Advertisement

Society

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 340–347 | Cite as

The Degradation of Merit

  • Joseph C. HermanowiczEmail author
Symposium: Varsity Blues
  • 31 Downloads

There will be controversy and dissent in the allocation of rewards when rewards are scarce and the criteria for distributing them are unclear. This is a problem of “distributive justice.” More people believe they are eligible for the reward than there are rewards to go around. There are, at face, two solutions: make the rewards more numerous or make the criteria clearer. The problem with the first solution is that there is a point when the rewards are made so numerous as to no longer constitute a reward. The problem with the second solution is that all definitions involve boundaries, and in drawing boundaries some subset will believe they have been unreasonably excluded. There are other, less straightforward, solutions. They extend from the first solution above by effectively reducing demand for the said reward. One is to make the substance of the reward clearer, and by doing so, enlighten those who seek it that in fact they would be better matched for some other reward. Another is to...

Keywords

College admissions Merit Selectivity Massification Grade inflation Elite Corruption Universities 

Notes

References

  1. Abbott, A. n.d. Sociology Job Market Rumors blog. https://www.socjobrumors.com/topic/andrew-abbotts-ama. Downloaded May 23, 2019.
  2. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. 2011. Academically adrift: Limited learning on college Campuses. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cantwell, B. 2018. Broad access and steep stratification in the First Mass System: High Participation Higher Education in the United States of America. In B. Cantwell, S. Marginson, & A. Smolentseva (Eds.), High Participation Systems of Higher Education (pp. 227–265). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delbanco, A. 2012. College: What it was, is, and should be. Princeton:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. 2007. Rankings and reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. 1998. Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. 2008. A Sociology of Quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49, 401–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gershenson, Seth. 2018. Grade inflation in high schools, 2005–2016. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Giroux, H. A. 2002. Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher Education: The University as a Democratic Sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 425–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldman, L. 1985. The betrayal of the gatekeepers. Journal of General Education, 37, 97–121.Google Scholar
  11. Grigsby, M. 2009. College life through the eyes of students. Alban:State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  12. Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hermanowicz, J. C. 2016. Universities, academic careers, and the valorization of ‘Shiny Things’. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 46, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hermanowicz, E. T., & Hermanowicz, J. C. Forthcoming. The Perversion of Virtue: Causes and Consequences of Contemporary Change in Academic Freedom. In J. C. Hermanowicz (Ed.), Finding Our Minds: Academic Freedom and the American University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hess, Frederick M. 2019. A modest proposal regarding college admissions. Society (this issue).Google Scholar
  16. Hu, Shouping. 2005. Beyond grade inflation: Grading problems in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 30. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Hunt, L. H. (Ed.) 2008. Grade inflation: Academic standards in higher education. Albany:State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, V. E. 2003. Grade inflation: A crisis in college education. New York:Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Kett, J. F. 2013. Merit: The History of a Founding Ideal from the American Revolution to the 21 st Century. Ithaca:Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kuh, G. 2003. What are we learning about student engagement. Change, 35, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marginson, S. 2018. High Participation Systems of Higher Education. In B. Cantwell, S. Marginson, & A. Smolentseva (Eds.), High participation Systems of Higher Education (pp. 3–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McDonough, P. M. 1997. Choosing colleges: How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity. Albany:SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, self, and society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Edited and with an Introduction by Charles W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Merton, Robert K. 1968. Social structure and anomie. In Social Theory and Social Structure, 185–214. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Milton, O., Pollio, H. R., & Eison, J. A. 1986. Making sense of college grades. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Neem, J. N. 2019. What’s the point of college? Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Newfield, Christopher. March 25, 2019. “Bleeding meritocracy: Responding to the admissions Scandal as Outrage Fades.” The blog of Academe magazine.Google Scholar
  28. Rojstaczer, Stuart. 2016. “GradeInflation.com: Grade Inflation at American Colleges and Universities.” GradeInflation.com, Downloaded: March 3, 2016.
  29. Rojstaczer, S. & Healy, C. 2010. Grading in American Colleges and Universities. Teachers College Record. http://gradeinflation.com.tcr2010grading.pdf
  30. Rojstaczer, S., & Healy, C. 2012. Where a is ordinary: The Evolution of American College and University Grading, 1940–2009. Teachers College Record, 114, 1–23.Google Scholar
  31. Rosovsky, H., & Hartley, M. 2002. Evaluation and the academy: Are We Doing the Right Thing?: Grade Inflation and Letters of Recommendation. Cambridge:American Academy of Arts & Sciences.Google Scholar
  32. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial State. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. 2001. Expanding and Elaborating the Concept of Academic Capitalism. Organization, 8, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, Christian. February 9, 2018. Higher education is drowning in BS: And It’s mortally Corrosive to Society. Chronicle of Higher Education, Section B, B6-B7.Google Scholar
  36. Trow, Martin. [1974] 2010. Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. In Michael Burrage (ed.), Martin Trow: Twentieth-Century Higher Education—Elite to Mass to Universal, 88–142. BThe betrayal of the gatekeepersaltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Trow, Martin. [1976] 2010. “Elite higher education: An endangered species?” In Michael Burrage (ed.), Martin Trow: Twentieth-Century Higher Education—Elite to Mass to Universal, 145–172. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wright, Brandon L. February 13, 2019. Rampant Grade Inflation in Harming Vulnerable High Schoolers. National Association of Gifted Children (Blog).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations