Advertisement

Society

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 607–610 | Cite as

The Value of Pluralism in the Academy

  • Keith E. WhittingtonEmail author
Symposium: Self-Censorship and Life in the Liberal Academy
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Sustaining a climate that encourages free speech and free inquiry is a persistent challenge in the university setting, just as it is in society more broadly. Appropriate institutional protections and policies can help protect against the censorious suppression of unorthodox views, but the problem of self-censorship by faculty and students alike might be a harder problem to solve. Creating safeguards so that dissenters from local orthodoxies do not fear reprisals is only a first step toward reducing the temptation to self-censorship. Constructing a pluralistic intellectual environment and nurturing a culture of critical dialogue and skeptical inquiry will help draw out a more robust exchange of ideas.

Keywords

Higher education Professors Diversity Academic freedom Pluralism Free inquiry Free speech 

Notes

Further Reading

  1. Chamlee-Wright, E. 2019. Self-Censorship and Associational Life in the Liberal Academy. Society, 56(6).Google Scholar
  2. Gallup 2016. Free Expression on Campus: A Survey of U.S. College Students and U.S. Adults. Washington, D.C.:Gallup.Google Scholar
  3. Gibson, J. L. 2008. Intolerance and Political Repression in the United States: A Half Century after McCarthyism. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gibson, J. L., & Bingham, R. D. 1982. On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Political Tolerance. The American Political Science Review, 76(3), 603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gross, N. 2013. Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? Cambridge:Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Knight Foundation 2019. Free Expression on College Campuses. Miami:Knight Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. McCloskey, H., & Brill, A. 1983. The Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Believe about Civil Liberties. New York:Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Naughton, K. A., Eastman, N., & Perrino, N. 2017. Speaking Freely: What Students Think About Expression at American Colleges. Philadelphia:Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.Google Scholar
  9. Peffley, M., & Rohrschneider, R. 2003. Democratization and Political Tolerance in Seventeen Countries: A Multi-level Model of Political Learning. Political Research Quarterly, 56(3), 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rothman, S., Kelly-Woessner, A., & Woessner, M. 2011. The Still Divided Academy: How Competing Visions of Power, Politics, Diversity Complicate the Mission of Higher Education. Lanham:Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. Shields, J. A., & Dunn, J. M. 2016. Passing on the Right: Conservative Professors in the Progressive University. New York:Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stouffer, S. A. 1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties: A Cross Section of the Nation Speaks Its Mind. Garden City:Doubleday.Google Scholar
  13. Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J. E., & Marcus, G. E. 1982. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Whittington, K. E. 2018. Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech. Princeton:Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PoliticsPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations