The Legacy of Violence on Post-Civil War Elections: The Case of El Salvador

Article

Abstract

Over the last several decades, numerous civil wars have ended as a consequence of negotiated settlements. Following many of these settlements, rebel groups have made the transition to political party and competed in democratic elections. In this paper, I assess the legacy of civil war on the performance of rebel groups as political parties. I argue that the ability of rebels to capture and control territory and their use of violence against the civilian population are two key factors explaining the performance of rebels as political parties. I test these hypotheses against the case of the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) in El Salvador using one-way ANOVA and multivariate regression analyses. In analyzing the FMLN’s performance in the 1994 “elections of the century,” I find that, as a political party, the FMLN benefited both from the state’s violently disproportionate response and its ability to hold territory during the war.

Keywords

El Salvador Guerrillas Civil war Elections 

References

  1. Allison ME. The transition from armed opposition to electoral opposition in Central America. Lat Am Pol Soc. 2006;48:137–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez FA. Transition before the transition: the case of El Salvador. Lat Am Persp. 1988;15:78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baloyra-Herp EA. Elections, civil war, and transition in El Salvador, 1982–1994: A preliminary evaluation. In: Seligson MA, Booth JA, editors. Elections and democracy in Central America revisited. NC: University of North Carolina Press; 1995. p. 45–65.Google Scholar
  4. Bosch BJ. The Salvadoran Officer Corps and the Final Offensive of 1981. NC: McFarland; 1999.Google Scholar
  5. Bracamonte JAM, Spencer DE. Strategy and tactics of Salvadoran FMLN Guerrillas: last battle of the cold war, blueprint for future conflicts. CT: Praeger; 1995.Google Scholar
  6. Deonandan K, Close D, Prevost G (Eds) From revolutionary movements to political parties. NY: Palgrave MacMillan; 2007.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Social Science Universidad de El Salvador. An analysis of the correlation of forces in El Salvador. Lat Am Persp. 1987;14:426–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Zeeuw, J, (ed) From soldiers to politicians: Transforming rebel movements after civil war. CO: Rienner; 2007.Google Scholar
  9. Fearon JD, Laitin DD. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. Am Pol Sci Rev. 2003;97:75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammond JL. Fighting to learn: popular education and Guerrilla war in El Salvador. NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  11. Hauss C, Rayside D. The development of new parties in western democracies since 1945. In: Maisel L, Cooper J, editors. Political parties: development and decay. CA: Sage Publications; 1978. p. 31–57.Google Scholar
  12. Herman ES, Brodhead F. Demonstration elections: US-staged elections in the Dominican Republic, Vietnam, and El Salvador. MA: South End; 1984.Google Scholar
  13. Kalyvas SN. Wanton and senseless? The logic of massacres in Algeria. Rationality and Society. 1999;11:243–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalyvas SN. ‘New’ and ‘old’ civil wars: a valid distinction? World Politics. 2001;54:99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar K. Postconflict elections, democratization & international assistance. CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc; 1998.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis P. Political parties in post-communist eastern Europe. NY: Routledge; 2000.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis-Beck M, Stegmaeir M. Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. An Rev Pol Sci. 2000;3:183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Licklider R. The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars, 1945–1993. Am Pol Sci Rev. 1995;89:681–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luciak IA. After the revolution: gender and democracy in El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Guatemala. MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Manning C. Armed opposition groups into political parties: comparing Bosnia, Kosovo, and Mozambique. Stud Comp In Dev. 2004;39:54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McClintock C. Revolutionary movements in Latin America: El Salvador’s FMLN and Peru’s shining path. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  22. Pearce J. Promised land: peasant rebellion in Chalatenango, El Salvador. London: Latin American Bureau; 1984.Google Scholar
  23. Seligson MA, McElhinny V. Low-intensity warfare, high-intensity death: the demographic impact of the wars in El Salvador and Nicaragua. Can J Lat Am Can Stud. 1996;21:211–41.Google Scholar
  24. Shugart MS. Guerrillas and elections: an institutionalist perspective on the costs of conflict and cooperation. Int Stud Quart. 1992;36:121–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spence J, Vickers G. Toward a level playing field? A report on the post-war Salvadoran electoral process. MA: Hemisphere Initiatives; 1994.Google Scholar
  26. Stahler-Stolk R. El Salvador’s negotiated transition, from low intensity conflict to low intensity democracy. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs. 1995;19:1–53.Google Scholar
  27. Tucker JA. The first decade of post-communist elections and voting: what have we studied, and how have we studied it? Ann Rev Pol Sci. 2002;5:271–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vickers G, Spence J. Elections: the right consolidates power. NACLA Rep Amer. 1994;18:1–15.Google Scholar
  29. Wantchekon L. Strategic voting in conditions of political instability: the 1994 elections in El Salvador. Comp Pol Stud. 1999;32:810–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wickham-Crowley TP. Winners, losers, and also-rans: Toward a comparative sociology of Latin American Guerrilla movements. In: Eckstein S, editor. Power and popular protest. CA: UC Press; 1990. p. 132–81.Google Scholar
  31. Wickham-Crowley TP. Guerrillas and revolution in Latin America: a comparative study of rebels and regimes since 1956. NJ: Princeton Univ. Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  32. Wood EJ. Forging democracy from below: rebel transitions in South Africa and El Salvador. NY: Cambridge University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  33. Wood EJ. Rebel collective action and civil war in El Salvador. NY: Cambridge University Press; 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of ScrantonScrantonUSA

Personalised recommendations