The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 81–93

Austrian Business Cycle Theory in Light of Rational Expectations: The Role of Heterogeneity, the Monetary Footprint, and Adverse Selection in Monetary Expansion

Article

Abstract

We contribute to the debate over the contemporary relevance of the Austrian Business Cycle theory (ABC) by making three theoretical developments. First, we claim that the heterogeneous nature of entrepreneurship is the best means to respond to a Rational Expectations (RE) critique. If entrepreneurs are different then the “cluster of errors” are not made by everyone, just those on the margin. And if the marginal entrepreneurs are systematically different from the population as a whole, we avoid the implication of widespread irrationality, even though credit expansion will affect real variables. Second, we argue that the size of the monetary footprint is a more telling signal than the market rate of interest, and will not necessarily be revealed by measured inflation. Therefore attention to the official interest rate or Consumer Price Index is misleading, and an inappropriate way to assess applicability. And third, the main harm from loose monetary policy is not that it encourages entrepreneurs to behave more recklessly with capital, but that it encourages precisely the people who can’t afford capital at the market rate to borrow, and makes them the marginal trader. This suggests that adverse selection is a more important issue than moral hazard. We acknowledge that empirical work is required to verify these claims, and suggest how this might be undertaken.

Keywords

Austrian business cycle theory Heterogeneity Monetary footprint Adverse selection Entrepreneur 

References

  1. Barnett, William II, and Walter Block. 2005. “Professor Tullock on Austrian Business Cycle Theory.” Advances in Austrian Economics 8: 431–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. _____. 2006. “Tyler Cowen on Austrian Business Cycle Theory: A Critique.” New Perspectives on Political Economy 2(2): 26–85.Google Scholar
  3. Block, Walter. 2001. “Yes, We Have No Chaff: A Reply to Wagner’s ‘Austrian Business Cycle Theory: Saving the Wheat While Discarding the Chaff’.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 4(1): 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. [1884–89] 1959. Capital and interest. 3 Vols. South Holland, Ill.: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
  5. Caplan, Bryan. 1997. “Why I am Not an Austrian Economist.” Unpublished manuscript. Available at http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/whyaust.htm.
  6. Carilli, Anthony M., and Gregory M. Dempster. 2001. “Expectations in Austrian Business Cycle Theory: An Application of the Prisoner’s Dilemma.” Review of Austrian Economics 14(4): 319–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowen, Tyler. 1997. Risk and Business Cycles: New and Old Austrian Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. De Soto, Jesús Huerta. 2006. Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Egger, John B. 1995. “Arthur Marget in the Austrian Tradition of the Theory of Money.” Review of Austrian Economics 8(2): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferguson, Niall. 2006. “Friedman is Dead, Monetarism is Dead, But What about Inflation?” The Daily Telegraph (London) 19 November.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, Milton. 1992. Money Mischief: Episodes in Monetary History New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  12. Garrison, Roger W. 1997. “The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle.” In Business Cycles and Depressions. Ed. David Glasner. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. _____. 2001. Time and Money: The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Hayek, F.A. 1935. Prices and Production. 2nd Ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  15. _____. 1941. The Pure Theory of Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hummel, Jeffrey Rogers. 1979. “Problems with Austrian Business Cycle Theory.” Reason Papers 5: 41–53. Available at http://www.reasonpapers.com/pdf/05/rp_5_4.pdf.
  17. Lachmann, Ludwig M. [1956] 1978. Capital and Its Structure. Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
  18. Lewin, Peter. 1999. Capital in Disequilibrium: The Role of Capital in a Changing World. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Marget, Arthur W. 1937. “Inflation, Inevitable or Avoidable?” A talk presented on November 23, 1936 at the University of Minnesota. Published as No.15 in the University’s “Day and Hour Series.” University of Minnesota Press, January 1937.Google Scholar
  20. _____. 1942. The Theory of Prices: A Re-Examination of the Central problems of Monetary Theory. Vol 2. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Mises, Ludwig von. [1912] 1971. Theory of Money and Credit. Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Foundation for Economic Education.Google Scholar
  22. _____. [1966] 1998. Human Action. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Rothbard, Murray N. 1978. “Austrian Definitions of the Supply of Money.” In New Directions in Austrian Economics. Ed. Louis M. Spadaro. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
  24. Salerno, Joseph T. 1987. “The “True” Money Supply: A Measure of the Supply of Medium of Exchange in the U.S. Economy.” Austrian Economics Newsletter (Spring).Google Scholar
  25. Shleifer, Andrei, and Lawrence H. Summers. 1990. “The Noise Trader Approach to Finance.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 4: 19–33.Google Scholar
  26. Shostak, Frank. 1999. “Asian Recovery?” The Asian Wall Street Journal. June 15th.Google Scholar
  27. _____. 2000. “The Mystery of the Money Supply Definition.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3(4): 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. _____. 2003. “Making Sense of Money Supply Data.” Ludwig von Mises Institute Daily Article. 17th December.Google Scholar
  29. Thaler, Richard H. 1992. The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economics Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Thornton, Mark. Forthcoming. “The Economics of Housing Bubbles.” In America’s Housing Crisis: A Case of Government Failure. Ed. Benjamin Powell and Randall Holcombe. San Francisco: Independent Institute. Google Scholar
  31. Tullock, Gordon. 1987. “Why the Austrians are Wrong about Depressions.” Review of Austrian Economics 2: 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wagner, Ricard E. 1994. “Economic Efficiency, Rent Seeking, and Democracy: Zenoistic Variations on Coasian Themes.” In Advances in Austrian Economics. Vol. 1. Ed. Peter Boettke and Mario J. Rizzo. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar. Pp. 129–44.Google Scholar
  33. _____. 1999. “Austrian Cycle Theory: Saving the Wheat while Discarding the Chaff.” Review of Austrian Economics 12(1): 105–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wicksell, Knut. [1898] 1936. Interest and Prices. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Yeager, Leland B. 1986. “The Significance of Monetary Disequilibrium.” Cato Journal 6: 369–99.Google Scholar
  36. _____. 1997. The Fluttering Veil: Essays on Monetary Disequilibrium. Indianapolis, Ind: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ludwig von Mises Institute 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESCP-EAP European School of ManagementLondonUK
  2. 2.Seafood Holdings LtdHertfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations