Access and Gatekeeping in Researching Children’s Sexuality: Mess in Ethics and Methods
- 514 Downloads
There is a general idea that research methods help researchers investigate realities “out there”. Recent arguments, however, suggest that research methods are themselves productive, i.e., we can learn about a research topic by investigating aspects and details of the methods used in a research process. The present text investigates methods for gaining access to a research field in a project examining young children’s own (age 9–12 years) notions of sexuality. The article explores how and by whom the issue of children and sexuality is enacted as sensitive when trying to negotiate access to the research field. A whole variety of actors are involved in enacting children’s sexuality: institutions, groups of people, individuals, images, and architectural arrangements. The analysis reveals relationships in which fears, responsibilities, and the cultural attribution of vulnerability (sensitivity) are negotiated by adults, children, and the researcher.
KeywordsChild studies Child sexuality Children’s sexuality Sensitivity Qualitative methodology Access negotiations Mess in ethics
I am beholden to Pål Aarsand and Steve Woolgar for their careful reading and helpful comments on earlier versions of the text. I also want to thank the reviewers for insightful comments and the Swedish Research Council for funding Dnr 2004-2242.
- Bergenheim, Å. (1994). Barnet, libido och samhället: Om den svenska diskursen kring barns sexualitet 1930–1960 [The child, the libido, and society: Swedish discourse on childhood sexuality, 1930–1960]. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of History of Science and Ideas, Umeå University. Grängesberg: Höglunds förlag.Google Scholar
- Buckingham, D., & Bragg, S. (2004). Young people, sex and the media: The facts of life?. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Evans, D. T. (1993). Sexual citizenship: The material construction of sexualities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Farquhar, C., & Das, R. (1999/2001). Are focus groups suitable for ‘sensitive’ topics? In R. S. Barbour, & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 47–63). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2007). The politics of teen women’s sexuality: Public policy and the adolescent female body. Emory Law Journal, 56(4), 993–1038.Google Scholar
- Forskningsetiska principer (2013). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet. Retrived 24 June 2013 from http://www.codex.vr.se/texts/HSFR.pdf.
- Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Franke, S., & Sjöstrand, C. (2005). Barndomsprojektet vid Dramatiska institutet. Stockholm: Högskoleverket.Google Scholar
- Haudrup Christensen, P. (1999). Childhood and the cultural constitution of vulnerable bodies. In A. Prout (Ed.), Body, childhood and society (pp. 38–58). New York: Palgrave Publishers.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A. R. (1998). The sociology of emotion as a way of seeing. In G. Bendelow & S. J. Williams (Eds.), Emotions in social life (pp. 3–15). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- James, A., & James, A. L. (2004). Constructing children, childhood and the child. In A. James & A. L. James (Eds.), Constructing childhood: Theory, policy and social practice (pp. 10–28). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Kammarens protokoll 2004/05:103. (2005). Retrieved April 12, 2005 from http://www.riksdagen.se/webbnav/index.aspx?nid=101&bet=2004/05:103.
- Larsson, I. (2001). Children and sexuality: “Normal” sexual behavior and experiences in childhood (Linköping University Medical Dissertations no. 689). Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University.Google Scholar
- Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Law, J., & Urry, J. (2003). Enacting the social. Published by the Department of Sociology and the Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YN, UK. Retrieved November 1, 2010 from http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law-Urry-encating-the-Social.pdf.
- Lee, M. R. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Plummer, K. (2003). Intimate citizenship and the culture of sexual story telling. In J. Weeks, J. Holland, & M. Waites (Eds.), Sexualities and society: A reader (pp. 33–42). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Sparrman, A. (2002). Visuell kultur i barns vardagsliv—Bilder, medier och praktiker (Diss.). [Visual culture in the everyday life of children—Pictures, media and practices] (Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, 250). Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
- Sparrman, A., & Sandin, B. (2012). Situated child consumption: An introduction. In A. Sparrman, B. Sandin, & J. Sjöberg (Eds.), Situating child consumption: Rethinking values and notions of children, childhood and consumption (pp. 9–31). Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar
- SVT/TT (2005, November 30). RFSU: Orimliga proportioner. Retrieved 11 April 2009 from http://mobil.svt.se/.58360/1.496414/utskriftsvanligt_format?printerfriendly=true.
- Weeks, J. (2003). Sexuality (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Weeks, J., Holland, J., & Waites, M. (2003). Introduction. In J. Weeks, J. Holland, & M. Waites (Eds.), Sexualities and society: A reader (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Westerberg, B. (2005). Dramatiska institutet—En skola i kris? Report. Stockholm: Dramatiska institutets styrelse.Google Scholar