Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 486–502 | Cite as

“Coming Clean” on Duty of Care: Australian Print Media’s Representation of Male Versus Female Sex Offenders in Institutional Contexts

Original Paper

Abstract

Public opinion about sexual abuse of minors is greatly shaped by mass media and the way individual cases are reported. This paper examines Australian print media’s representation of sex offenders, focussing particularly on the sex of the offenders and aiming to shed light on some of the misconceptions and deep-rooted prejudices within the population at large. Given the multi-faceted nature of sexual offences, this paper focuses on sexual offences committed by both males and females against minors in the context of a companion breach of duty of care. In order to explore the effect that linguistic tools can have in the Australian print media’s way of reporting sexual abuse cases, twenty-nine newspaper articles published in Australian dailies were selected for analysis. The analysis of these articles reveals a marked bias in the manner in which sexual offences perpetrated by males, as opposed to females, are reported, suggesting a male monopoly on sexual abuse. We argue that this biased representation, which hinders adequate profiling of sexual offences against minors, may stem from an androcentric view of sexuality and from the systematic denial of female agency when it comes to sex.

Keywords

Media representation Child sexual abuse Duty of care Female sex offenders 

References

  1. Allen, C. M. (1990). Women as perpetrators of child sexual abuse: Recognition barriers. In A. L. Horton, B. L. Johnson, L. M. Roundy, & D. Williams (Eds.), The incest perpetrator: A family member no one wants to treat (pp. 108–125). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, I., & Swainson, V. (2001). Perceived motivation for rape: Gender differences in beliefs about female and male rape. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6(8), 107–122.Google Scholar
  3. Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender stereotypes and roles. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16, 645–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Busby, D. M., & Compton, S. V. (1997). Patterns of sexual coercion in adult heterosexual relationships: An exploration of male victimization. Family Process, 36(1), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calderwood, D. (1987). The male rape victim. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, 21(5), 53–55.Google Scholar
  7. Canter, D., & Heritage, R. (1990). A multivariate model of sexual offence behaviour: Developments in ‘offender profiling’. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 1(2), 185–212.Google Scholar
  8. Cavanagh, S. L. (2004). Upsetting desires in the classroom: School sex scandals and the pedagogy of the femme fatale. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 9, 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, K. (1989). The linguistics of blame: Representation of women in the Sun’s reporting of crimes of sexual violence. In D. Cameron (Ed.), The feminist critique of language: A reader (pp. 183–197). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Coxell, A. W., & King, M. B. (2002). Gender, sexual orientation and sexual assault. In J. Petrak (Ed.), The trauma of sexual assault: Treatment, prevention, and practice (pp. 45–68). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. DeCorse, C. J. B., & Vogtle, S. P. (1997). In a complex voice: The contradictions of male elementary teachers’ career choice and professional identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Denov, M. S. (2001). A culture of denial: Exploring professional perspectives on female sex offending. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 303.Google Scholar
  13. Denov, M. S. (2003a). The myth of innocence: Sexual scripts and the recognition of child sexual abuse by female perpetrators. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denov, M. S. (2003b). To a safer place? Victims of sexual abuse by females and their disclosures to professionals. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denov, M. S. (2004). Perspectives on female sex offending: A culture of denial. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Fedoroff, J. P., & Moran, B. (1997). Myths and misconceptions about sex offenders. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6(4), 263.Google Scholar
  17. Finkelhor, D., & Russell, D. (1984). Women as perpetrators. In D. Finkelhor (Ed.), Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 578–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (Eds.). (1979). Language and control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Giroux, H. (1991). Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics: Rethinking educational boundaries. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  22. Goddard, C. (1999). Read all about it: The news about child abuse. Child Abuse Review, 5(5), 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goddard, C., & Saunders, B. (2000). The gender neglect and textual abuse of children in the print media. Child Abuse Review, 9, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graddol, D., & Swann, J. (1989). Gender voices. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Greer, C. (2003). Sex crime and the media: Sex offending and the press in a divided society. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Groth, N., & Burgess, A. W. (1980). Male rape: Offenders and victims. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 806–810.Google Scholar
  27. Haste, H. (1994). The sexual metaphor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Herman, J. (1981). Father-daughter incest. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Howard, J. A. (1984). The “normal” victim: The effects of gender stereotypes on reactions to victims. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47(3), 270–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunt, L. M. (2006). Females who sexually abuse in organisations working with children. Characteristics, International and Australian prevelance rates: Implications for child protection. Melbourne: Child Wise.Google Scholar
  31. Itzin, C. (Ed.). (2000). Home truths about child sexual abuse: A reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. King, J. R. (2009). What can he want?: Male teachers, young children, and teaching desire. In W. Martino, M. Kehler, & M. Weaver-Hightower (Eds.), The problem with boys’ education: Beyond the backlash (pp. 242–261). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Kitzinger, J. (2002). The ultimate neighbour from hell? Stranger danger and the media framing of paedophiles. In Y. Jewkes & G. Letherby (Eds.), Criminology: A reader. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Landor, R. V. (2009). Double standards? Representation of male versus female sex offenders in the Australian media. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 2(2), 84–93.Google Scholar
  35. Lenhart, S. A. (2004). Clinical aspects of sexual harassment and gender discrimination: Psychological consequences and treatment interventions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Mathis, J. L. (1972). Clear thinking about sexual deviation. Chicago: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar
  37. McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  38. McDevitt, S. (1996). The impact of news media on child abuse reporting. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20(4), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitchell, D., Hirschman, R., & Nagayama-Hall, G. C. (1999). Attributions of victim responsibility, pleasure and trauma in male rape. The Journal of Sex Research, 36(4), 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1998). Men’s self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Myers, M. F. (1989). Men sexually assaulted as adults and sexually abused as boys. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 18(3), 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nelson, E. D. (1994). Females who sexually abuse children: A discussion of gender stereotypes and symbolic assailants. Qualitative Sociology, 17(1), 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Plante, T. G. (Ed.). (1999). Bless me father for i have sinned: Perspectives on sexual abuse committed by Roman catholic priests. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  44. Plummer, K. (1981). Paedophilia: Constructing a sociological baseline. In M. Cook & K. Howells (Eds.), Adult sexual interest in children (pp. 221–250). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. Schneider, L. J., Soh-Chiew Ee, J., & Aronson, H. (1994). Effects of victim gender and physical versus psychological trauma/injury on observers’ perceptions of sexual assault and its aftereffects. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 30(11/12), 793–808.Google Scholar
  46. Sgroi, S. M., & Sargent, M. (1993). Impact and treatment issues for victims of childhood sexual abuse by female perpetrators. In M. Elliott (Ed.), Female sexual abuse of children: The ultimate taboo. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  47. Smallbone, S. W., & Wortley, R. K. (2001). Child sexual abuse: Offender characteristics and modus operandi. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra (Document # 193).Google Scholar
  48. Smith, R., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Snyder, H., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, D.C.: report commissioned by U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  50. Stanley, J. P., & Robbins, S. W. (1978). Sex-marked predicates in English. Papers in Linguistics, 11, 487–516.Google Scholar
  51. Struckman-Johnston, C. (1998). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Struckman-Johnston, C., & Struckman-Johnston, D. (1994). Men’s reactions to hypothetical female sexual advances: A beauty bias in response to sexual coercion. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 31(7/8), 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2001). Lifestyle factors associated with the sexual assault of men: A routine activity theory analysis. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 9(2), 153–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11, 7–49.Google Scholar
  55. Vaux, A. (1993). Paradigmatic assumptions in sexual harassment research: Being guided without being misled. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 42(1), 116–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vizard, E., Monck, E., & Misch, P. (1995). Child and adolescent sex abuse perpetrators: A review of the research literature. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36(5), 731–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watkins, B., & Bentovim, A. (1992). The sexual abuse of male children and adolescents: A review of current research. Journal of Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry, 33(10), 197–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weaver-Hightower, M. (2011). Male preservice teachers and discouragement from teaching. Journal of Men’s Studies, 19(2), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Welsh, S. (1999). Gender and sexual harassment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams, C. L. (1997). Sexual harassment in organizations: A critique of current research and policy. Sexuality and Culture, 1, 19–44.Google Scholar
  62. Wolfe, D. A., Jaffe, P. G., Jetté, J. L., & Poisson, S. E. (2003). The impact of child abuse in community institutions and organizations: Advancing professional and scientific understanding. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Languages and LinguisticsGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations