The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 223–233 | Cite as

Toward a Clarification of the Block-Demsetz Debate on Psychic Income and Externalities

  • Michael Brooks
Articles
  • 12 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Block, Walter. 2000. “Private-Property Rights, Erroneous Interpretations, Morality and Economics: Reply to Demsetz.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (1): 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, Walter. 1995. “Ethics, Efficiency, Coasean Property Rights, and Psychic Income: A Reply to Harold Demsetz.” Review of Austrian Economics 8 (2): 61–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Block, Walter. 1977. “Coase and Demsetz on Private Property Rights.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (2):111–15.Google Scholar
  4. Butler Michael, and Robert Garnett. 2003. Teaching the Coase Theorem: Are We Getting It Right? Atlantic Economic Journal 31 (2): 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coase, Ronald. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Demsetz, Harold. 1997. “Block’s Erroneous Interpretations.” Review of Austrian Economics 10 (2):101–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demsetz, Harold. 1979. “Ethics and Efficiency in Property Rights Systems.” In Time Uncertainty and Disequilibrium: Explorations of Austrian Themes. Mario Rizzo, ed. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath. Pp. 97–116.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Brooks
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Economics and FinanceUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations