Austrian economics, neoclassical economics, marketing, and finance

  • Walter Block
  • William Barnett
  • Stuart Wood
Articles
  • 39 Downloads

Keywords

Public Choice Quarterly Journal Normative Standard AUSTRIAN Economic Perfect Competition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, William, Walter Block, Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Ilana Mercer, Leon Snyman, and Christopher Westley. 2001. “The Microsoft Corporation in Collision with Antitrust Law.” Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies 26(1): 287–302.Google Scholar
  2. Armentano, Dominick T. 1972. The Myths of Antitrust. New Rochelle, N.Y.: Arlington House.Google Scholar
  3. ————— 1982. Antitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. ————— 1991. Antitrust Policy: The Case for Repeal. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. Armstrong, Donald. 1982. Competition versus Monopoly: Combined Policy in Perspective. Vancouver, B.C.: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, William, II. 1989. “Subjective Cost Revisited.” Review of Austrian Economics 3:137–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Block, Walter. 1977. “Austrian Monopoly Theory—A Critique.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 1(4): 271–79.Google Scholar
  8. —————. 1982. Amending the Combines Investigation Act. Vancouver, B.C.: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
  9. —————. [1976] 1991. Defending the Undefendable. New York: Fox and Wilkes.Google Scholar
  10. —————. 1992. “Socialist Psychology: Values and Motivations.” Cultural Dynamics 5(3): 260–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. —————. 1994. “Total Repeal of Anti-trust Legislation: A Critique of Bork, Brozen and Posner.” Review of Austrian Economics 8(1): 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —————. 1997. “Tobacco Advertising.” International Journal of Value Based Management 10(3): 221–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boettke, Peter J. 1990. The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: The Formative Years, 1918–1928. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  14. ————— 1993. Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. ————— ed. 1994a. The Collapse of Development Planning. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  16. ————— 1994b. “The Reform Trap in Politics and Economics in the Former Communist Economies.” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 5(2/3): 267–93.Google Scholar
  17. Boettke, Peter J., and Gary Anderson. 1993. “Perestroika and Public Choice: The Economics of Autocratic Succession in a Rent Seeking Society.” Public Choice 75(2): 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. —————. 1997. “Soviet Venality: The USSR as a Mercantilist State.” Public Choice 93(1/2): 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. [1884] 1959. Capital and Interest. George D. Hunke and Hans F. Sennholz, trans. South Holland, Ill.: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
  20. Boudreaux, Donald J., and Thomas J. DiLorenzo. 1992. “The Protectionist Roots of Antitrust.” Review of Austrian Economics 6(2): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Buchanan, James M. 1969. Cost and Choice: An Inquiry into Economic Theory. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
  22. Buchanan, James M., and G.F. Thirlby. 1981. L.S.E. Essays on Cost. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cheung, Steven N.S. 1983. “The Contractual Nature of the Firm.” Journal of Law and Economics 26:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coase, Ronald, H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4:386–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cordato, Roy E. 1989. “Subjective Value, Time Passage, and the Economics of Harmful Effects.” Hamline Law Review 12(2): 229–44.Google Scholar
  26. Cowen, Tyler, ed. 1988. The Theory of Market Failure: A Critical Examination. Fairfax, Va.: George Mason University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Dauterive, Jerry W., and Mike Sibley. 1990. “Ownership Structure and Board Independence Among Small Firms.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Financial Management Association in Orlando.Google Scholar
  28. DiLorenzo, Thomas J. 1990. “The Subjectivist Roots of James Buchanan’s Economics.” Review of Austrian Economics 4:180–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ————— 1997. “The Myth of Natural Monopoly.” Review of Austrian Economics 9(2): 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Foss, Nicolai Juul. 1994. “The Theory of the Firm: The Austrians as Precursors and Critics of Contemporary Theory.” Review of Austrian Economics 7(1): 31–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garrison, Roger W. 1985. “A Subjectivist Theory of a Capital Using Economy.” In The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Gerald P. O’Driscoll, and Mario Rizzo, eds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Gordon, David. 2000. An Introduction to Economic Reasoning. Auburn, Ala.: Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  33. Gunning, J. Patrick. 1990. The New Subjectivist Revolution: An Elucidation and Extension of Ludwig von Mises’s Contribution to Economic Theory. Savage, Md.: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. Hayek, F.A. ed., 1948. “Socialist Calculation I, II, & III.” Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. ————— 1954. Capitalism and the Historians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. ————— 1967. “The Non Sequitur of the ‘Dependence Effect.’” In Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  37. High, Jack. 1984/1985. “Bork’s Paradox: Static vs. Dynamic Efficiency in Antitrust Analysis.” Comtemporary Policy Issues 3:21–34.Google Scholar
  38. Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1989. A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  39. Kirzner, Israel M. 1963. Market Theory and the Price System. Princeton N.J.: D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  40. ————— 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. ————— 1975. The Economic Point of View: An Essay in the History of Economic Thought. Kansas City, Mo.: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
  42. ————— 1979. Perception, Opportunity, and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. ————— 1985. Discovery and the Capitalist Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. —————, ed. 1986. Subjectivism, Intelligibility, and Economic Understanding. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  45. ————— 1989. Discovery, Capitalism, and Distributive Justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Klein, Peter G. 1999. “Entrepreneurship and Corporate Governance.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2(2): 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lewin, Peter, and Steven E. Phelan. 1999. “Firms, Strategies, and Resources: Contributions from Austrian Economics.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2(2): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Machlup, Fritz. 1967. “Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral, Managerial.” American Economic Review 57:1–33.Google Scholar
  49. Machovec, Fred M. 1995. Perfect Competition and the Transformation of Economics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. McChesney, Fred. 1991. “Antitrust and Regulation: Chicago’s Contradictory Views.” Cato Journal 10:775–98.Google Scholar
  51. Mises, Ludwig von. 1966. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Chicago: Regnery.Google Scholar
  52. —————. [1969] 1981. Socialism. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  53. —————. 1972. The Anti-capitalistic Mentality. South Holland, Ill.: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rizzo, Mario J. 1979. “Uncertainty, Subjectivity, and the Economic Analysis of Law.” In Rizzo, ed., Time, Uncertainty, and Disequilibrium. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books. Pp. 71–90.Google Scholar
  55. ————— 1980. “The Mirage of Efficiency.” Hofstra Law Review 8:641–58.Google Scholar
  56. Rothbard, Murray N. 1979. “Comment: The Myth of Efficiency.” In Rizzo, ed. 1979. Pp. 91–96.Google Scholar
  57. ————— 1997. “Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics.” In Rothbard, The Logic of Action I: Method, Money, and the Austrian School. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  58. ————— [1970] 1993. Man, Economy, and State. Los Angeles: Nash.Google Scholar
  59. Schmidtchen, Dieter. 1993. “Time, Uncertainty, and Subjectivism: Giving More Body to Law and Economics.” International Review of Law and Economics 13:61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shugart, William F., II. 1987. “Don’t Revise the Clayton Act, Scrap It!” Cato Journal 6:925.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, Jr., Fred L. 1983. “Why not Abolish Antitrust?” Regulation January/February 23.Google Scholar
  62. Stigler, George J. 1961. “The Economics of Information.” Journal of Political Economy 69 (June).Google Scholar
  63. ————— [1957] 1965. “Perfect Competition, Historically Contemplated.” In Stigler, Essays in the History of Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  64. Williamson, O.E. 2000. “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead.” Journal of Economic Literature 38:595–613.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter Block
    • 1
  • William Barnett
    • 1
  • Stuart Wood
    • 1
  1. 1.Loyola UniversityNew Orleans

Personalised recommendations