Studies in Comparative International Development

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 415–450 | Cite as

Social Cleavages and Preferences for Government Redistribution in Contemporary China

  • Xian HuangEmail author


Public preferences for redistribution are important for policymaking in authoritarian countries such as China, where political legitimacy has relied heavily on improving the population’s well-being and is likely to be impaired by growing levels of social inequality. What are ordinary Chinese preferences for government redistribution? Do they differ from the public preferences observed in advanced industrialized economies, or are they similar to those found in other developing or post-communist countries? Drawing on the World Values Survey of China for 1990 to 2012 and a multilevel data analysis, I find that Chinese preferences for government redistribution vary significantly with income, occupation, and place of residence as existing studies of advanced industrialized democracies and other developing countries predict. Moreover, Chinese preferences notably fall along state–private sectoral and labor-market insider–outsider cleavages generated by the country’s state socialist legacy and its newly developed market economy. These findings suggest that in contemporary China, multiple social cleavages coexist and interweave in such a way as to fragment society without fracturing it along a single and deep class line. This study helps advance understanding of the societal foundations of redistributive policies and politics in China and in transitional societies with newly developed market economies in general.


Public preference Redistribution Inequality Social cleavage China 



  1. Alesina A, Angeletos GM. Fairness and redistribution. Am Econ Rev. 2005;95(4):960–80.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina A, Fuchs-Schundeln N. Good-bye Lenin (or not)? The effect of communism on people’s preferences. Am Econ Rev. 2007;97(4):1507–28.Google Scholar
  3. Alesina A, Giuliano P. The power of the family. Cambridge: Harvard University; 2008.Google Scholar
  4. Alesina A, Giuliano P. Preferences for redistribution. In J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, M. Jackson (Eds.), The handbook of social economics: Elsevier Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  5. Alesina A, La Ferrara E. Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. J Public Econ. 2005;89(5–6):897–931.Google Scholar
  6. Ansell B, Samuels D. Inequality and democratization: individual-level evidence of preferences for redistribution under autocracy. APSA 2011 annual meeting; 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Bates RH. Markets and states in tropical Africa: the political basis of agricultural policies. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1981.Google Scholar
  8. Benabou R, Ok EA. Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. Q J Econ. 2001;116(2):447–87.Google Scholar
  9. Bian Y. Work and inequality in urban China. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  10. Bian Y, Shu X, Logan JR. Communist party membership and regime dynamics in China. Soc Forces. 2001;79(3):805–41.Google Scholar
  11. Bray D. Social space and governance in urban China: the Danwei system from origin to reform. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Cameron D. The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1978;72(4):1243–61.Google Scholar
  13. Cavaille C, Trump KS. The two facets of social policy preferences. J Polit. 2015;77(1):146–60.Google Scholar
  14. Chung J, Lai H, Xia M. Mounting challenges to governance in China: surveying collective protestors, religious sects and criminal organizations. China J. 2006;56(July):1–31.Google Scholar
  15. Corneo G. Inequality and the state: comparing US and German preferences. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique. 2001;63-64:283–96.Google Scholar
  16. Corneo G, Gruner HP. Individual preferences for political redistribution. J Public Econ. 2002;83(1):83–107.Google Scholar
  17. Cramer BD, Kaufman RR. Views of economic inequality in Latin America. Comp Polit Stud. 2010;44(9):1206–37.Google Scholar
  18. Cusack T, Iversen T, Rehm P. Risks at work: the demand and supply sides of government redistribution. Oxf Rev Econ Policy. 2006;22(3):365–89.Google Scholar
  19. Dollar D, Kraay A. Growth is good for the poor. J Econ. 2002;7(3):195–225.Google Scholar
  20. Finseraas H. Income inequality and demand for redistribution: a multilevel analysis of European public opinion. Scand Polit Stud. 2009;32(1):94–119.Google Scholar
  21. Frazier M. Socialist insecurity: pensions and the politics of uneven development in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  22. Gallagher M, Giles J, Park A, Wang M. China’s 2008 labor contract law: implementation and implications for China’s workers. Hum Relat. 2014;68(2):197–235.Google Scholar
  23. Gao Q, Yang S, Li S. Labor contracts and social insurance participation among migrant workers in China. China Econ Rev. 2012;23(4):1195–205.Google Scholar
  24. Garrett G. Partisan politics in the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  25. Gelman A, Hill J. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  26. Gordon DM, Edwards RC, Reich M, editors. Segmented work, divided workers. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1982.Google Scholar
  27. Haggard S, Kaufman RR, Long JD. Income, occupation, and preferences for redistribution in the developing world. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2013;48(2):113–40.Google Scholar
  28. Han, C. Whyte, MK. The social contours of distributive injustice feelings in contemporary China. In Creating wealth and poverty in postsocialist China, edited by Deborah S. and Wang D. F. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2009.Google Scholar
  29. He Q. A volcanic stability. J Democracy. 2003;14(1):66–72.Google Scholar
  30. Honaker JK, Gary BM. Amelia II: a program for missing data. J Statistical Software. 2011; 45(7).Google Scholar
  31. Huang X. The politics of social welfare reform in urban China: social welfare preferences and reform policies. J Chinese Polit Sci. 2013;18(1):61–85.Google Scholar
  32. Huang X. Expansion of Chinese social health insurance: who gets what, how and when? J Cont China. 2014;23(89):923–51.Google Scholar
  33. Huang X. Four worlds of welfare in China: understanding subnational variation in Chinese social health insurance. China Q. 2015;222(June):449–74.Google Scholar
  34. Huang Y. Capitalism with Chinese characteristics: entrepreneurship and the state. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  35. Hurst W. Rebuilding the urban Chinese welfare state. China Perspectives. 2011;2:35–42.Google Scholar
  36. Iversen T, Soskice D. An asset theory of social policy preferences. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2001;95(4):875–93.Google Scholar
  37. Jowitt K. New world disorder: the Leninist extinction. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  38. King G, Honaker J, Joseph A, Scheve K. Analyzing incomplete political science data: an alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2001;95(1):49–69.Google Scholar
  39. Lee PNS, Wong CK. The tale of two cities: rolling back the boundary of the welfare state during the reform era. In: Lee PNS, Lo CWH, editors. Remarking China’s public management. Westport: Quorum Books; 2001.Google Scholar
  40. Lipsmeyer CS. Welfare and the discriminating public: evaluating entitlement attitudes in post-communist Europe. Policy Stud J. 2003;31(4):545–64.Google Scholar
  41. Lü X. Does changing economic well-being shape resentment about inequality in China? Stud Comp Int Dev. 2014;49(3):300–20.Google Scholar
  42. Lü X, Perry E, editors. Danwei: the changing Chinese workplace in historical and comparative perspective. Armonk: M.E.Sharpe; 1997.Google Scholar
  43. Lu Y, Wang F. From general discrimination to segmented inequality: migration and inequality in urban China. Soc Sci Res. 2013;42(6):1443–56.Google Scholar
  44. Lipton M. Why poor people stay poor: urban bias in world development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1977.Google Scholar
  45. Mares I. The politics of social risk: business and welfare state development. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  46. Meltzer AH, Richard SF. A rational theory of the size of government. J Polit Econ. 1981;89(Oct.):914–27.Google Scholar
  47. Moene K, Wallerstein M. Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2001;95(4):859–74.Google Scholar
  48. Piketty T. Social mobility and redistributive politics. Q J Econ. 1995;110(3):551–84.Google Scholar
  49. Pop-Eleches GT, Joshua A. Communism’s shadow: historical legacies and contemporary political attitudes. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2017.Google Scholar
  50. Ravallion M, Chen S. China’s uneven progress against poverty. J Dev Econ. 2007;82:1–42.Google Scholar
  51. Rehm P. Risks and redistribution: an individual-level analysis. Comp Polit Stud. 2009;42(7):855–81.Google Scholar
  52. Rudra N, Haggard S. Globalization, democracy, and effective welfare spending in the developing world. Comp Polit Stud. 2005;38(9):1015–49.Google Scholar
  53. Shambaugh DL. The Chinese state in the post-Mao era. In: Shambaugh DL, editor. The modern Chinese state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  54. Scheve K, Stasavage D. Religion and preferences for social insurance. Q J Polit Sci. 2006;1(3):255–86.Google Scholar
  55. Smyth R, Mishra V, Qian X. Knowing one’s lot in life versus climbing the social ladder: the formation of redistributive preferences in urban China. Soc Indic Res. 2010;96(2):275–93.Google Scholar
  56. Tian W. Sheng yu jumin shouru jini xishu cesuan ji qi biandong qushi fenxi [Provincial income gini coefficient estimate and changing trend analysis] Jingji Kexue [Economics] 2012 (2), 48–59.Google Scholar
  57. Wallace J. Cities and stability: urbanization, redistribution, & regime survival in China. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  58. Wang F. Boundaries and categories: rising inequality in post-socialist urban China. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  59. Whyte MK. Myth of the social volcano: percaptions of ineuqality and distributive injustice in contemporary China. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  60. Whyte MK. China’s dormant and active social volcanoes. China J. 2016;75(January):9–37.Google Scholar
  61. Whyte MK, Im DK. Is the social volcano still dormant? Trends in Chinese attitudes toward inequality. Soc Sci Res. 2014;48(November):62–7.Google Scholar
  62. World Bank. China national development and sub-national finance: a review of provincial expenditures. Washington: World Bank; 2002.Google Scholar
  63. Zhang Z, Wu X. Occupational segregation and earnings inequality: rural migrants and local workers in urban China. Soc Sci Res. 2017;61(January):57–74.Google Scholar
  64. Zhou X. The state and life chances in urban China: redistribution and stratification, 1949–1994. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  65. Zhu Y. “Performance legitimacy” and China’s political adaptation strategy. J Chinese Polit Sci. 2011;16(2):123–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations