Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 19–40 | Cite as

Cross-National Identity Transformation: Becoming a Gay ‘Asian-American’ Man

  • Shinsuke EguchiEmail author
Original Paper


Prior to moving to the U.S., the author, a gay Japanese man, was secure in his multiple identities. After the cross-national transition to the U.S., however, he confronted unique and particular challenges in negotiating his multiple identities. As a foreigner, adopting the cultural discourse of the gay Asian-American identity as a way of life shocked and surprised him—especially because of the ways in which others communicated with him. In particular, others generally viewed his identity expression as reinforcing the stereotypical image of gay men and failing to conform with the social perception of Asian-Americans. Also, the racialized and gendered image of gay Asian-American men became a conflict in his interactions with gay and bisexual men because its image did not fully represent who he is. Being trapped by his dual-identity conflict, he faced difficulty in negotiating performative aspects of gay Asian-American male identity construction. At the same time, this contradiction became an opportunity for him to (de)construct his dual identity conflict and to finally name himself with such labeling. This analysis employs autoethnography to explore the author’s cross-national transformation process of becoming a gay Asian-American man. Finally, this analysis intends to link his personal experience and the cultural and social experiences of gay Asian-American male identity.


Autoethnography Cross-national transition Identity negotiation Dual-identity conflict Gay Asian-American man 



The author wishes to thank his NCA DHS 2009 team faculty members, Drs. Ron Arnett (Duquesne University), Leda Cooks (University of Massachusetts, Amherst), and Randy Dillon (Missouri State University) and his blind reviewers for their critiques and evaluations of this study. Also, the author would like to specially thank Drs. Deborah Borisoff (New York University), Victoria Chen (San Francisco State University), James Chesebro (Ball State University), Melbourne Cummings (Howard University), Karen Lovaas (San Francisco State University), William Starosta (Howard University), and Carolyn Stroman (Howard University) for their support and encouragement on obtaining in his scholarship.


  1. Adams, C. L., & Kimmel, D. C. (1997). Exploring the lives of older African American gay men. In B. Greene (Ed.), Ethnic and cultural diversity among lesbian and gay men (pp. 132–151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, P. (1997). Narrative turn or blind alley? Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayres, T. (1999). China doll -the experience of being a gay Chinese Australian. In P. A. Jackson & G. Sullivan (Eds.), Multicultural queer: Australian narratives (pp. 87–97). New York, NY: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1997). Rethinking communication in personal relationships from a dialectical perspective. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 325–349). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1998). Dialectic approaches to studying personal relationships. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Blumenfeld, W., & Raymond, D. (1988). Looking at gay and lesbian life. New York, NY: Philosophical library.Google Scholar
  8. Brewer, M., & Miller, N. (1996). Intergroup relations. Pacific grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  9. Burnard, P. (2007). Seeing the psychiatrist: An autoethnographic account. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 14(8), 808–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, J. (1993a). Bodies that matter. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Butler, J. (1993b). Limitation and gender insubordination. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 307–320). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politic of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Cass, V. C. (1979). Homosexual identity formation: A theoretical model. Journal of Homosexuality, 9(2/3), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cass, V. C. (1984). Homosexual identity formation: Testing a theoretical mode. Journal of Sex Research, 20(2), 143–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chase, S. E. (2008). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed., pp. 57–94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Chen, V. (2004). (De)hyphenated identity: The double voice in The Woman Warrior. In A. Gonzalez, M. Houston, & V. Chen (Eds.), Our voices: Essays in culture, ethnicity, and communication (pp. 16–25). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  18. Chen, G., & Starosta, W. (2005). Foundations of intercultural communication. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  19. Chesebro, J. W. (2001). Gender, masculinities, identities, and interpersonal relationship systems: Men in general and gay men in particular. In L. P. Arliss & D. J. Borisoff (Eds.), Women and men communicating: Challenges and changes (pp. 33–64). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  20. Chng, C. L., Wong, F. Y., Park, R. J., Edberg, M. C., & Lai, D. S. (2003). A model for understanding sexual health among Asian American/Pacific Islander men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States. AIDS Education and Prevention, 15(Supplement A), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cho, S. (1998). Rice: Explorations into gay Asian culture and politics. Toronto, Canada: Queer Press.Google Scholar
  22. Chou, C.-C. (2008). Critique on the notion of model minority: An alternative racism to Asian American? Asian Ethnicity, 9(3), 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Coffey, P. (1999). The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Cornyetz, N. (1994). Fetished Blackness: Hip hop and racial desire in contemporary Japan. Social Text, 41, 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dank, B. M. (1971). Coming out in the gay world. Psychiatry, 34, 60–77.Google Scholar
  26. Darling-Wolf, F. (2000). Texts in context: Intertextuality, hybridity, and the negotiation of cultural identity in Japan. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 24(2), 134–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Dube, E. M., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (1999). Sexual identity development among ethnic sexual-minority male youths. Developmental Psychology, 35(6), 1389–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflectivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  32. Fung, R. (1998). Looking for my penis: The eroticized Asian in gay video porn. In D. L. Eng & A. Y. Hom (Eds.), Q & A Queer in Asian American (pp. 115–134). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, J. K. (2001). Ethnographic presentation as relationship. In A. P. Bochner & C. Ellis (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature and aesthetics (pp. 11–33). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  35. Haldeman, D. C. (2007). The village people: Identity and development in the gay male community. In K. J. Bieschke, R. M. Perez, & K. A. Debord (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender clients (pp. 71–89). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Han, C.-S. (2006). Geisha of a different kind: Gay Asian men and the gendering of sexual identity. Sexuality and Culture, 10(3), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Han, C.-S. (2008). No fats, femmes, or Asians: The utility of critical race theory in examining the role of gay stock stories in the marginalization of gay Asian men. Contemporary Justice Review, 11(1), 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Han, C.-S. (2010). One gay Asian body: A personal narrative for examining human behavior in the social environment. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20(1), 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harada, M. (2001). Japanese male gay and bisexual identity. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(2), 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hegde, R. S. (2002). Translated enactments: The relational configurations of the Asian Indian immigrant experience. In J. N. Martin, T. K. Nakayama, & L. A. Flores (Eds.), Readings in intercultural communication: Experiences and contexts (pp. 259–266). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Holman-Jones, S. (2008). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting interpretive qualitative materials (3rd ed., pp. 205–246). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Jackson, R. L. (2002). Cultural contracts theory: Toward an understanding of identity negotiation. Communication Quarterly, 50(3), 359–367.Google Scholar
  43. Jackson, R. L. (2006). Scripting the Black masculine body: Identity, discourse, and racial politics in popular media. Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  44. Jackson, R. L. (2009). Mapping cultural communication research: 1960s to the present. In J. W. Chesebro (Ed.), A century of transformation: Studies in honor of the 100th anniversary of the eastern communication association (pp. 272–292). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Johnson, A. G. (2001). Privilege, power, and difference. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  46. Kawai, Y. (2005). Stereotyping Asian America: The dialectic of the model minority and the yellow peril. Howard Journal of Communications, 16(2), 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrated theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Madon, S. (1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles, 37(9/10), 663–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McCall, G., & Simmons, J. (1978). Identities and interaction. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society; from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Nakayama, T. K. (2002). Framing Asian Americans. In C. R. Mann & M. S. Zatz (Eds.), Images of color: Images of crime (pp. 92–99). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  52. Nakayama, T. K. (2004). Disorienting identities: Asian Americans, history, and intercultural communication. In A. Gonzalez, M. Houston, & V. Chen (Eds.), Our voices: Essays in culture, ethnicity, and communication (pp. 26–31). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  53. Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Operario, D., Han, C.-S., & Choi, K.-H. (2008). Dual identity among gay Asian Pacific Islander men. Culture, Health, & Sexuality, 10(5), 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Phua, V. C. (2007). Contesting and maintaining hegemonic masculinities: Gay Asian American men in mate selection. Sex Roles, 57, 909–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Plummer, K. (1975). Sexual stigma: An interactionst account. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Plummer, K. (1981). Homosexual categories: Some research problems in the labeling perspective of homosexuality. In K. Plummer (Ed.), The making of the modern homosexual (pp. 53–75). London, England: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  58. Poon, M. K.-L. (2000). Inter-racial same-sex abuse: The vulnerability of gay men of Asian descent in relationships with Caucasian men. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 11(4), 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Poon, M. K.-L. (2006). The discourse if oppression in contemporary gay Asian diasporal literature: liberation or limitation? Sexuality and Culture, 10(3), 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pyke, K., & Dang, D. (2003). “FOB” and “whitewashed”: Identity and internalized racism among second generation Asian Americans. Qualitative Sociology, 26(2), 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1967). Homosexuality: The formation of a sociological perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 8, 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, J. P., & Edmonston, B. (1997). The new Americas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  63. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Ting-Toomey, S. (1986). Interpersonal ties in intergroup communication. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Intergroup communication (pp. 114–126). Baltimore, MD: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  65. Ting-Toomey, S. (1989). Identity and interpersonal bounding. In M. K. Asante & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (pp. 351–373). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Ting-Toomey, S. (1999). Communicating across cultures. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  67. Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 211–233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Troiden, R. (1998). A model of homosexual identity formation. In P. M. Nardi & B. E. Schneider (Eds.), Social perspective in lesbian and gay studies: A reader (pp. 261–278). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  70. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York, NY: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  71. Wall, S. (2006). An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 146–160.Google Scholar
  72. Yep, G. A., Lovaas, K. E., & Ho, P. C. (2001). Communication in “Asian American” families with queer members: A relational dialectics perspective. In M. Bernstein & R. Reimann (Eds.), Queer families, queer politics: Challenging culture and the state (pp. 152–172). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Zhang, Q. (2010). Asian Americans beyond the model minority stereotype: The nerdy and the left out. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 3(1), 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication and CultureHoward UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations