The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 300–312 | Cite as

Fritz Machlup’s Methodology and The Theory of the Growth of the Firm

  • Carol M. Connell


Small Firm Large Firm Managerial Service American Economic Review Vertical Integration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boulding, Kenneth E. 1956. The Image. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Foss, Nicolai J. 1998. “Austrian Insights and the Theory of the Firm.” Advances in Austrian Economics 4:175–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Foss, Nicolai J., Peter G. Klein, Yasemin Y. Kor, and Joseph T. Mahoney. 2006. “Entrepreneurship, Subjectivism and the Resource-based View: Towards a New Synthesis.” Working Paper. Online at:
  4. Hayek, Friedrich. 1978. Competition as a Discovery Procedure. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hayek, Friedrich. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hayek, Friedrich. 1945. “Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35: 519–30.Google Scholar
  7. Kirzner, Israel M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Knight, Frank H. [1921] 1964. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. New York: Sentry Press.Google Scholar
  9. Koppl, Roger. 1992. “Invisible-Hand Explanations and Neoclassical Economics: Toward a Post Marginalist Economics.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 148: 292–313.Google Scholar
  10. Lachmann, Ludwig M. 1986. The Market as an Economic Process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Lachmann, Ludwig M. [1956] 1978. Capital and its Structure. Menlo Park, CA: Institute of Humane Studies.Google Scholar
  12. Langlois, Richard N., and Roger Koppl. 1991. “Fritz Machlup and Marginalism.” Methodus 3: 86–102.Google Scholar
  13. Loasby, Brian J. 1999. “Edith T. Penrose’s Place in the Filiation of Economic Ideas.” Oeconomia 29: 103–21.Google Scholar
  14. Loasby, Brian J. 1991. Equilibrium and Evolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Loasby, Brian J. 1976. Choice, Complexity and Ignorance. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Machlup, Fritz. 1978. Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  17. Machlup, Fritz. 1948–1955. Papers. Hoover Institution Archives. Stanford, CA. Box 57, Folder 23.Google Scholar
  18. Machlup, Fritz. 1946. “Marginal Analysis and Empirical Research.” American Economic Review 36, no. 4 (September): 519–54.Google Scholar
  19. Mahoney, John T., and Stephen C. Michael. 2005. “A Subjectivist Theory of Entrepreneurship.” Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mises, Ludwig von. [1949] 1996. Human Action. San Francisco: Fox & Wilkes.Google Scholar
  21. Mises, Ludwig von. [1936] 1981. Socialism. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  22. Nelson, Richard, and Sidney Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Penrose, Edith. [1959] 1995. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Penrose, Edith. 1955. “Limits to the Growth and Size of Firms.” American Economic Review 42 (2): 531–43.Google Scholar
  25. Penrose, Edith. 1952. “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm.” American Economic Review 42 (5): 804–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol M. Connell
    • 1
  1. 1.City University of New York—Brooklyn CollegeBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations