Trends in Organized Crime

, 11:326 | Cite as

Aspects of the evolution of extra-legal protection in Bulgaria (1989–1999)

Article

Abstract

In this paper I look at the interplay between organised crime, law, and the state and argue that the evolution of organised crime organisations in Bulgaria was shaped by the dynamic transformation of the legal and economic environment during the 90s, by policies of the state, such as, for example, the regulation of the private security and insurance industries (in 1994 and 1998 respectively), which mafia-like organisations used as fronts for their activities during the 90s and by the ability of organised crime organisations to adapt to the constantly changing conditions. In the first section of the paper I look at the emergence of the private security and private protection industries in Bulgaria with an emphasis on the development of organisations using the threat of violence to settle disputes, discourage competition, retrieve stolen property and collect debts. In the second section of the paper, I follow the transformation of certain type of private security companies into insurance companies, which directed their activities at properties liable to risk, for instance cars and small shops. They enjoyed an advantage over ordinary insurance companies because they possessed greater information about the risks, which could affect the property of their clients, for example theft (car theft in particular). The concluding section discusses the development of silovi grupirovki (the Bulgarian name for organised crime organisations) after 1998 when a very strict licensing regime for insurance companies was introduced and alleged to be mafia-like organisations were removed from the insurance market.

Keywords

Organised crime Mafia-like organizations Private security 

References

  1. Abadinsky H (2003) Organized crime. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelov S (2007) Devet milimetra. Istinskata istoria na balgarskata mafia. Sofia, 168chasaGoogle Scholar
  3. Barzel Y (2002) Theory of the state. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyadzhieva Y (1996) Prestupnostta v durzhavnaia sektor pri prekhoda kum pazarna ikonomika. Sofia: Ministerstvo na vutreshnite raboti, Nauchnoizsledovatelski institut po kriminalistika i kriminologiyaGoogle Scholar
  5. Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD) (2003) The drug market in Bulgaria. Centre for the Study of Democracy, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD) (2003) Neformalnata ikonomika v stranite-kandidatki za chlenstvo v EC (Informal Economy in the EU Candidate Countries). CSD, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD) (2004) Partners in crime. Centre for the Study of Democracy, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Centre for the Study of Democracy CSD (2004) Smuggling transportation and organised crime. Centre for the Study of Democracy, Sofia, Google Scholar
  9. Dixit AK (2004) Lawlessness and economics: alternative modes of governance. Princeton University Press, Princeton; OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Frye T (2000) Brokers and bureaucrats: building market institutions in Russia. Mich, University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  11. Frye T (2006) Reputation and the rule of law in Russia. in Workshop of joint research study group “EU economy” and EUIJ Tokyo Consortium, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  12. Frye T, Zhuravskaya E (2001) Rackets, regulation and the rule of law. Centre for Economic Policy Research, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Gambetta D (1993) The Sicilian Mafia: the business of private protection. Mass; London: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Google Scholar
  14. Gambetta D (2005) (published in 2006). Preface to the Spanish edition of the Sicilian Mafia. in La Mafia Siciliana. El negocio de la proteccion privada, Fondo de Cultura Economica.Google Scholar
  15. Gancheva Y (2000) Rules regulations and transaction costs in transition Bulgaria. Sofia, IMEGoogle Scholar
  16. Gounev P (2006) Bulgaria’s Private Security Industry. Pp. 109-128 in Private actors and security governance, edited by Alan Bryden and Marina Caparini. Geneva, LIT& Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces.Google Scholar
  17. Hill PBE (2003) The Japanese mafia: yakuza, law, and the state. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Ivanov H (2002) Ohranitelniyat biznes (Oxpaнитeлният бизнec/The business of private security). Sofia, AlbatrosGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobs JB, Friel C, Radick R (1999) Gotham unbound: how New York City was liberated from the grip of organized crime. New York; London, New York University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Knack S, Keefer P (1995) Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Econ Polit 7:207–227 doi:10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Adrei S, Robert V (1999) The quality of government. J Law Econ Organ 15:222–27 doi:10.1093/jleo/15.1.222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mantarova A (2000) Prestupnost i socialna transformatsiia: sotsiologicheski analizi. Sofia, Institut po sociologiia na BANGoogle Scholar
  23. Mauro P (1995) Corruption and growth. Q J Econ 110:681–71 doi:10.2307/2946696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milhaupt CJ, West MD (2000) The dark side of private ordering: an institutional and empirical analysis of organized crime. Univ Chic Law Rev 67:41–98 doi:10.2307/1600326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Minchev C (1992) Law, protection, services. Reference guide 1993. Sofia, MediakomGoogle Scholar
  26. Nikolov, Yovo (1997) Crime and corruption after Communism: organised crime in Bulgaria. East European Constitutional Review 6.Google Scholar
  27. Noev, Paskal (2002) Fenomenat na prehoda-silovoto zastrahovane (The Phenomenon of Transition: Violent Insurance). “Zastrahovatelen Pazar (special supplement to” Pari” newspaper, 22 November 2002).Google Scholar
  28. North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. North DC, Weingast B (1989) Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutional governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. J Econ Hist 49:803–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olson M (1993) Dictatorship, democracy, and development. Am Polit Sci Rev 87:567–576 doi:10.2307/2938736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Panev, Baycho. (1995) Vzriv na prestapnostta v Bulgaria (Crime explosion in Bulgaria). Novo vreme 6.Google Scholar
  32. Paunova S (1997) “VIS-2: trafformacionnite procesi po liniyata na biologiziranite harakteristiki.” in Sociology. Sofia, University of SofiaGoogle Scholar
  33. Petrova K (2006) Voynata na grupirovkite. Sofia, SlantseGoogle Scholar
  34. Pisarov N (1996) Bulgarskiyat oktopod. Vlast i mafia (Bulgarian Octopus: Power and the Mafia). Sofia, Emas and GlobusGoogle Scholar
  35. Prodanov, V (1995) Sotsiyalna sreda na prestapnostta v Bulgaria (The social environment of crime in Bulgaria). Novo vreme 6.Google Scholar
  36. SEESAC (2005) SALW and private secuirity companies in South-Eastern Europe: A cause or effect of insecurity. SEESAC, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  37. Stoychev, Tihomir (2004) “Globalizaciya i organizirana prestapnost (Globalisation and organised crime).” Novo Vreme special volume.Google Scholar
  38. Tadarakova S (2001) Krastnika i silnite (The Godfather and the Powerful). Sofia, TrudGoogle Scholar
  39. Volkov V (2002) Violent entrepreneurs. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Weingast B (1995) The economic role of political institutions: market preserving federalism and economic development. J Law Econ Organ 11:1–31Google Scholar
  41. Zarkova A (2005) Golemite ubiystva (The big murders). Sofia, TrudGoogle Scholar

Newspaper sources

  1. Trud, 4 Jan.1994, p.4Google Scholar
  2. Trud, 8 Sept. 1994Google Scholar
  3. Trud, 16 May1995Google Scholar
  4. Trud, 20 Sept.1994Google Scholar
  5. Trud, 13 Sept.1994Google Scholar
  6. Duma, 11 June 1994, p.5Google Scholar
  7. Trud, 13 Sept.1994, p.13Google Scholar
  8. Trud, 27 Sept.1994Google Scholar
  9. Trud, 23 Sept.1994Google Scholar
  10. Capital, 9–15 Dec.2000Google Scholar
  11. 24chasa, 4 Nov. 1994, p.3Google Scholar
  12. Trud, 4 Nov. 1994, p.11Google Scholar
  13. Trud, 12 Sept.1994Google Scholar
  14. See Kontinent, 16 May and 12 June 1995Google Scholar
  15. Trud, 5 Sept.1994 and 6 Sept.1994Google Scholar
  16. Trud, 8 Sept.1994Google Scholar
  17. 24 chasa, 2 June 1995, p.4Google Scholar
  18. Kontinent, 1 March 1996, p.3 and 21 June 1995, p.7.Google Scholar
  19. Trud, 8 Sept.1994Google Scholar
  20. 24 chasa, 8 April1995, p.14Google Scholar
  21. Trud, 23 Sept.1994Google Scholar
  22. 24 chasa, 30 Aug. 1994Google Scholar
  23. 168 chasa, 24 Oct. 1994, p.19Google Scholar
  24. 24 chasa, 6 Sept. 1994, p.8Google Scholar
  25. 24 chasa, 3 May 1995, p.11Google Scholar
  26. Sega, 22 Jan. 1999, p.10Google Scholar
  27. Reporter7, May 1995Google Scholar
  28. 24 chasa, 3 May 1995Google Scholar
  29. Novinar, 16 Oct. 1995Google Scholar
  30. Demokratsiya, 2 April.1995, p.9Google Scholar
  31. Reporter7, May 1995Google Scholar
  32. Duma, 5 Sept.1995Google Scholar
  33. Duma, 5 Sept.1995Google Scholar
  34. Trud, 24 chasa and Demokratsiya, 30 Oct.1996Google Scholar
  35. 24 chasa, 9 July 1996Google Scholar
  36. Duma, 13 March 1995Google Scholar
  37. Standart, 18 Dec.1994, p.12Google Scholar
  38. Reporter7, 6 Jan.1995Google Scholar
  39. Reporter7, May 1995Google Scholar
  40. 168 chasa, 7 March 1997Google Scholar
  41. Sega, 11 Jan.2007Google Scholar
  42. Capital, 6–12 Nov.1995, p.1–17Google Scholar
  43. Demokratsiya, 31 Dec. 1997Google Scholar
  44. Trud, 20 May 1998Google Scholar
  45. Trud and Kontinent, 1 Aug.1997Google Scholar
  46. Dnevnik, 17 Oct. 2005Google Scholar
  47. Kesh, 8–14 March 2002Google Scholar
  48. Tema, 8/2003, pg.19Google Scholar
  49. Standart, 17 Oct. 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nuffield CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations