Trends in Organized Crime

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 229–250 | Cite as

The symbiotic evolution of anti-doping and supply chains of doping substances: how criminal networks may benefit from anti-doping policy

  • Bertrand Fincoeur
  • Katinka van de Ven
  • Kyle J. D. Mulrooney
Article

Abstract

Doping in sport has been explored predominantly from a user-perspective, widely neglecting an analysis of the supply-side of the market for doping products. In this article, we aim to fill a gap in the existing literature by demonstrating that the supply chains of doping substances have evolved over the course of the past two decades, not least due to the zero tolerance approach of anti-doping policy. Specifically, adopting the case studies of (elite) cycling and recreational weight-training (RWT) and bodybuilding (BB), we outline how the supply chains for performance and image enhancing drugs (PIEDs) have shifted away from “culturally embedded dealers” and into new organizational structures independent from these sub-cultures. We maintain that the evolution of doping supply mirrors the evolution of doping use; whereas doping was previously the result of a socialization process, and PIED suppliers were a cultural product, consumption is now often a secretive practice and “social suppliers” are no longer prepared to take risks in (openly) supplying doping products. Consequently, the increasingly clandestine nature of doping practices has led consumers to increasingly consider the “black market” as a potential source for PIEDs. Most importantly, this shift in doping supply chains has led to greater inequality among athletes, increased health risks and the rise of suppliers devoid of sociocultural characteristics. We suggest that as the current anti-doping regime, focused predominantly on punishment and control, continues unabated these unintended negative consequences are likely to increase. As several countries have begun to rethink their position on the criminalization of drugs and drug users, it is time to rethink our approach to curbing the problem of doping in sports.

Keywords

Doping Anti-doping policy Supply Black market Cycling Weight-training Bodybuilding 

References

  1. Abadinsky H (2010) Organized crime, ninthth edn. Wadsworth CENGAGE Learning, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  2. Aspers P (2011) Markets. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Crime Commission (2011) Organised crime in Australia 2011. ACC, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker N (2014) Drugs: international comparators. Reducing drugs misuse and dependence. Home Office, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker HS (1963) Outsiders. Free Press, GlencoeGoogle Scholar
  6. Beckett K (1997) Making crime pay: law and order in contemporary American politics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Belackova V, Vaccaro CA (2013) “A friend with weed is a friend indeed”: understanding the relationship between friendship identity and market relations among marijuana users. J Drug Issues 43:289–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger P, Luckmann T (1986) La construction sociale de la réalité. Méridiens Klincksieck, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Bojsen-Møller J, Christiansen AV (2010) Use of performance- and image enhancing substances among recreational athletes: a quantitative analysis of inquiries submitted to the Danish anti-doping authorities. Scand J Med Sci Sports 20:861–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouchard M, Alain M, Nguyen H (2009) Convenient labour: the prevalence and nature of youth involvement in the cannabis cultivation industry. Int J Drug Pol 20(6):467–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brissonneau C (2007) Le dopage dans le cyclisme professionnel au milieu des années 1990: une reconstruction des valeurs sportives. Déviance Soc 31(2):129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brissonneau C, Ohl F (2010) The genesis and effect of French anti-doping policies in cycling. Int J Sport Pol Polit 2(2):173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brissonneau C, Aubel O, Ohl F (2008) L’épreuve du dopage. Sociologie du cyclisme professionnel. PUF, ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. Carrier JG (1990) Gifts in a world of commodities: the ideology of the perfect gift in American society. Soc Anal 29:19–37Google Scholar
  15. Caulkins JP, MacCoun R (2003) Limited rationality and the limits of supply reduction. J Drug Issues 33:435–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christiansen AV (2005) The legacy of Festina: patterns of drug use in European cycling since 1998. Sports Hist 25(3):497–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christiansen AV (2011) Bodily violations: testing citizens training recreationally in gyms. In: McNamee M, Møller V (eds) Doping and anti-doping in sport: ethical, legal and social perspectives. Routledge, London, pp 136–141Google Scholar
  18. Coakley J, Pike E (2009) Sport in society: issues and controversies. McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen S (1985) Visions of social control. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Commissie Anti-Doping (2013, July 7). Meedoen of stoppen. Eindrapport van de Commissie Anti-Doping Aanpak: onderzoek naar de dopingcultuur in het Nederlandse wegwielrennen bij de heren. Retrieved from http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/rapporten/2013/07/01/meedoen-of-stoppen.html
  21. Coomber R (2010) Reconceptualising drug markets and drug dealers - the need for change. Drugs Alcohol Today 10:10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coomber R (2013) How social fear of drugs in the non-sporting world creates a framework for doping policy in the sporting world. Int J Sport Pol 6(2):171–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Coomber R, Moyle L (2013) Beyond drug dealing: developing and extending the concept of ‘social supply’ of illicit drugs to ‘minimally commercial supply’. Drugs: Educ Prev Policy 21(2):157–164Google Scholar
  24. Coomber R, Turnbell P (2007) Arenas of drug transactions: adolescent cannabis transactions in England - Social supply. J Drug Issues 37(4):845–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cordaro FG, Lombardo S, Cosentino M (2011) Selling androgenic anabolic steroids by the pound: identification and analysis of popular websites on the Internet. Scand J Med Sci Sports 21(6):247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Costa AM (2008) Making drug control ‘fit for purpose’: building on the UNGASS decade. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  27. De Boer A, Van Haren SF, Hartgens F, De Boer D, Porsius AJ (1996) Onderzoek naar het gebruik van prestatieverhogende middelen bij bodybuilders in Nederland. Nederlands Centrum voor Dopingvraagstukken, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  28. De Hon O, Van Kleij R (2005) Een inventarisatie van de kwaliteit van illegaal verhandelde dopinggeduide middelen en de gezondheidsrisico’s bij gebruik. Nederlandse Centrum voor Dopingvraagstukken, Capelle aan den IJsselGoogle Scholar
  29. Decorte T (2010) The case for small-scale domestic cannabis cultivation. Int J Drug Pol 21:271–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Desroches F (2007) Research on upper-level drug trafficking: a review. J Drug Issues 37:828–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dimeo P (2009) The origins of anti-doping policy in sports : from public health to fair-play. In: Møller V, McNamee M, Dimeo P (eds) Elite sport, doping and public health. University Press of Southern Denmark, Odense, pp 29–40Google Scholar
  32. Donati A (2007) World traffic in doping substances. World Anti-Doping Agency, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  33. Dorn N, South N (1990) Drug markets and law enforcement. Br J Criminol 30(2):171–188Google Scholar
  34. Dunn M, White V (2011) The epidemiology of anabolic-androgenic steroid use among Australian secondary school students. J Sci Med Sport 14:10–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fainaru-Wada M, Lance W (2006) Game of shadows: Barry bonds, BALCO and the steroids scandal that rocked professional sports. Gotham, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Ferrell J, Hayward K, Young J (2008) Cultural criminology: an invitation. SAGE Publications Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Finckenauer JO (2009) Organized crime. In: Tonry M (ed) The Oxford handbook of crime and public policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 273–303Google Scholar
  38. Fincoeur B, Paoli L (2014) Des pratiques communautaires au marché du dopage. Evolution de la distribution des produits dopants dans le cyclisme. Déviance Soc 38(1):3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fincoeur, B., Frenger, M., & Pitsch, W. (2014). Does one play with the athletes’ health in the name of ethics. Performance Enhancement & Health. Online firstGoogle Scholar
  40. Foucault M (1977) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Pantheon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Gaumont P (2005) Prisonnier du dopage. Grasset, ParisGoogle Scholar
  42. Gezondheidsraad (Dutch Health Council) (2010) Dopinggebruik in de ongeorganiseerde sport. Gezondheidsraad, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  43. Global Commission (2011). War on drugs: report of the Global Commission on drug policy. Retrieved from http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/global-commission-report-english-20110624.pdf.
  44. Goode E (2011) Sports doping as deviance: anti-doping as moral panic. International Network of Humanistic Doping Research, AarhusGoogle Scholar
  45. Greenwald G (2009) Drug decriminalization in Portugal: lessons for creating fair and successful drug policies. Cato Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  46. Gus A (2008) ‘Gifts vs. commodity’ debate revisited. Anthropol Notebooks 14(1):81–102Google Scholar
  47. Hamilton T, Coyle D (2012) The secret race: inside the hidden world of the tour de France: doping, cover-ups, and winning at all costs. Bantam, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Hammersvik E, Sandberg S, Pedersen W (2012) Why small-scale cannabis growers stay small: five mechanisms that prevent small-scale growers from going large scale. Int J Drug Pol 23(6):458–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hanstad DV, Loland S (2009) Elite level athletes’ duty to provide information on their whereabouts: justifiable anti-doping work or an indefensible surveillance regime? Eur J Sport Sci 9(1):3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hanstad DV, Smith A, Waddington I (2008) The establishment of the world anti-doping agency: a study of the management of organizational change and unplanned outcomes. Int Rev Sociol Sport 43(3):227–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hoberman JM (2002) A pharmacy on wheels: doping and community cohesion among professional cyclists following the tour de France scandal of 1998. In: Møller V, Nauright J (eds) The essence of sport. University Press of Southern Denmark, Odense, pp 107–127Google Scholar
  52. Hough M, Natarajan M (2000) Introduction: illegal drug markets, research and policy. In: Hough M, Natarajan M (eds) Illegal drug markets: from research to policy. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  53. Houlihan B (2003) La victoire à quel prix? Le dopage dans le sport. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  54. Hughes C, Stevens S (2007) The effects of the decriminalization of drug use in Portugal. The Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  55. Jensen EL, Gerber J, Mosher C (2004) Social consequences of the war on drugs: the legacy of failed policy. Crim Justice Pol Rev 15(1):100–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kanayama G, Hudson J, Pope JHG (2010) Illicit anabolic-androgenic steroid use. Horm Behav 58(1):11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kayser B, Mauron A, Miah A (2007) Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal. BMC Med Ethics 8:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Koert AWA, Van Kleij R (1998) Handel in doping. Een verkennend onderzoek naar de handel in dopinggeduide middelen in Nederland. NeCeDo, Capelle aan de IJsselGoogle Scholar
  59. Kraska PB, Bussard CR, Brent JJ (2010) Trafficking in bodily perfection: examining the late-modern steroid marketplace and its criminalization. Justice Q 27(2):159–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Latty F (2007) La Lex Sportiva : Recherche sur le droit transnational. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Leifman H, Rehnman C, Sjoblom E, Holgersson S (2011) Anabolic androgenic steroids—use and correlates among gym users - an assessment study using questionnaires and observations at gyms in the Stockholm region. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8:2656–2674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Levi M (1998) Perspectives on ‘organised crime’: an overview. Howard J Crim Justice 37(4):335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mauss M (1967) The gift: forms and functions of exchange in Archaic societies. The Northon Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. May T, Hough M (2001) Illegal dealings: the impact of low-level police enforcement on drug markets. Eur J Crim Pol Res 9(2):137–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. May T, Hough M (2004) Drug markets and distribution systems. Addict Res Theory 12(6):549–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Maycock BR, Howat P (2007) Social capital: implication from an investigation of illegal anabolic steroid networks. Health Educ Res 22(6):854–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mazanov J, Connor J (2010) Rethinking the management of drugs in sport. Int J Sport Pol Polit 2(1):49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McNamee M, Tarasti L (2011) Ethico-legal aspects of anti-doping legislation. In: McNamee M, Møller V (eds) Doping and anti-doping in sport. Ethical, legal and social perspectives. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  69. Millar D (2012) Racing through the dark: the fall and rise of David Millar. Orion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  70. Mitsilegas V (2003) From national to global, from empirical to legal: the ambivalent concept of transnational organised crime. In: Beare ME (ed) Critical reflections on transnational organised crime, money laundering, and corruption. University of Toronto Press Incorporated, Toronto, pp 55–87Google Scholar
  71. Møller V (2005) Knud Enemark Jensen’s death during the 1960 Rome Olympics: a search for truth? Sport Hist 25(3):452–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Møller, V. (2013). Who guards the guardians? Int J Hist Sport. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2013.826652
  73. Monaghan LF (2001) Bodybuilding, drugs and risk. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  74. Mottram DR (2011) A historical perspective of doping and anti-doping in sport. In: Mottram DR (ed) Drugs in sport. Routledge, London, pp 21–34Google Scholar
  75. Mulrooney KJD (2012) Delinquency professionals: the influence, extension and adoption of the culture of control. The Oñati Socio-Legal Ser 2(1):1–48Google Scholar
  76. Mulrooney KJD, Van de Ven K (2013) The framing and managing of the doping threat: the WADA and the widening net of anti-doping [conference paper]. International network of humanistic doping research conference, AarhusGoogle Scholar
  77. Ohl, F., Fincoeur, B., Lentillon-Kaestner, V., Defrance, J., & Brissonneau, C. (2013). The socialization of young cyclists and the culture of doping. Int Rev Sociol Sport. Online firstGoogle Scholar
  78. Oldersma F, Snippe J, Bieleman B (2002) Doping en handel: Onderzoek naar aard en omvang van dopinghandel en ontwikkeling van indicatoren. Bureau Intraval, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  79. Paoli L (2004) The history of organized crime. In: Fijnaut C, Paoli L (eds) Concepts, patterns and control policies in the European Union and beyond. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–46Google Scholar
  80. Paoli L, Donati A (2014) The sports doping market. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Parker H (2000) How young Britons obtain their drugs: drug transactions at the point of consumption’. Crime Prev Stud 11:59–81Google Scholar
  82. Pearson G (2001) Normal drug use: ethnographic fieldwork among an adult network of recreational drug users in inner London. Subst Use Misuse 36(1–2):167–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pedersen IK (2010) Doping and the perfect body expert: social and cultural indicators of performance-enhancing drug use in Danish gyms. Sport Soc: Cult Commer Media Polit 13(3):503–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pope HG, Kanayama G, Hudson JI (2012) Risk factors for illicit anabolic-androgenic steroid use in male weightlifters: a cross-sectional cohort study. Biol Psychiatry 71:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Potter G (2009) Exploring retail-level drug distribution: social supply, ‘real’ dealers and the user/dealer interface. In: Demetrovics T, Fountain J, Kraus L (eds) Old and new policies, theories, research methods and drug users across Europe. Pabst Publications, LengerichGoogle Scholar
  86. Rothman DJ (1971) The discovery of the asylum: social order and disorder in the new republic. Little Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  87. Sallé L, Lestrelin L, Basson JC (2006) Le Tour de France 1998 et la régulation du dopage sportif : reconfiguration des rapports de forcer. Staps 73:9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sandberg S (2012) The importance of culture for cannabis markets. Br J Criminol 52:1133–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schneider A (2006) Cultural nuances: doping, cycling and the tour de France. Sport Soc 9:212–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sénat français (2013). Rapport fait au nom de la commission d’enquête sur l’efficacité de la lutte contre le dopage. Retrieved from http://www.senat.fr/rap/r12-782-1/r12-782-11.pdf
  91. Simon P, Striegel H, Aust F, Dietz K, Ulrich R (2006) Doping in fitness sports: estimated number of unreported cases and individual probability of doping. Addiction 101:1640–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Smith, A.C.T., & Stewart, B. (2008). Drug policy in sport: hidden assumptions and inherent contradictions. Drug Alcohol Rev, 1-21Google Scholar
  93. Snippe J, Ogier C, Naayer H, Bieleman B (2005) Stimulerende zaken opgespoord. Evaluatie wetswijziging bestrijding doping in de sport. Intraval, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  94. Soule B, Lestrelin L (2011) The Puerto Affair: revealing the difficulties of the fight against doping. J Sport Soc Issues 35(2):186–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. South N (1999) Debating drugs and everyday life: normalisation, prohibition and ‘otherness’. In: South N (ed) Drugs: cultures, controls and everyday life. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  96. Taverna N, Aubel O (2013) Vulnérabilités et risques organisationnels liés au dopage dans le cyclisme professionnel [conference paper]. the Association des Chercheurs en Activités Physiques et Sportives (ACAPS), GrenobleGoogle Scholar
  97. Taylor M, Potter GR (2013) From “social supply” to “real dealing”: drift, friendship, and trust in drug-dealing careers. J Drug Issues 43:392–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. The Guardian (2008, July 9). The Festina affair. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/sport/gallery/2008/jul/09/tourdefrance.cycling
  99. The Guardian (2014, October 7). Organised crime controls 25% of world sport, says World Anti-Doping Agency [video]. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/sport/video/2014/oct/07/organised-crime-sport-world-anti-doping-agency-video?utm_content=buffer90d54&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer.
  100. WADA (2009). 2009 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/finance/annual-report#.VE_hJb64l0s
  101. Waddington I (2000) Sport, health and drugs. A critical sociological perspective. Spon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  102. Waddington I, Smith A (2009) An introduction to drugs in sport : addicted to winning? Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  103. Webb JW, Tihanyi L, Duane Ireland R, Sirmon DG (2009) You say illegal, I say legitimate: entrepreneurship in the informal economy. Acad Manag Rev 34(3):492–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wolfgang ME, Ferracuti F (1967) The subculture of violence: toward an integrated theory in criminology. Tavistock, LondonGoogle Scholar
  105. Yesalis C, Bahrke M (2002) History of doping in sport. Int Sports Stud 24(1):42–76Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bertrand Fincoeur
    • 1
  • Katinka van de Ven
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kyle J. D. Mulrooney
    • 4
  1. 1.Leuven Institute of CriminologyUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social ResearchUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
  3. 3.Willem Pompe InstituteUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Doctorate in Cultural and Global Criminology (DCGC)University of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations