More Rights, Less Power: Labor Standards and Labor Markets in East European Post-communist States



This paper examines changes in labor markets and labor rights for 13 post-communist states of East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union. It focuses on the simultaneous pressures to increase the flexibility of labor markets and improve labor standards in the years since the collapse of communism. Comparative measures and patterns of both de jure and de facto standards and flexibility are presented, and the roles of key institutional promoters of change are analyzed. I find that a combination of democratic regime type and European Union accession has pulled East European states toward the strengthening of collective labor rights. The effect is strongest on the states that joined the EU in 2004, weaker for those joining in 2007, while the three post-Soviet, non-accession states remain significantly more labor-repressive. Labor market flexibilization has been a more uniform trend in the post-communist region. In the context of this project’s inter-regional comparisons, contemporary Eastern Europe has the strongest labor rights. At the same time, the decline of trade unions and limits of collective bargaining in most post-communist states undermine the effectiveness of transposed EU legislation and bargaining institutions in empowering labor. As shown by the exceptional case of Slovenia, strong unions are necessary to fully enforce rights.


Labor standards Flexibility Labor reform Eastern Europe 



The author would like to thank Marsha Pripstein Posusney, Cornel Ban, Katrina Burgess, Melani Cammett, Teri Caraway, Douglas Lippoldt, Mark Morales, and Barbara Stallings for comments at various stages of the writing and Bongani Ngqulunga, Yuri Zhukov, Kenta Tsuda, Francisco Resnicoff, Tiberiu-Lucian Florea, and Gavril Bilev for invaluable research assistance. Support from the Ford Foundation and the Watson Institute is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Barr N. Labor markets and social policy in central and Eastern Europe: the accession and beyond. Washington: World Bank; 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohle D, Greskovits B. Capitalism without compromise: strong business and weak labor in Eastern Europe’s new transnational industries. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2006;41(1):3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bronstein A. The new labour law of the Russian Federation. Int Labour Rev. 2005;144(3):91–318.Google Scholar
  4. Compa L, Lyle F. Justice for all: a guide to worker rights in the global economy. Washington: American Center for International Labor Solidarity/AFL-CIO; 2003.Google Scholar
  5. Cazes S, Nesporova A. Labor markets in transition: balancing flexibility and security in Central and Eastern Europe. Geneva: ILO; 2003.Google Scholar
  6. Cook LJ. The Soviet social contract and why it failed: workers’ politics and welfare policy from Brezhnev to Gorbachev. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  7. Cook LJ. Postcommunist welfare states: reform politics in Russia and Eastern Europe. Ithaca: Cornell; 2007a.Google Scholar
  8. Cook LJ. Negotiating welfare in postcommunist states. Comp Polit. 2007b;40(1):41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowley S. Hot coal, cold steel: Russian and Ukrainian workers from the end of the Soviet Union to the postcommunist transformation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Crowley S, Ost D, editors. Workers after workers’ states: labor and politics in postcommunist Eastern Europe. New York: Rowman and Littlefield; 2001.Google Scholar
  11. Dimitrova D, Vilrokx J. Trade union strategies in Central and Eastern Europe: towards decent work. Budapest: ILO; 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Eamets R, Masso J. The paradox of the Baltic states: labor market flexibility but protected workers. Eur J Ind Relat. 2005;11(1):71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott KA, Freeman RB. Can labor standards improve under globalization? Washington: Institute for International Economics; 2003.Google Scholar
  14. European Industrial Relations Observatory. Tripartite commission discusses amendments to (Poland’s) labour code. Available at:; 2002a.
  15. European Industrial Relations Observatory. New labour code takes effect (in Slovak Republic). Available at:; 2006b.
  16. European Industrial Relations Observatory. New flexible labour code comes into force (in Poland). Available at:; 2002c.
  17. European Industrial Relations Observatory. Major amendment of (Hungary’s) labour code comes into effect. Available at:; 2002d.
  18. European Union. European employment strategy. Available at:; 1997.Google Scholar
  19. Gans-Morse J, Orenstein M. The emergence of continental–liberal welfare regimes in postcommunist Europe. Draft paper; 2007.Google Scholar
  20. Hunter W, Brown D. World Bank directives, domestic interests, and the politics of human capital investment in Latin America. Comp Polit Stud. 2002;33(1):113–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iankova E. Transformation, accession to the European Union, and institutional design: the fate of tripartism. In: Linden RH, editor. Norms and nannies: the impact of international organizations on the Central and East European states. New York: Rowman and Littlefield; 2002. p. 205–26.Google Scholar
  22. IMF. Statement of the government of the Russian Federation and Central Bank of Russia on economic policies.; July 13, 1999.
  23. IMF. Letters of intent/memoranda of economic policies (various countries, various years) at:
  24. ILO. Forced labor: facts and figures: the costs of coercion: regional perspectives. Geneva: ILO; 2009.Google Scholar
  25. International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC). Annual survey of violations of trade union rights. Available at: http://survey08.ituc-csi/survey.php?ID_Continent=4&Lang=Eng; 2008.
  26. Keune M. EU enlargement and social standards: exporting the European social model? In: Orbie J, Tortell L, editors. The EU and the social dimension of globalization. New York: Routledge; 2009.Google Scholar
  27. Kubicek PJ. Organized labor in postcommunist states: from solidarity to infirmity. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh; 2004.Google Scholar
  28. Mosley P, Harrigan J, Toye J. Aid and power: the World Bank and policy-based lending, vol. 1: analysis and policy proposals. New York: Routledge; 1991.Google Scholar
  29. OECD. Jobs Study Part II: the adjustment potential of the labor market. Available at:; 1994.
  30. OECD. Labor market and social politics in the Baltic countries. Available at:; 2003.
  31. Orenstein MA. Privatizing pensions: the transnational campaign for social security reform. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  32. Ost D. Illusory corporatism in Eastern Europe: neoliberal tripartism and postcommunist class identities. Polit Soc. 2000;20(4):503–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ost D. The end of postcommunism: trade unions in Eastern Europe’s future. East Eur Polit Soc. 2009;23(1):13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pollert A. Gender, transformation and employment in Central Eastern Europe. Eur J Ind Relat. 2005;11(2):213–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robertson GB. Strikes and organized labor in hybrid regimes. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2007;101(4):781–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sissinich B. The diffusion of EU social and employment legislation in Poland and Hungary. In: Linden RH, editor. Norms and nannies: the impact of international organizations on the Central and East European states. New York: Rowman and Littlefield; 2002. p. 287–316.Google Scholar
  37. Stanojevic M. Avoiding shock therapy: trade unions’ role in the transition to a market economy in Slovenia. In: Dimitrova D, Vilrokx J, editors. Trade union strategies in Central and Eastern Europe: towards decent work. Budapest: ILO; 2005. p. 229–64.Google Scholar
  38. Stone RW. Lending credibility: the International Monetary Fund and the post-communist transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  39. Tyuryukanova E. Forced labor in the Russian Federation today: irregular migration and trafficking in human beings. Geneva: ILO; 2005.Google Scholar
  40. Visser J. Patterns and variations in European industrial relations. Report prepared for the European Commission; 2004.Google Scholar
  41. Wolfson C, Beck M. The right to strike, labor market liberalization, and the new labor code in pre-accession Lithuania. Review of Central and East European Law. 2002–2003; 79(1).Google Scholar
  42. World Bank. Doing business in 2005: removing obstacles to growth. Washington: World Bank; 2005.Google Scholar
  43. World Bank. Doing business in 2006: creating jobs: Europe and Central Asia regional profile. Washington: World Bank; 2006.Google Scholar
  44. World Bank. Doing business, 2007: how to reform. Washington: World Bank; 2007.Google Scholar
  45. World Bank. Doing business, 2008. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2008.Google Scholar
  46. World Bank. Doing business, 2009. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2009.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU). Annual survey of violations of trade union rights, various countries; available at:; 2006.
  2. International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC). Annual survey of violations of trade union rights, various countries; available at: survey07.ituc-csi/survey.php?ID_Continent=4&Lang=Eng; 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations