Advertisement

Sexuality and Culture

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 3–17 | Cite as

On the limits of sexual ethics: The phenomenology of autassassinophilia

  • Lisa Downing
Articles

Abstract

Contemporary liberal discourse advocates tolerance of a diversity of sexual orientations and behaviors, provided that the principle of informed consent can be shown to have been respected. Borrowing an extreme test case used by the sexologist John Money—the reciprocally chosen lust murder pact—this theoretical article examines the limits of liberal ideology for sexual ethics. Using as its illustrative material the case of Sharon Lopatka, a Maryland woman who instigated her own sexual murder in 1996, it demonstrates that the phenomenon of being murdered for pleasure problematizes commonplace assumptions about the legitimacy to consent. The discussion recalls and refreshes existing debates in feminism and the politics of sadomasochism and reads them alongside the rhetoric surrounding the ethics of medically assisted suicide. Consenting to murder for pleasure is revealed as a formulation that exceeds the terms of informed consent as it is currently understood and thereby constitutes an ethical and logical aporia. In a final section, the phenomenology of consensual murder is explored via a reading of the dynamics of sexual activity and passivity in philosophical accounts by Jean-Paul Sartre and Martha Nussbaum, and a fictional text by Muriel Spark.

Keywords

Assisted Suicide Liberal Ideology Sexual Ethic Contemporary Reading Moral Absolutism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benjamin, J. (1990). The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism and the problem of domination. London: Virago.Google Scholar
  2. Cairns, G. (1996). Snuffsex: Transcription of broadcast. Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s News Radio Network. http://www.rusnecro.com/english/articles/snuffsex_article.htmlGoogle Scholar
  3. Freud, S. (1964). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis, lecture 33, Femininity. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works (Vol. 22, pp. 112–135). London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. (Original work published 1933).Google Scholar
  4. Hopkins, P. D. (1997). Rethinking sadomasochism: Feminism, interpretation and simulation in A. Soble (Ed.) The philosophy of sex: Contemporary readings (3rd ed., pp. 189–214). Oxford: Rowman and Little.Google Scholar
  5. Jackson, J. (1996) Murder she wrote. Cyberpunk archives, November 12. www.joabj.com/CityPaper/murder.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. Jeffreys, S. (1990). Anti-climax: A feminist perspective on the sexual revolution. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Money, J. (1979). Sexual dictatorship, dissidence, and democracy. International Journal of Medicine and the Law, 1, 11–20.Google Scholar
  8. Money, J. (1986). Lovemaps: Clinical concepts of sexual/erotic health and pathology, paraphilia, and gender transposition in childhood, adolescence, and maturity. Buffalo, New York: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  9. Nobus, D. (2003, May). Naming autassassinophilia: The value of Money. Unpublished paper presented at the Critical Sexology Seminar, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Objectification. In A. Soble (Ed.), The philosophy of sex: Contemporary readings (3rd ed., pp. 283–321). Oxford: Rowman and Little.Google Scholar
  11. Phillips, A. (1998). A defence of masochism. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  12. Rubin, G. (1987). The leather menace: Comments on politics and S/M. In SAMOIS, Coming to power; Writings and graphics on lesbian S/M (rev. ed., pp. 194–229). Boston: Alyson Publications inc.Google Scholar
  13. Sartre, J-P. (1957). Being and nothingness (H. Barnes. Trans.). London: Methuen. (Original work published 1943).Google Scholar
  14. Soble, A. (1996). Sexual investigations. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Solomon, R. (1997). Sexual paradigms. In A. Soble (Ed.), The Philosophy of sex: Contemporary readings (3rd ed., pp. 21–29). Oxford: Rowman and Little.Google Scholar
  16. Spark, M. (1970). The driver’s seat. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Truscott, C. (1991). S/M: Some questions and a few answers. In M. Thompson (Eds.), Leatherfolk: Radical sex, people, politics, and practice (pp. 15–36). Boston: Alyson Publications, inc.Google Scholar
  18. West, R. (1995). The harms of consensual sex. American Philosophical Association Newsletters, 93, (2), 52–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Downing
    • 1
  1. 1.Queen MaryUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations