Gaining Access to Public Services and the Democratic State in India: Institutions in the Middle



How and to what extent do different citizens experience democratic governance on a day-to-day basis? What agencies do they utilize in order to have their voices heard and grievances addressed? How do they gain access to government agencies responsible for delivering social welfare services, such as education, security, health care, and poverty relief? Investigations conducted in two states of India inquired about the manner in which different social groups living in rural areas gain access to the welfare services of the Indian state. These results show that an intermediary is required for gaining access. Different types of intermediaries are consulted by separate segments of society. For a large majority of poorer individuals, a newly arisen type of mediator, the naya neta (literally, new leader), is the intermediary of choice. Neither usually low status nor high status, but younger and better educated than other types of village leaders, naya netas play important roles in shaping welfare consequences in these villages of Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh, most importantly, by affecting equity of access.


Democracy Social welfare Equity of access Intermediary institutions India 


  1. Ake C. Democracy and development in Africa. Washington: The Brookings Institution; 1996.Google Scholar
  2. Almond G, Verba S. The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Boston: Little, Brown; 1965.Google Scholar
  3. Ananthpur K. Rivalry or synergy? Formal and informal local governance in rural India. Dev Change. 2007;38(3):401–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apter DE. The politics of modernization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1965.Google Scholar
  5. Bailey FG. Politics and social change: Orissa in 1959. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1963.Google Scholar
  6. Bates RH. Ethnicity, capital formation, and conflict. Social capital initiative working paper no. 12. Washington: The World Bank; 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Béteille A. Caste, class and power: Changing patterns of stratification in a Tanjore village. Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  8. Bird RM, Vaillancourt F. Fiscal decentralization in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  9. Blair H. Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Dev. 2000;28(1):21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Booth JA, Seligson MA. Peasants as activists: A re-evaluation of political participation in the countryside. Comp Polit Stud. 1979;12:29–59.Google Scholar
  11. Bratton M, Mattes R. Africans’ surprising universalism. J Democr. 2001;12:107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakravarty A. Contradiction and change: Emerging patterns of authority in a Rajasthani village. Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1975.Google Scholar
  13. Chandra K. The transformation of ethnic politics in India: The decline of the congress and the rise of the Bahujan Samaj Party in Hoshiarpur. J Asian Stud. 2000;59(1):26–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheema GS, Rondinelli DA. Decentralization and development: Policy implementation on developing countries. New Delhi: Sage; 1983.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen JM, Peterson SB. Administrative decentralization: Strategies for developing countries. West Hartford: Kumarian Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  16. Collier RB. Paths toward democracy: The working class and elites in Western Europe and South America. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  17. Corbridge S, Williams G, Srivastava M, Veron R. Seeing the state: Governance and governmentality in India. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crook RC, Manor J. Democracy and decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, accountability and performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Dahl RA. Polyarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1971.Google Scholar
  20. Diamond L. The democratic rollback: The resurgence of the predatory state. Foreign Aff. 2008;87(2):36–48.Google Scholar
  21. Diamond L, Linz JJ, Lipset SM. Politics in developing countries: Comparing experiences with democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner; 1995.Google Scholar
  22. Dreze J, Sen A. India: Development and participation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  23. Etzioni A. A moral reawakening without puritanism. In: Etzioni, editor. The essential communitarian reader. New York: Rowman and Littlefield; 1998. p. 41–6.Google Scholar
  24. Finkel, S.E. Civic education and the mobilization of political participation in developing democracies. J Polit. 2002;64:994–1020.Google Scholar
  25. Frankel F, Rao MSA, editors. Dominance and state power in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1989.Google Scholar
  26. Fuller CJ, Benei V, editors. The everyday state and society in modern India. New Delhi: Social Science Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  27. Fuller CJ, Harriss J. For an anthropology of the modern Indian state. In: Fuller CJ, Benei V, editors. The everyday state and society in modern India. New Delhi: Social Science Press; 2000. p. 1–30.Google Scholar
  28. Fung A, Wright EO. Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Polit Soc. 2001;29(1):5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goetz A-M, Jenkins R. Reinventing accountability: Making democracy work for the poor. London: Macmillan; 2004.Google Scholar
  30. Heller P. Moving the state: The politics of democratic decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre. Polit Soc. 2001;29(1):131–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huntington SP. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1968.Google Scholar
  32. Inglehart R, Baker WE. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. Am Sociol Rev. 2000;65(1):19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Januzzi F. India’s persistent dilemma: The political economy of agrarian reform. Boulder: Westview; 1994.Google Scholar
  34. Jeffrey C, Jeffery P, Jeffery R. Degrees without freedom: Education, masculinities, and unemployment in North India. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  35. Kohli A. The state and poverty in India: The politics of reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kohli A. Democracy and discontent: India’s growing crisis of governability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  37. Kremer M, Chaudhury N, Rogers F, Muralidharan K, Hammer J. Teacher absence in India: A snapshot. J Eur Econ Assoc. 2004;3(2–3):658–67.Google Scholar
  38. Krishna A. Active social capital: Tracing the roots of development and democracy. New York: Columbia University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  39. Krishna A. What is happening to caste? A view from Some North Indian Villages. J Asian Stud. 2003;62(4):1171–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krishna A. Escaping poverty and becoming poor: Who gains, who loses, and why? People’s assessments of stability and change in 35 North Indian Villages. World Dev. 2004;32(1):121–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krishna A. Poverty and democratic participation reconsidered. Comp Polit. 2006a;38(4):439–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Krishna A. Pathways out of and into poverty in 36 villages of Andhra Pradesh, India. World Dev. 2006b;34(2):271–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Krishna A, Booth J. Conclusion: Implications for policy and research. In: Krishna A, editor. Poverty, participation and democracy: A global perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Krishna A, Shariff A. The irrelevance of national strategies? Rural poverty dynamics in states and regions of India, 1993–2005. World Dev. 2011;39(4).Google Scholar
  45. Lerner D. The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: Free Press; 1958.Google Scholar
  46. Lipset SM. Political man: The social bases of politics. revisedth ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1981.Google Scholar
  47. Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage; 1980.Google Scholar
  48. Manor J. The political economy of democratic decentralization. Washington: World Bank; 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Manor J. Small-time political fixers in India’s states. Asian Surv. 2000;40(5):816–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mathew G. Panchayati Raj: From legislation to movement. New Delhi: Concept Publishers; 1994.Google Scholar
  51. Mayaram S. Panchayats and Women: A study of the processes initiated before and after the 73rd Amendment in Rajasthan. Jaipur: Institute of Development Studies, mimeo; 1998.Google Scholar
  52. Mayer A. Caste in an Indian Village: Change and continuity 1954–1992. In: Fuller CJ, editor. Caste today. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  53. Migdal J. Strong societies and weak states. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  54. Mitra S. Room to maneuver in the middle: Local elites, political action, and the state in India. World Polit. 1991;43(April):390–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nie N, Junn J, Stehlik-Barry K. Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  56. Posner DN. Institutions and ethnic politics in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  57. PROBE. Public report on basic education in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  58. Przeworksi A, Alvarez M, Chiebub JA, Limongi F. Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  59. Putnam R. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  60. Rakove ML. Don’t make no waves, don’t back no losers: An insider’s analysis of the Daley machine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1975.Google Scholar
  61. Reddy GR, Haragopal G. The Pyraveerkar: The fixer in rural India. Asian Surv. 1985;25(11):1147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rudolph LI, Rudolph SH. In search of Lakshmi: The political economy of the Indian state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  63. Rueschemeyer D, Stephens EH, Stephens JD. Capitalist development and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  64. Satterthwaite D. The role of federations formed by the urban poor in communal asset accumulation. Paper presented at the Brookings Institution/Ford Foundation Workshop on Asset-Based Approaches to Poverty Reduction in a Globalized Context, Washington DC, June 27–28 2006.Google Scholar
  65. Seligson MA, Booth JA, editors. Politics and the poor: Political participation in Latin America. New York: Holmes and Meier; 1979.Google Scholar
  66. Tarrow S. Between center and periphery: Grassroots politicians in Italy and France. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1977.Google Scholar
  67. Tendler J. Good government in the tropics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  68. Tsai LL. Solidary groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in rural China. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2007;101(2):355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Varshney A. Ethnic conflict and civil society: India and beyond. World Polit. 2001;53:362–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Verba S, Schlozman KL, Brady H. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  71. Weiner M. Political change in South Asia. Calcutta: K.L. Mukhopadhyaya; 1963.Google Scholar
  72. Wilkinson S. Votes and violence: Electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  73. Yadav Y. Electoral politics in the time of change: India’s third electoral system, 1989–99. Econ Polit Wkly (Bombay). 1999;34:2391–9.Google Scholar
  74. Yadav Y. Understanding the second democratic upsurge: Trends of Bahujan participation in electoral politics in the 1990s. In: Frankel F, Hasan Z, Bhargava R, Arora B, editors. Transforming India: Social and political dynamics of democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 120–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Public Policy and Political ScienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations