Utilizing FDI to Stay Ahead: The Case of Singapore

  • Penelope B. PrimeEmail author


A country of 5 million people in 710 km2, Singapore has built itself into an integral part of global markets with living standards that are among the highest in the world. The purpose of this article is to apply a capabilities-based approach to understand how a small, resource-scarce country dependent on global markets has done so well. The core of Singapore’s success has been the continuous updating and expanding of domestic social capabilities to meet the needs of foreign companies. Government policies were hypersensitive to providing conditions for foreign firms to be successful. Foreign firms investing in Singapore by now have helped close the income gap with advanced economies and are on the way to closing the innovation gap. Singapore demonstrates that with deliberate attention to building skills, institutions and infrastructure, it is possible for a small country to upgrade skills and to move up the production-value chain with primary reliance on foreign direct investment (FDI). Cultivation of private Singaporean firms has been secondary but may be the next step needed to sustain progress, both to respond to increased competition from China and others, and to build a knowledge-based economy.


Capabilities-based approach Singapore Small country development Upgrading Structural change 



The author wishes to thank Aaron Kosel for his research assistance and Eva Paus, Luis Abugattas, José Cordero, Esteban Pérez Caldentey, and Diego Sanchez-Ancochea for their helpful comments throughout the project.


  1. Abramovitz M. Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. J Econ Hist. 1986;46(2):385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akkemik KA. Labor productivity and inter-sectoral reallocation of labor in Singapore (1965–2002). GE, Growth, Math methods 0510005, EconWPA. Forum of Int Dev Stud. 2005;30 (September). Available at
  3. Athukorala PC. Singapore and ASEAN in the new regional division of labor. Singapore Econ Rev. 2008;53(3):479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beng CH. Can governments engineer the transition from cheap labour to skill-based competitiveness? The case of Singapore. In: Godfrey M, editor. Skill development for international competitiveness. Cheltenhan, UK: Edward Elgar; 1997. p. 92–138.Google Scholar
  5. Birkinshaw J, Hood N. Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Acad Manage Rev. 1998;23(4):773–95.Google Scholar
  6. Blomqvist HC. Development Policies of Singapore: Dynamics of Internationalism versus Regionalism. University of Vaasa Working Paper No. 275. 2000 (September). Available at SSRN: or doi: 10.2139/ssrn.248489.
  7. Brown K, Tucker S. A high-flying rivalry. Financial Times. 2010. Available at
  8. Chang H. The East Asian development experience. In: Chang HJ, editor. Rethinking development economics. London: Anthem Press; 2003. p. 107–24.Google Scholar
  9. Chia SY. The Singapore model of industrial policy: past evolution and current thinking. Paper presented at the second LAEBA Annual Conference, Buenos Aires. 2005 (November);28–29.Google Scholar
  10. CIA Factbook.
  11. Doner RF. The politics of uneven development: Thailand’s economic growth in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  12. Economic Development Board.
  13. Encyclopedia of the Nations.
  14. Farhoomand A, Tsang S. National innovation systems of China and the Asian newly industrialised economics: a comparative analysis. HKU392, Hong Kong: 2005. This case is available through the Asia Case Research Centre at url:
  15. Fouquin M. Regionalization in East Asia. Econ Change Restruct. 2008;41:289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geok WB. Government-linked companies and other organisations in Singapore 2004. Singapore: The Asian Business Case Centre, Nanyang Technological University; 2004.Google Scholar
  17. Ghesquiere H. Singapore’s success: engineering economic growth. Singapore: Thomson Learning; 2007.Google Scholar
  18. Ho KC. Attracting and retaining investments in uncertain times: Singapore in South-east Asia. Urban Stud. 2003;40(2):21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoon HT, Ho KW. The changing pattern of production fragmentation in Singapore and its economic consequences. In: Cheng LK, Kierzkowski H, editors. Global production and trade in East Asian. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 325–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kemeny T. Does foreign direct investment drive technological upgrading? World Dev. 2010;38(11):1543–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lall S. Technology and industrial development in the era of globalization. In: Chang HJ, editor. Rethinking development economics. London: Anthem Press; 2003. p. 277–98.Google Scholar
  22. Lall S. Rethinking industrial strategy: the role of the state in the face of globalization. In: Gallager K, editor. Putting development first. London: Zed Books; 2005. p. 33–68.Google Scholar
  23. Lim C. Southeast Asia: the long road ahead. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.; 2001.Google Scholar
  24. Lim H, Wei LT. Sustainable development impacts of investment incentives: a case study of the pharmaceutical industry in Singapore. Trade Knowledge Network Paper, Singapore Institute of International Affairs. 2010. Available at
  25. Lin H, Lin ES. FDI, trade, and product innovation: theory and evidence. Southern Econ J. 2010;77(2):434–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu Y. Facing the challenge of rising China: Singapore’s responses. J Policy Model. 2007;29:505–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Low L. The role of government in Singapore’s industrialization. In: Jomo KS, editor. Southeast Asia’s industrialization: industrial policy, capabilities and sustainability. Houndsmills, England: Palgrave; 2001. p. 113–128.Google Scholar
  28. Ong C. Albert Winsemius. Singapore National Library, Singapore Infopedia. 2009. Retrieved 8 February 2011.
  29. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary. 2010. Available at Retrieved 17 January 2010.
  30. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Science Technology Industry: Knowledge-based Industries in Asia. Paris, France: OECD Publications; 2000. Available at
  31. Parayil G. From ‘Silicon Island’ to ‘Biopolis of Asia’: innovation policy and shifting competitive strategy in Singapore. Calif Manage Rev. 2005;47(2(Winter)):50–73.Google Scholar
  32. Pereira A. Singapore’s regionalization strategy. J Asia-Pacific Econ. 2005;10(3):380–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramirez CD, Tan LH. Singapore, Inc. versus the private sector: are government-linked companies different? IMF Working Paper WP/03/156 (July). Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund. 2003. Available at
  34. Respondek A. Singapore: an emerging regional hub for biomedical sciences — Part II. 2008.
  35. Schrank A. Homeward bound? Interest, identity, and investor behavior in a Third World export platform. Am J Sociol. 2008;114:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sheth JN. Interview in Atlanta, GA. 2009.Google Scholar
  37. Singapore Agency for Science, Technology and Research. National Survey of R&D 2010.; December, 2011. Retrieved 28 February 2012.
  38. Singapore Department of Statistics, Last retrieved February 2012.
  39. Singapore Ministry of Trade and Industry, Economic Review Committee,
  40. Stubbs R. Rethinking Asia’s economic miracle. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.Google Scholar
  41. van Elkan R. Singapore development strategy. In: Bercuson K, editor. Singapore: a case study in rapid development. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 1995. p. 11–9.Google Scholar
  42. Vietor RHK, Thompson EJ. Singapore Inc. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Case 9-703-040. 2006: March 14.Google Scholar
  43. Wong PK. From using to creating technology: the evolution of Singapore’s national innovation system and the changing role of public policy. In: Lall S, Urata S, editors. Competitiveness, FDI and technological activity in East Asia. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2003. p. 239–67.Google Scholar
  44. World Bank. Ease of Doing Business 2010: Reforming through difficult times. Washington DC: The World Bank, IFC and Palgrave MacMillan. 2010. Available at Retrieved January 2012.
  45. World Bank, World Development Indicators, Retrieved January 2012.
  46. World Trade Organization (WTO) Trade Policy Review: Report by the Secretariat: Singapore. WT/TPR/S/202 June 2008. Retrieved April 2011.Google Scholar
  47. Young AA. Tale of two cities: factor accumulation and technical change in Hong Kong and Singapore. NBER Macroeconomic Annual 1992. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  48. Yusuf S, Nabeshima K. Tiger economies under threat: a comparative analysis of Malaysia’s industrial prospects and policy options. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2009.Google Scholar
  49. Yusuf S, Nabeshima K, Yamashita S. Growing industrial clusters in Asia: serendipity and science. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stetson School of Business & EconomicsMercer UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations