The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 21–38 | Cite as

Hermeneutic economics: Between relativism and progressive polylogism

  • Pierre Perrin


Quarterly Journal Logical Structure AUSTRIAN Economic Contextual Nature Epistemic Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albert, Hans. 1988. “Hermeneutics and Economics: A Criticism of Hermeneutical Thinking in the Social Sciences.” Kyklos 41 (4): 573–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacharach, Michael. 1989. “The Role of “Verstehen” in Economic Theory.” Ricerche Economiche 43 (1–2): 129–50.Google Scholar
  3. Boudon, Raymond. 1995. Le juste et le vrai. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  4. —————. 1990. L’art de se persuader des idées douteuses, fragiles ou fausses. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  5. —————. 1986. L’idéologie. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  6. Bramoullé, Gérard. 1995. “Apriorisme et Faillibilisme: en défense de Rothbard contre Popper.” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes humaines 6 (1): 91–104.Google Scholar
  7. Caldwell, Bruce. ed. 1993. The Philosophy and Methodology of Economics. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, Donald. 1985. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1992. Critique de la raison historique. Paris: Editions du Cerf.Google Scholar
  10. Engels, Friedrich. 1979. Ludwig Feuerbach et la fin de la philosophie classique allemande. Paris: Editions sociales.Google Scholar
  11. Engels, Friedrich, and Karl Marx. 1976. L’idéologie allemande. Paris: Editions sociales. English version: Engels, Friedrich. 1994. The German Ideology. Published at: Scholar
  12. Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1996. Vérité et Méthode. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  13. —————. 1991. L’art de comprendre II (Herméneutique et champ de l’expérience humaine). Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
  14. Gilson, Etienne. 1997. Le thomisme. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, David. 1986. Hermeneutics versus Austrian Economics. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Hayek, Friedrich. [1952] 1979. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies in the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  17. —————. 1952. The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. London: Routledge and Paul Kegan.Google Scholar
  18. Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter. 2001. “On Rationality, Ideal Types and Economics: Alfred Schütz and the Austrian School.” Review of Austrian Economics 14 (2–3): 119–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lachmann, Ludwig. 1991. “Austrian Economics: A Hermeneutic Approach.” In Economics and Hermeneutics. Don Lavoie, ed. New York: Routledge. Pp. 134–46.Google Scholar
  20. —————. 1971. The Legacy of Max Weber. Berkeley, Calif.: Glendessary Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lavoie, Don, ed. 1991. Economics and Hermeneutics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. —————. 1986. “Euclideanism versus Hermeneutics: A Reinterpretation of Misesian Apriorism.” In Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding. Israel M. Kirzner, ed. London: Macmillan. Pp. 192–210.Google Scholar
  23. Levy-Bruhl, Louis. 1922. La mentalité primitive. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  24. Madison, G.B. 1991. “Getting Beyond Objectivism.” In Economics and Hermeneutics. Don Lavoie, ed. New York: Routledge. Pp. 34–58.Google Scholar
  25. Miller, Eugene F. 1979. “The Cognitive Basis of Hayek’s Political Thought.” In Liberty and the Rule of Law. Robert L. Cunningham, ed. College Station: Texas A&M University Press. Pp. 242–67.Google Scholar
  26. Mises, Ludwig von. [1966] 1998. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Scholar’s Edition. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  27. —————. 1985. Theory and History. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  28. Ousset, Jean. 1970. Marxisme et Révolution. Paris: Montalza.Google Scholar
  29. Popper, Karl. 1989. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. 5th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Rasmussen, Douglas. 1984. “Quine and Aristotelian Essentialism.” The New Scholasticism 58: 316–35.Google Scholar
  31. Rector, Ralph. 1991. “The Economics of Rationality and the Rationality of Economics.” In Economics and Hermeneutics. Don Lavoie, ed. New York: Routledge. Pp. 195–235.Google Scholar
  32. Rothbard, Murray. 1990. “Karl Marx: Communist as Religious Eschatologist.” Review of Austrian Economics 4: 123–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schutz, Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, Barry. 1996. “In Defense of Extreme (Faillibilistic) Apriorism.” Journal of Liberatarian Studies 12 (1): 179–92.Google Scholar
  35. —————. 1990. “On the Austrianness of Austrian Economics.” Critical Review 4 (1–2): 212–38.Google Scholar
  36. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.” Cognitive Psychology 5: 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. —————. 1972. “Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness.” Cognitive Psychology 3: 430–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Warnke, Georgia. 1993. “Translator’s Introduction.” In The Philosophy and Methodology of Economics. Bruce Caldwell, ed. London: Edward Elgar. Pp. 251–66.Google Scholar
  39. Weber, Max. 1995. Economie et société, Vol. 1. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Perrin
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculté d’Economie Appliquée, Centre d’Analyse EconomiqueUniversité Paul CézanneFrance

Personalised recommendations