Autocracy, Elections, and Fiscal Policy: Evidence from Malaysia

Article

Abstract

Authoritarian regimes often use fiscal policy to reward political supporters and to punish political opponents. In many authoritarian regimes with political institutions like parties, legislatures, and elections, elections become a focal point for budget expenditures and the distribution of government patronage. A time-series analysis of Malaysian fiscal expenditures from 1967 to 1997 shows that the ruling coalition systematically increases federal government spending before elections. In addition to marshalling private resources to distribute patronage, the Malaysian government manipulates the government’s official position. These findings have important implications for the growing literature on political institutions under autocratic regimes and the politics of patronage and redistribution in the developing world. They also suggest a new empirical domain for existing theories of political business cycles.

Keywords

Autocracy Elections Fiscal policy Malaysia 

References

  1. Alesina A, Roubini N. Political cycles in OECD economies. Rev Econ Stud 1992;4:663–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina A, Schultze CL. Alternative approaches to political business cycles: comments and discussion. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1989. 1989;2:1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina A, Wacziarg R. Openness, country size and government. J Public Econ 1998;3:305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alt JE, Chrystal, KA. Public sector behaviour: the status of the political business cycle. In: Currie D, Nobay R, Peel D, editors. Macroeconomic analysis: essays in macroeconomics and econometrics. London: Croom Helm Ltd; 1981. pp. 353–76.Google Scholar
  5. Alvarez M, Cheibub JA, Limongi F, Przeworski A. DATA SET 1950–1990. Democracy and development: institutions and material well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Available online at <http://pantheon.yale.edu/~jac236/Research.htm>; 1999.
  6. Bass JR. Malaysia: continuity or change? Asian Surv 1970;2:152–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beck N. Elections and the fed: is there a political monetary cycle? Am J Polit Sci 1987;1:194–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett WL. Introduction: communication and civic engagement in the comparative perspective. Polit Commun 2000;4:307–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blaydes L. Electoral budget cycles under authoritarianism: economic opportunism in Mubarak’s Egypt. Paper presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association; 2006.Google Scholar
  10. Bollerslev T. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econom 1986;3:307–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bollerslev T, Wooldridge JM. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time varying covariances. Econom Rev 1992;11:143–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowie A. Crossing the industrial divide: state, society, and the politics of economic transformation in Malaysia. New York: Columbia University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  13. Brownlee JM. ...And yet they persist: explaining survival and transition in neopatrimonial regimes. Stud Comp Int Dev 2002a;37 3:35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brownlee JM. Low tide after the third wave: exploring politics under authoritarianism. Comp Polit 2002b;34 2:477–98.Google Scholar
  15. Cameron DR. The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis. Am Polit Sci Rev 1978;72 4:1243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Case W. Malaysia’s resilient pseudodemocracy. J Democr 2001;12 1:43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Case W. Politics in Southeast Asia: democracy or less. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  18. Chatfield C. The analysis of time series: an introduction. 5th ed. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1996.Google Scholar
  19. Chen J, Zhong Y, Hillard JW. The level and sources of popular support for China’s current political regime. Communist Post-Communist Stud 1997;30 1:45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chin J. The 1995 Malaysian general election: Mahathir’s last triumph? Asian Surv 1996;36 4:393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark WR, Reichert UN, Lomas SL, Parker KL. International and domestic constraints on political business cycles in OECD economies. Int Organ 1998;52 1:87–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crouch H. Malaysia: neither authoritarian nor democratic. In: Hewison K, Robison R, Rodan G, editors. Southeast Asia in the 1990s: authoritarianism, democracy, and capitalism. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin; 1993. pp. 133–58.Google Scholar
  23. Crouch H. Industrialization and political change. In: Brookfield H, editor. Transforming with industrialization in Peninsular Malaysia. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994. pp. 14–34.Google Scholar
  24. Crouch H. Malaysia: do elections make a difference? In: Taylor RH, editor. The politics of elections in Southeast Asia. New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press; 1996. pp. 114–35.Google Scholar
  25. Cukierman A, Meltzer AH. A theory of ambiguity, credibility, and inflation under discretion and asymmetric information. Econometrica 1986;54 5:1099–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Drazen A. Political economy in macroeconomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  27. Engle R. GARCH 101: the use of ARCH/GARCH models in applied econometrics. J Econ Perspect 2001:15 4:157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Faaland J, Parkinson J, Saniman R. Growth and ethnic inequality: Malaysia’s new economic policy. 2nd ed. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd; 2003.Google Scholar
  29. Frey BS, Schneider F. An empirical study of politico–economic interaction in the United States. Rev Econ Stat 1978;60 2:174–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gale B. Politics and public enterprise in Malaysia. Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia: Eastern Universities Press Sdn. Bhd; 1981.Google Scholar
  31. Gandhi J, Przeworski A. Dictatorial institutions and the survival of dictators. Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association; 2001.Google Scholar
  32. Gandhi J, Przeworski A. Cooperation, cooptation, and rebellion under dictatorships. Econ Polit 2006;18 1:1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Geddes B, Zaller J. Sources of popular support for authoritarian regimes. Am J Polit Sci 1989;33 2:319–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Golden DG, Poterba JM. The price of popularity: the political business cycle reexamined. Am J Polit Sci 1980;24 4:696–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gomez ET. Political business: corporate involvement of Malaysian political parties. Townsville, Queensland, Australia: Centre for South-East Asian Studies, James Cook University of North Queensland; 1994.Google Scholar
  36. Gomez ET. Political business in Malaysia: party factionalism, corporate development, and economic crisis. In: Gomez ET, editor. Political business in East Asia. London: Routledge; 2002. pp. 82–114.Google Scholar
  37. Gomez ET, Jomo KS. Malaysia’s political economy: politics, patronage and profits. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  38. Gonzalez MA. Do changes in democracy affect the political budget cycle? Evidence from Mexico. Rev Devel Econ 2002;6 2:204–24.Google Scholar
  39. Grier KB. On the existence of the political monetary cycle. Am J Polit Sci 1989;33 2:376–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grier RM, Grier KB. Political cycles in nontraditional settings: theory and evidence from the case of Mexico. J Law Econ 2000;43 1:239–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hermet G. State-controlled elections: a framework. In: Hermet G, Rose R, Rouquié A, editors. Elections without choice. London: The Macmillan Press, Ltd; 1978. pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  42. Hermet G, Rose R, Rouquié A, editors. Elections without choice. London: The Macmillan Press, Ltd; 1978.Google Scholar
  43. Hibbs D. Political parties and macroeconomic policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 1977;71 4:1467–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hilley J. Malaysia: mahathirism, hegemony and the new opposition. London: Zed Books; 2001.Google Scholar
  45. Jesudason JV. Statist democracy and the limits of civil society in Malaysia. Singapore: Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore; 1993.Google Scholar
  46. Jomo KS. Privatisation. In: Jomo KS, editor. Malaysia’s economy in the nineties. Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications (M) Sdn. Bhd; 1994. pp. 259–84.Google Scholar
  47. Jomo KS. Elections’ Janus face: limitations and potential in Malaysia. In: Taylor RH, editor. The politics of elections in Southeast Asia. New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press; 1996. pp. 90–113.Google Scholar
  48. Jomo KS, editor. Malaysian eclipse: economic crisis and recovery. London: Zed Books Ltd; 2001.Google Scholar
  49. Kayser MA. Who surfs, who manipulates? The determinants of opportunistic election timing and electorally motivated economic intervention. Am Polit Sci Rev 2005;99 1:17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Keller RR, May AM. The presidential political business cycle of 1972. J Econ Hist 1984;44 2:265–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Khoo BT. Between law and politics: the Malaysian judiciary since independence. In: Jayasuriya K, editor. Law, capitalism and power in Asia: the rule of law and legal institutions. London: Routledge; 1999. pp. 205–32.Google Scholar
  52. Lawson S. Conceptual issues in the comparative study of regime change and democratization. Comp Polit 1993;25 2:183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Levitsky S, Way LA. The rise of competitive authoritarianism. J Democr 2002;13 2:51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lim KS. The electoral roll: the more you clean it, the dirtier it becomes? Aliran Mon 1995;2:2–34, 40.Google Scholar
  55. Lim HH. The delineation of peninsular electoral constituencies: amplifying Malay and UMNO power. In: Wah FLK, Saravanamuttu J, editor. New politics in Malaysia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies; 2003. pp. 25–52.Google Scholar
  56. Linz JJ. Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2000.Google Scholar
  57. Liow J. Crisis, choice and change: Malaysian electoral politics at the end of the 20th century. Asian J Polit Sci 1999;7 2:5–74.Google Scholar
  58. Loh KW. The Sabah state elections 1999. Aliran Mon 1999;19 3:3–40.Google Scholar
  59. Means GP. Malaysian politics: the second generation. Singapore: Oxford University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  60. Means GP. Soft authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore. J Democr 1996;7:103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mills TC. Time series techniques for economists. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  62. Munro-Kua A. Authoritarian populism in Malaysia. New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc; 1996.Google Scholar
  63. Muzaffar C. Freedom in fetters: an analysis of the state of democracy in Malaysia. Penang: Aliran; 1986.Google Scholar
  64. Netto A. Phantom voters deny PAS victory. Aliran Mon 1992;12 4:7–40.Google Scholar
  65. Nordhaus WD. The political business cycle. Rev Econ Stud 1975;2:69–190.Google Scholar
  66. Nordhaus WD. Alternative approaches to the political business cycle. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1989;1989 2:1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Parmer JN. Malaysia: changing a little to keep pace. Asian Surv 1967;7 2:131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Puthucheary ML, Norani O, editors. Elections and democracy in Malaysia. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; 2005.Google Scholar
  69. Radelet S, Sachs JD. The East Asian financial crisis: diagnosis, remedies, prospects. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1998. 1998;1:1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rodrik D. Why do more open economies have bigger governments? J Polit Econ 1998;5:997–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rogoff K. Equilibrium political budget cycles. Am Econ Rev 1990;1:21–36.Google Scholar
  72. Rogoff K, Sibert A. Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. Rev Econ Stud 1988;1:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schedler A. The menu of manipulation. J Democr 2002;13 2:36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schedler A, editor. Electoral authoritarianism: the dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner; 2006.Google Scholar
  75. Schultz K. The politics of the political business cycle. Br J Polit Sci 1995;25 1:79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Scott JC. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1985.Google Scholar
  77. Searle P. The riddle of Malaysian capitalism: rent-seekers or real capitalists? Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  78. Slater D. Iron cage in an iron fist: authoritarian institutions and the personalization of power in Malaysia. Comp Polit 2003;36 1:81–101.Google Scholar
  79. Smith A. Endogenous election timing in majoritarian parliamentary systems. Econ Polit 1996;8 2:85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith A. Election timing in majoritarian parliaments. Br J Polit Sci 2003;33 3:397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith BB. Life of the party: the origins of regime breakdown and persistence under single-party rule. World Polit 2005;57 3:421–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stearn D. Chronology of South-East Asian history, 1400–1996. Dee Why, Australia: Mitraphab Centre; 1997.Google Scholar
  83. Tourres M-A. The tragedy that didn’t happen: Malaysia’s crisis management and capital controls. Kuala Lumpur: ISIS Malaysia; 2003.Google Scholar
  84. Tufte ER. Political control of the economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1978.Google Scholar
  85. Venter D. Democracy and multiparty politics in Africa: recent elections in Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Lesotho. East Afr Soc Sci Res Rev 2003;1 1:1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zaharom N. The structure of the media industry: implications for democracy. In: Wah FLK, Khoo BT, editors. Democracy in Malaysia: discourses and practices. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press; 2002. pp. 111–137.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science & Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Colorado-BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations