Advertisement

Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 240–255 | Cite as

‘Whatever the Approach, Tab B Still Fits into Slot A’: Twenty Years of Sex Scripts in Romance Novels

  • A. Dana Ménard
  • Christine Cabrera
Original Paper

Abstract

In 2009, romance novels accounted for $1.36 billion worth of book sales, giving this genre the largest market share by a wide margin. However, despite their popularity, very little research has been done on the sexual behaviours depicted in these books or on the context in which these behaviours occur. The goals of this study were to gain an understanding of how sex and sexuality are portrayed in contemporary romance novels and to determine whether these portrayals have changed over the last 20 years. It was hypothesized that most depictions of sexuality in romance novels would adhere to Western sexual scripts (Gagnon 1977; Gagnon and Simon 1973; Simon and Gagnon 1986, 1987) and that this would not change over time. The sample consisted of books that had won the Romance Writers of America award for best contemporary single-title romance from 1989 to 2009. A quantitative content analysis revealed that hypotheses were supported with respect to characterization of the male and female protagonists, characterization and context of the romantic relationships, and order and nature of sexual behaviours. The implications of these results for further research on depictions of sex and sexuality in the media are considered.

Keywords

Romance novels Sex scripts Representations of sex and sexuality in fiction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Peggy Kleinplatz, Ph.D., Rebecca Plante, Ph.D., John Hunsley, Ph.D., and Mylène Laforest, B.A. for their assistance in strengthening this paper. We would also like to thank the Romance Writers of America for their kind assistance.

References

  1. Abramson, P. R., & Mechanic, M. B. (1983). Sex and the media: Three decades of best-selling books and major motion pictures. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12, 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assiter, A. (1988). Romance fiction. Porn for women? In G. Day & C. Bloom (Eds.), Perspectives on pornography: Sexuality in film and literature (pp. 101–109). London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  3. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2001). SexEd.com: Values and norms in web-based sexuality education. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bielay, G., & Herold, E. S. (1995). Popular magazines as a source of sexual information for university women. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 4(4), 247–262.Google Scholar
  5. Brockmann, S. (2000). Bodyguard. New York: Random House, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter, L. M. (1998). From girls into women: Scripts for sexuality and romance in Seventeen magazine, 1974–1994. The Journal of Sex Research, 35, 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castleman, M. (2004). Great sex. New York: Rodale Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Clawson, L. (2005). Cowboys and schoolteachers: Gender in romance novels, secular and Christian. Sociological perspectives, 48, 461–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crusie, J. (2005). Bet me. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dempsey, J. M., & Reichert, T. (2000). Portrayal of married sex in the movies. Sexuality and Culture, 4(3), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diekman, A. B., McDonald, M., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). Love means never having to be careful: The relationship between reading romance novels and safer sex behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duran, R. L., & Prusank, D. T. (1997). Relational themes in men’s and women’s popular nonfiction magazine articles. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frith, H., & Kitzinger, C. (2001). Reformulating sexual script theory: Developing a discursive psychology of sexual negotiation. Theory and Psychology, 11, 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gagnon, J. H. (1977). Human sexualities. Glenview, Il: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
  15. Gagnon, J., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago, Il: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Hetsroni, A. (2007). Three decades of sexual content on prime-time network programming: A longitudinal meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 57, 318–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hynie, M., Lydon, J. E., Cote, S., & Wiener, S. (1998). Relational sexual scripts and women’s condom use: The importance of internalized norms. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 370–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim, J. L., & Ward, L. M. (2004). Pleasure reading: Associations between young women’s sexual attitudes and their reading of contemporary women’s magazines. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krassas, N. R., Blauwkamp, J. M., & Wesselink, P. (2001). Boxing Helena and corseting Eunice: Sexual rhetoric in Cosmopolitan and Playboy magazines. Sex Roles, 44, 751–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krassas, N. R., Blauwkamp, J. M., & Wesselink, P. (2003). “Master your Johnson”: Sexual rhetoric in Maxim and Stuff magazines. Sexuality and Culture, 7, 98–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ménard, A. D., & Kleinplatz, P. K. (2008). Twenty-one moves guaranteed to make his thighs go up in flames: Depictions of ‘great sex’ in popular magazines. Sexuality and Culture, 12, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Milhausen, R., & Herold, E. S. (1999). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. The Journal of Sex Research, 36, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Ortiz-Torres, B., Williams, S. P., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Urban women’s gender scripts: Implications for HIV prevention. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips, D. (2006). Women’s fiction 1945–2005: Writing romance. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  27. Phillips, S. E. (2001). First lady. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  28. Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Roberts, N. (2004). Birthright. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  30. Romance Writers of America (RWA). (2011a). About the romance genre. Retrieved January 7, 2011 from http://www.rwanational.org/cs/the_romance_genre.
  31. Romance Writers of America (RWA). (2011b). National contests and awards. Retrieved January 7, 2011 from http://www.rwanational.org/cs/the_romance_genre.
  32. Rosen, R. C., & Leiblum, S. R. (1988). A sexual scripting approach to problems of desire. In S. R. Leiblum & R. C. Rosen (Eds.), Sexual desire disorders (pp. 168–191). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  33. Ruggiero, J. A., & Weston, L. C. (1983). Conflicting images of women in romance novels. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 6, 18–25.Google Scholar
  34. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. (1987). The sexual scripting of oral genital contacts. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thurston, C. (1987). The romance revolution: Erotic novels for women and the quest for a new sexual identity. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ward, L. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ward, L. M. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23, 347–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 13, 496–502.Google Scholar
  40. Wiggs, S. (2006). Lakeside cottage. Don Mills, ON: Mira Books.Google Scholar
  41. Zilbergeld, B. (1999). The new male sexuality (Rev. ed.). New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.OttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations