The Review of Black Political Economy

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 337–354 | Cite as

Understanding Land Grabs in Africa: Insights from Marxist and Georgist Political Economics

Article

Abstract

Research on current land grabs in Africa has proliferated. Yet, little work has been done explicitly reflecting on competing frameworks for analysing the phenomenon. This paper engages two contrasting approaches, namely Marxian and Georgist, assesses their relevance, and teases out insights for recent land grab research in Africa. It warns against any attempts at combining the ‘best’ elements in each approach, but demonstrates how these different perspectives can help re-theorise ongoing research on land grabs, especially in Africa.

Keywords

Land grabs Agrarian political economy Capitalism Development Africa 

References

  1. Agozino B. The Africana paradigm in capital: the debts of Karl Marx to people of African descent. Rev Afr Polit Econ. 2014;41(140):172–84.Google Scholar
  2. Akram-Lodhi AH, Kay C. Surveying the agrarian question (part 1): unearthing foundations, exploring diversity. J Peasant Stud. 2010a;37(1):177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akram-Lodhi AH, Kay C. Surveying the agrarian question (part 2): current debates and beyond. J Peasant Stud. 2010b;37(2):255–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alden Wily L. The law is to blame: the vulnerable status of common property rights in sub-Saharan Africa. Dev Chang. 2011;42(3):733–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alden Wily L. Looking back to see forward: the legal niceties of land theft in land rushes. J Peasant Stud. 2012;39(3–4):751–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alden Wily L. Land reform in Africa: a reappraisal, Rights to resources in crisis: reviewing the fate of customary tenure in Africa, Brief 3 of 5, Rights and Resources International, 2012.Google Scholar
  7. Alden Wily L. nothing new under the sun or a new battle joined? The political economy of African dispossession in the current global land rush. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, IDS, Sussex, 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Allan T, Keulertz M, Sojamo S, Jeroen W, editors. Handbook of land and water grabs in Africa. London: Routledge; 2013.Google Scholar
  9. Andelson RV. Henry George and the Reconstruction of Capitalism. Address to the AIER fellows, staff, and guests, Great Barrington, 9 July. Available at http://schalkenbach.org/rsf-1/on-line-library/works-by-robert-v-andelson/henry-george-and-the-reconstruction-of-capitalism/ (1992). Accessed 10 Aug 2013.
  10. Arce A, Marsden TK. The social construction of international food: a new research agenda. Economic Geography, vol. 69, no. 3, Environment and Development, Part 1. 1993: 293–311.Google Scholar
  11. Austin G. Labour, land and capital in Ghana: from slavery to free labour in Asante, 1807–1956. New York: University of Rochester Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Barnes T. Review of Marx at the margins: on the nationalism, Ethnicity and Non-Western Societies. J Aust Polit Econ, no. 68, summer. 2011; 245–248.Google Scholar
  13. Bernstein H. Changing before our very eyes: agrarian questions and the politics of land in capitalism today. J Agrar Chang. 2004;4(1 and 2):190–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernstein H. Rural land and conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Moyo S, Yeros P, editors. Reclaiming the land: the resurgence of rural movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: Zed Books; 2005. p. 67–101.Google Scholar
  15. Bernstein H. Class dynamics of agrarian change. Initiatives in critical agrarian studies. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing; 2010.Google Scholar
  16. Boamah F. How and why chiefs formalise land use in recent times: the politics of land dispossession through biofuels investments in Ghana. Rev Afr Polit Econ. 2014;41(141):406–23.Google Scholar
  17. Borras Jr SM, Franco JC. Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: a preliminary analysis. J Agrar Chang. 2012;12(1):34–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Borras Jr SM, Kay C, Gómez S, Wilkinson J. Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: key features in Latin America. Canad J Dev Stud/Rev Can d’études Dév. 2012;33(4):402–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bougrine H. Oil: profits of the chain keepers. Intl J Polit Econ. 2006;35(2):35–53.Google Scholar
  20. Brockington D, Duffy R, Iggoe J. Nature unbound: conservation, capitalism, and the future of protected. London: Earthscan; 2008.Google Scholar
  21. Bryson PJ. The economics of Henry George: history’s rehabilitation of America’s greatest early economist. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Byres TJ. Political economy, the agrarian question and the comparative method. J Peasant Stud. 1995;22(4):561–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Byres TJ. Structural change, the agrarian question, and the possible impact of globalisation. In: Chandrasekhar CP, Ghosh J, editors. And yet the centre holds. Essays on globalisation, structural change and income distribution. Delhi: Tulika; 2003. p. 171–211.Google Scholar
  24. Chouquer G. The global issue of land grabbing: interviews with charlotte Castan. Paris: Publi Topex, Presse Edition; 2012.Google Scholar
  25. Cleveland MM. The economics of Henry George: a review essay. Am J Econ Sociol. 2012;71(2):498–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Collier P. The politics of hunger: how illusion and greed fan the food crisis. Foreign Aff. 2009;87(6):67.Google Scholar
  27. Cooper F. Africa in the World: capitalism, empire, nation-state, Harvard University Press: Cambridge; 2014.Google Scholar
  28. Cotula L, Pollack E. The global land rush: what the evidence reveals about scale and geography. IIED Briefing Paper, 2012.Google Scholar
  29. Cotula L, Vermeulen S, Leonard R, Keeley J. Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. London: International Institute for Environment and Development; 2009.Google Scholar
  30. Cui Z. Partial intimations of the coming whole : the Chongqing experiment in light of the theories of Henry George, James Meade, and Antonio Gramsci. Mod China. 2011;37(6):646–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. De Mille AG. Afterword: who was Henry George? In: George H, editor. Progress and poverty. New York: Robert Schalkenbach Foundation; 2006. p. 304–10.Google Scholar
  32. De Soto H. The mystery of capital, why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York: Bantam Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  33. Deininger K, Ayalew D, Alemu T. Impact of land certification on tenure security, land investment and market participation: evidence from Ethiopia. Land Econ. 2011;87(2):312–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dunn B. Accumulation by dispossession or accumulation of capital? The case of China. J Austr Polit Econ. 2007;60:6–27.Google Scholar
  35. Elhadary YAE, Obeng-Odoom F. ‘Conventions, changes and contradictions in land governance in Africa: the story of land grabbing in Sudan and Ghana’, Africa Today; 2012:59(2):59–78.Google Scholar
  36. Evers SJTM, Campbell G, Lambek M. Land competition and human-environment relations in Madagascar. In: Evers SJTM, Campbell G, Lambek M, editors. Contest for land in Madagascar: environment, ancestors and development. Leiden: Brill; 2013. p. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fainstein S. Land value capture and justice. In: Ingram GK, Hong Y-H, editors. Value capture and land policies. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 2012. p. 21–40.Google Scholar
  38. Fairhead J, Leach M, Scoones I. Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? J Peasant Stud. 2012;39(2):237–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gaffney M. Neo-classical economics as a Stratagem against Henry George. In: Harrison F, editor. The corruption of economics. London: Shepheard-Walwyn Publishing Co.; 1994. p. 29–164.Google Scholar
  40. Gaffney M. After the crash: designing a depression-free economy. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.Google Scholar
  41. Garland E. The elephant in the room: confronting the colonial character of wildlife conservation in Africa. Afr Stud Rev. 2008;51(3):51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. George H. Progress and poverty. New York: Robert Schalkenbach Foundation; [1879] 2006.Google Scholar
  43. Georgist Journal. Wall Street J. no. 122, Spring, 2013; 12–14.Google Scholar
  44. Glassman J. Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession, accumulation by ‘extra-economic’ means. Prog Hum Geogr. 2006;30(5):608–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harvey D. The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  46. Hudson G. Henry George’s political critics. Am J Econ Sociol. 2008;67(1):1–45.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kea PJ. Land, labour and entrustment. Leiden: Brill; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kelly AB. Conservation practice as primitive accumulation. J Peasant Stud. 2011;38(4):683–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lawson T. What is this ‘school’ called neoclassical economics? Camb J Econ. 2013;37:947–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lewonth R, Levins R. Biology under the influence: dialectical essays on ecology, agriculture, and health. New York: Monthly Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  51. Li TM. Centering labor in the land grab debate. J Peasant Stud. 2011;38(2):281–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liodakis G. Agrarian question. In: O’Hara P, editor. Encyclopedia of political economy, vol. 1. London and New York: Routledge; 2001. p. 8–10.Google Scholar
  53. Makki F. Power and property: commercialization, enclosures, and the transformation of agrarian relations in Ethiopia. J Peasant Stud. 2012;39(1):81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moyo S, Yeros P, eds. Reclaiming the land: the resurgence of rural movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London and New York: Zed Books; 2005.Google Scholar
  55. Munro D. Land and Capital. J Aust Polit Econ, no. 70, summer, 2013, 214–232.Google Scholar
  56. Norberg J. In defence of global capitalism. St. Leonards: The Center for Independent Studies; 2005.Google Scholar
  57. Nwoke CN. World mining rent: an extension of Marx’s theories. Review. 1984;8(1):29–89.Google Scholar
  58. O’Sullivan A. Urban economics. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin; 2012.Google Scholar
  59. Obeng-Odoom F. Oiling the urban economy: land, labour, capital, and the state in Sekondi-Takoradi. London: Routledge; 2014a.Google Scholar
  60. Obeng-Odoom F. Urban land policies in Ghana: a case of the emperor’s new clothes? Rev Black Polit Econ. 2014b;41(2):119–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pearce F. The land grabbers: the new fight over who owns the earth. Boston: Beacon; 2012.Google Scholar
  62. Peluso NL, Lund C. New frontiers of land control: introduction. J Peasant Stud. 2011;38(4):667–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pullen J. Henry George on property rights in land and land value: equal and private, or common and public? In: Aspromourgos T, Lodewijks J, editors. History and political: essays in honour of P.D. Groenewegen. London: Routledge; 2012. p. 118–38.Google Scholar
  64. Scoones I, Hall R, Borras Jr SM, White B, Wolford W. The politics of evidence: methodologies for understanding the global land rush. J Peasant Stud. 2013;40(3):469–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stilwell F. The condition of labour, capital and land. Paper presented at the Conference of the Association for Good Government, Sydney; 2011.Google Scholar
  66. Stilwell F, Jordan K. The political economy of land: putting Henry George in his place. J Aust Polit Econ. 2004;54:119–34.Google Scholar
  67. Vinciguerra V. How the Daewoo attempted land acquisition contributed to Madagascar’s political crisis in 2009. In: Evers SJTM, Campbell G, Lambek M, editors. Contest for land in Madagascar: environment, ancestors and development. Leiden: Brill; 2013. p. 221–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. White B, Borras SM, Hall R, Scoones I, Wolford W. The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals. J Peasant Stud. 2012;39(3–4):619–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Widerquist KP, Howard MW, editors. Alaska’s permanent fund dividend: examining its suitability as a model. New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 2012.Google Scholar
  70. World Bank. Rising global interest in farmland. Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits?. Washington, D.C.; 2010.Google Scholar
  71. Wright E. Envisioning real utopias. London: Verso; 2010.Google Scholar
  72. Wyatt MD. A critical view of land value taxation as a progressive strategy for urban revitalization, rational land use, and tax relief. Rev Radic Polit Econ. 1994;26(1):1–25.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yaro JA, Tsikata D. Savannah fires and local resistance to transnational land deals: the case of Dipale in Northern Ghana. Afr Geogr Rev. 2013;32(1):72–87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Built EnvironmentUniversity of Technology, SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.United Nations Research Institute for Social DevelopmentGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations