Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 193–203 | Cite as

Landscapes of Erotophobia: The Sexual(ized) Child in the Postmodern Anglophone West

  • Gail Hawkes
  • R. Danielle Egan
Original Paper


The issue of ‘child sexualization’ is widely addressed in the mass media of the Anglophone West. It is a topic on which many voices, both lay and professional, pronounce upon with conviction. Almost universally the judgment is that this is a damaging and unwanted consequence of the ‘modern world’ that cannot be avoided, so that protection of ‘the child’ is the only recourse. This introduction argues that this hegemonic discourse entails unchallenged and naturalized assumptions. We identify three: the normative distinction between ‘proper’ and improper sexualization––where the former involves the staged transmission of approved knowledge from adult to child; while the latter is the consequence of a ‘free market’ in exploitative imagery and inappropriate expectations of the unprotected child in the adult world. Second, the sexually agentic child is not only missing but logically excluded. Paradoxically the very capacity essential for growing to full citizenship is denied the citizens of the future. Finally, that though ‘the child’ is deemed at risk, it is girls who are the naturalized victims within traditionally gendered framings. We develop these themes in relation to the work of the other contributors, whose work strengthens and deepens the necessary critical challenge.


Erotophobia Sexualization Childhood Agency Gender 


  1. American Psychological Association Task Force. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the sexualization of girls. American Psychological Association. Retrieved 25 April 2008.
  2. Coninck-Smith, N. de. (2009). ‘Children’s talk and parental fear’. Cases of sexual misconduct in Danish state schools 1900–1970. Special Issue on the History of Sexuality of Childhood and Youth, 22(2), Spring/Summer (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  3. Cross, G. (2004). The cute and the cool: Wondrous innocence and modern American children’s culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Durham, M. G. (2008). The lolita effect: The media sexualization of girls and what we can do about it. Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press. Google Scholar
  5. Egan, R. D., & Hawkes, G. (2007). Producing the prurient through the pedagogy of purity: Childhood sexuality and the social purity movement. Journal of Historical Sociology, 20(4), 443–461.Google Scholar
  6. Egan, R. D., & Hawkes, G. (2008). Girls, sexuality and the strange carnalities of advertisements: Deconstructing the discourse of corporate paedophilia. Australian Feminist Studies, 23(57), 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Epstein, D., & Johnson, R. (1998). Schooling sexualities. Buckinghamshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, D. T. (1993). Sexual citizenship: The material construction of sexualities. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1980). History of sexuality Vol. 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  10. Giddens, A. (1984). Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Hawkes, G. (2004). Sex and pleasure in western culture. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Hawkes, G., & Egan, R. D. (2009a). Developing the sexual child. Special Issue on the History of Sexuality of Childhood and Youth, 22(2), Spring/Summer (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  13. Hawkes, G., & Egan, R. D. (2009b). Complexities and continuities: Discourse of childhood sexuality 1830–1940. In I. Crozier (Ed.), Sexuality in the age of Empire 1820–1920 (Vol. 5 of The cultural history of sexuality series). Oxford: Berg (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  14. Irvine, J. (2002). Talk about sex: The battle over sex education in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kincaid, J. (1998). Erotic innocence: The culture of child molesting. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  16. King, N. (1995). Speaking our truth: Voices of courage and healing for male survivors of childhood sexual abuse. New York: Harper-Perennial.Google Scholar
  17. Leahy, T. (1992). Positively experienced man/boy sex: The discourse of seduction and the social construction of masculinity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 28(1), 71–88.Google Scholar
  18. Lees, S. (1986). Losing out: Sexuality and adolescent girls. London: Hutchinson Educational.Google Scholar
  19. Lees, S. (1993). Sugar and spice: Sexuality and adolescent girls. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Levine, J. (2002). Harmful to minors: The perils of protecting children from sex. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  21. McRobbie, A. (1991). Feminism and youth culture. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mrazek, D. (1991). Response to the Bauserman Critique. In T. Sandfort, E. Brongersma, & A. van Naerssen (Eds.), Male intergenerational intimacy: Historical, socio-psychological, and legal perspectives (pp. 317–318). New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  23. Oppliger, P. (2008). Girls gone skank: The sexualization of girls in american culture. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland and Company Press.Google Scholar
  24. Postman, N. (1994). The disappearance of childhood. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  25. Romesberg, D. (2009). The tightrope of normalcy: Homosexuality, developmental citizenship, and American adolescence, 1890–1940 historical sociology. Special Issue on the History of Sexuality of Childhood and Youth, 22(2), Spring/Summer (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  26. Rush, E., & La Nauze, A. (2006). Corporate paedophilia: Sexualisation of children in Australia. Australian institute working paper #90. Deakin, ACT: Australian institute. Available from: Accessed 10 April 2008.
  27. Sandfort, T. (1982). The sexual aspects of paedophile relations. Amsterdam: Pan/SpartacSc.Google Scholar
  28. Schneider, J. (2009). Queer wordplay: Language and laughter in the “Boys of Boise” morals panic historical sociology. Special Issue on the History of Sexuality of Childhood and Youth, 22(2), Spring/Summer (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  29. Thomson, R., & Scott, S. (1991). Learning about sex: Young women and the social construction of sexual identity (2nd ed., 1993). London: Tufnell Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tolman, D. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Waites, M. (2005). The age of consent: young people, sexuality and citizenship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Yuill, R. (2004). Male age-discrepant intergenerational sexualities and relationships. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Behavioral, Cognitive and Social ScienceUniversity of New England Armidale Australia
  2. 2.Gender and Sexuality Studies ProgramSt. Lawrence UniversityCantonUSA

Personalised recommendations