Advertisement

Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 45–57 | Cite as

“Can Women Have Sex Like a Man?”: Sexual Scripts in Sex and the City

  • Gail MarkleEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The television series Sex and the City became an instant international hit from its 1998 debut on HBO throughout its final episode in 2004 and still remains popular through syndication and DVD sales and rentals. The series garnered widespread attention due to its explicit depiction and candid discussion of female sexuality. Sex and the City challenges commonly held cultural beliefs about what constitutes appropriate sexual desires and behaviors for women. According to sexual script theory, sexuality is not innate, but is learned through cultural messages. I performed a content analysis on the sexual scripts embedded in the series to determine if the sexual encounters of the characters were more likely to be relational or recreational. I also compared the characters’ sexual behavior to that of respondents of an extensive survey of sexual practices in the US. The encounters of the characters were much more likely to be recreational than relational, and their sexual scripts differ significantly from behavior that women actually report practicing. Yet for all the promotion of equal opportunity sexual freedom, by series end, all four characters were engaged in committed relationships—“happily ever after” endings for all!

Keywords

Sex and the City Sexual scripts Female sexuality Postfeminism Media studies 

References

  1. Akass, K., & McCabe, J. (2004). Ms. Parker and the vicious circle: Female narrative and humor in Sex and the City. In K. Akass & J. McCabe (Eds.), Reading sex and the city (pp. 177–198). NY: I.B. Taurus.Google Scholar
  2. Ang, I. (1990). Melodramatic identifications: Television fiction and women’s fantasy. In M. E. Brown (Ed.), Television and women’s culture: The politics of the popular (pp. 75–88). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Ang, I., & Hermes, J. (1991). Gender and/in media consumption. In J. Curran & M. Guevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 307–328). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  4. Alksnis, C., Desmarais, S., & Wood, E. (1996). Gender differences in scripts for different types of dates. Sex Roles, 34(5/6), 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthurs, J. (2003). Sex and the City and consumer culture: Remediating postfeminist drama. Feminist Media Studies, 3(1), 83–98.Google Scholar
  6. Arthurs, J. (2004). Television and sexuality: Regulation and the politics of taste. NY: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Atwood, J. D., & Dershowitz, S. (1992). Constructing a sex and marital therapy frame: Ways to help couples deconstruct sexual problems. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 18(3), 196–218.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, H. G. (1962). Sex and the single girl. NY: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, M. E. (1994). Conclusion: Consumption and resistance—the problem of pleasure. In M. E. Brown (Ed.), Television and women’s culture: The politics of the popular (pp. 201–210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (1990). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In S. Case (Ed.), Performing feminisms: Feminist critical theory and theatre (pp. 270–282). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Currie, D. H. (1999). Girl talk: Adolescent magazines and their readers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  12. Extreme Dating Tactics. (2007, May). Glamour, 169.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction, volume 1. NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  14. Frith, H., & Kitzinger, C. (2001). Reformulating sexual script theory: Developing a discursive psychology of sexual negotiation. Theory and Psychology, 11(2), 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  16. Gerhard, J. (2005). Sex and the City: Carrie Bradshaw’s queer postfeminism. Feminist Media Studies, 5(1), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heide, M. J. (1995). Television culture and women’s lives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hermes, J. (2006). Ally McBeal, Sex and the City and the tragic success of feminism. In J. Hollows & R. Moseley (Eds.), Feminism in popular culture (pp. 79–95). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  19. Hollows, J. (2000). Feminism, femininity and popular culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hollows, J., & Moseley, R. (2006). Popularity contests: The meanings of popular feminism. In J. Hollows & R. Moseley (Eds.), Feminism in popular culture (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  21. Jong, E. (1973). Fear of flying. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  22. Kellner, D. (1992). Popular culture and the construction of postmodern identities. In S. Lash & J. Friedman (Eds.), Modernity and identity (pp. 145–194). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (2000). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lotz, A. (2001). Postfeminist television criticism: Rehabilitating critical terms and identifying postfeminist attributes. Feminist Media Studies, 1(1), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahay, J., Laumann, E. O., & Michaels, S. (2005). Race, gender, and class in sexual scripts. In J. K. Davidson Sr. & N. B. Moore (Eds.), Speaking of sexuality: Interdisciplinary readings (pp. 144–158). Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  26. Make him want to be your boyfriend. (2006, September). Seventeen, 65(9), 99–101.Google Scholar
  27. Manca, L., & Manca, A. (1994). Introduction. In L. Manca & A. Manca (Eds.), Gender and utopia in advertising (pp. 1–4). Lisle, IL: Procopian Press.Google Scholar
  28. McRobbie, A. (1981). Just like a Jackie story. In A. McRobbie & T. McCabe (Eds.), Feminism for girls: An adventure story (pp. 113–128). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Richards, H. (2003). Sex and the City: A visible flaneuse for the postmodern era. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 17(2), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles’ contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28(9/10), 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. The seven levels of love. (2006, May). Glamour, 188–190.Google Scholar
  33. Simon, W. (1996). Postmodern sexualities. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1987). A sexual scripts approach. In J. H. Greer & W. T. O’Donahue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 363–83). NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  35. Whelehan, I. (2000). Overloaded: Popular culture and the future of feminism. London: The Women’s Press, Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations