contact with lesbians and gays lead to friendlier attitudes? A two year longitudinal study. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 124–136. doi: 10.1002/casp.665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett, D. C., & Pollack, L. M. (2005). Whose gay community? Social class, sexual self-expression, and gay community involvement. The Sociological Quarterly, 46, 437–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00021.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barth, J., Overby, L. M., & Huffmon, S. H. (2009). Community context, personal contact, and support for anti-gay rights referendum. Political Research Quarterly, 62, 355–365. doi: 10.1177/1065912908317033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barth, J., & Perry, J. (2009). 2 > 1 + 1? The impact of contact with gay and lesbians couples on attitudes about gays/lesbians and gay-related policies. Politics and Policy, 37(1), 31–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00160.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baunach, D. M. (2011). Decomposing trends in attitudes toward gay marriage, 1988-2006. Social Science Quarterly, 92(2), 346–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00772.x.Google Scholar
  11. Baunach, D. M., Burgess, E. O., & Muse, C. S. (2009). Southern (dis)comfort: Sexual prejudice and contact with gay men and lesbians in the South. Sociological Spectrum, 30(1), 30–64. doi: 10.1080/02732170903340893 Google Scholar
  12. Bell, D., & Binnie, J. (2004). Authenticating queer space: Citizenship, urbanism and governance. Urban Studies, 9, 1807–1820. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000243165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berkowitz, D., Belgrave, L., & Halberstein, R. A. (2007). The interaction of drag queens and gay men in public and private spaces. Journal of Homosexuality, 52(3–4), 11–32. doi: 10.1300/J082v52n03_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brandt, W. R. (2001). Why go to church when you can drink with Mary? Gay male club culture as religion without religion against ethics. Theology and Sexuality, 15, 32–44. doi: 10.1177/135583580100801504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Broido, E. M. (2000). Development of social justice allies during college: A phenomenological investigation. Journal of College Student Development, 41(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  16. Brown-Saracino, J. (2011). From lesbian ghetto to ambient community: The perceived costs and benefits of integration for community. Social Problems, 58(3), 361–388. doi: 10.1525/sp.2011.58.3.361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burn, S. M. (2000). Heterosexuals’ use of “fag” and “queer” to deride one another: A contributor to heterosexism and stigma. Journal of Homosexuality, 40, 1–11. doi: 10.1300/J082v40n02_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Calzo, J. P., & Ward, L. M. (2009). Contributions of parents, peers, and media to attitudes toward homosexuality: Investigating sex and ethnic differences. Journal of Homosexuality, 56, 1101–1116. doi: 10.1080/00918360903279338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Casey, M. (2004). De-dyking queer space(s): Heterosexual female visibility in gay and lesbian spaces. Sexualities, 7(4), 446–461. doi: 10.1177/136346070404706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies, M. (2004). Correlates of negative attitudes toward gay men: Sexism, male role norms, and male sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 259–266. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (2005). General social surveys, 1972–2004 [computer file]. 2nd ICPSR Version. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center [producer], Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut/Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research/Berkeley, CA: Computer-assisted Survey Methods Program (http://sda.berkeley.edu). University of California [distributors].
  22. Doan, P. L. (2007). Queers in the American city: Transgendered perceptions of urban space. Gender, Place and Culture, 14(1), 57–74. doi: 10.1080/09663690601122309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In R. Castronova & D. Nelson (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics (pp. 175–194). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duhigg, J. M., Rostosky, S. S., Gray, B. C., & Wimsatt, M. K. (2010). Development of heterosexuals into sexual minority allies: A qualitative exploration. Sex Research and Social Policy, 7, 2–14. doi: 10.1007/s13178-010-0005-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fetner, T., & Kush, K. (2008). Gay-straight alliances in high schools: Social predictors of early adoption. Youth and Society, 40(1), 114–130. doi: 10.1177/0044118X07308073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fingerhut, A. M. (2011). Straight allies: What predicts heterosexuals’ alliance with the LGBT community? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(9), 2230–2248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frost, D. M., & Meyer, I. H. (2012). Measuring community connectedness among diverse sexual minority populations. Journal of Sex Research, 49(1), 36–49. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.565427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gallup Poll News Service. (2013). Gay and lesbian rights. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1651/gay-lesbian-rights.aspx. Accessed 12 July 2013.
  29. Gamson, J. (1999). Freaks talk back: Tabloid talk shows and sexual nonconformity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Grimshaw, T. (2006). The gay ‘community:’ Stabilising political construct or oppressive regulatory regime? Critical Studies, 28(1), 315–330.Google Scholar
  31. Gudelunas, D. (2012). There’s an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality and Culture, 16, 347–365. doi: 10.1007/s12119-012-9127-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herek, G. M. (1994). Assessing attitudes towards lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Green & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 206–228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Herek, G. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Herek, G. M. (2002). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 40–66. doi: 10.1086/338409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 239–244. doi: 10.1080/00224499309551707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hicks, G. R., & Lee, T. (2006). Public attitudes toward gays and lesbians: Trends and predictors. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 55–77. doi: 10.1300/J082v51n02_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holdt, M., & Griffin, C. (2003). Being gay, being straight and being yourself: Local and global reflections on identity, authenticity and the lesbian and gay scene. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 6, 404–425. doi: 10.1177/13675494030063008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336–353. doi: 10.1177/0146167296224002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. LeBeau, R. T., & Jellison, W. A. (2009). Why get involved? Exploring gay and bisexual men’s experience of the gay community. Journal of Homosexuality, 56, 56–76. doi: 10.1080/00918360802551522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lin, Y., & Israel, T. (2012). Development and validation of a psychological sense of LGBT community scale. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(5), 573–587. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marsiglio, W. (1993). Attitudes toward homosexual activity and gays as friends: A national survey of heterosexual 15- to 19-year-old males. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 12–17. doi: 10.1080/00224499309551673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miceli, M. (2005). Standing out, standing together: The social and political impact of gay-straight alliances. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Murray, S. O. (1996). American gay. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pritchard, A., Morgan, N., & Sedgley, D. (2002). In search of lesbian space? The experience of Manchester’s gay village. Leisure Studies, 21, 105–123. doi: 10.1080/02614360110121551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Proescholdbell, R. J., Roosa, M. W., & Nemeroff, C. J. (2006). Component measures of psychological sense of community among gay men. Journal of Community Psychology, 34(1), 9–24. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosser, B. R. S., West, W., & Weinmeyer, R. (2008). Are gay communities dying or just in transition? Results from an international consultation examining possible structural change in gay communities. AIDS Care, 20(5), 588–595. doi: 10.1080/09540120701867156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rupp, L. J., & Taylor, V. (2003). Drag queens at the 801 Cabaret. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rushbrook, D. (2002). Cities, queer space, and the metropolitan tourist. GLQ: A Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies, 8(1), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seidman, S. (2002). Beyond the closet: The transformation of gay and lesbian life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Skipworth, S. A., Garner, A., & Dettrey, B. J. (2010). Limitations of the contact hypothesis: Heterogeneity in the contact effect on attitudes toward gay rights. Politics and Policy, 38(5), 887–906. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00262.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, S. J., Axelton, A. M., & Saucier, D. A. (2009). The effects of contact on sexual prejudice: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 61, 178–191. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9627-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stotzer, R. L. (2009). Straight allies: Supportive allies toward lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals in a college sample. Sex Roles, 60, 67–80. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9508-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson, E. H, Jr, & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543. doi: 10.1177/000276486029005003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Valentine, G., & Skelton, T. (2003). Finding oneself, losing oneself: The lesbian and gay ‘scene’ as a paradoxical space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 849–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whitley, B. E, Jr, Childs, C. E., & Collins, J. B. (2011). Differences in black and white American college students’ attitudes toward lesbian and gay men. Sex Roles, 64, 299–310. doi: 10.1007/s11199-0109892-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gerontology InstituteGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations