Austrian economics and the mainstream: View from the boundary

  • Roger E. Backhouse
Symposium: Publishing In Austrian Economics, Part 2


Austrian Economic Perfect Competition Neoclassical Economic Mainstream Economic Business Cycle Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention." In Arrow, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, Kenneth J., and Gerard Debreu. 1954. "Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy." Econometrica 22:265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backhouse, Roger E. 1995. Interpreting Macroeconomics: Explorations in the History of Macroeconomic Thought. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. —————. 1997. Truth and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. —————. 1998a. Explorations in Economic Methodology: From Lakatos to Empirical Philosophy of Science. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. —————. 1998b. "If Mathematics is Informal, Perhaps We Should Accept that Economics is Informal Too." Economic Journal 108(6): 1848–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. -----. 1999. "Modelling Invention: The Use of Models in the Neoclassical Literature on R&D." In Backhouse and Creedy, eds. (1999).Google Scholar
  8. Backhouse, Roger E., and John Creedy, eds. 1999. From Classical Economics to the Theory of the Firm: Essays in Honor of D.P O’Brien. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Blaug, Mark. 1999. "The Formalist Revolution or What Happened to Orthodox Economics after World War II." In Backhouse and Creedy, eds. (1999).Google Scholar
  10. Boettke, Peter J. 1996. "What is Wrong with Neoclassical Economics: And What is Still Wrong with Austrian Economics." In Beyond Neoclassical Economics. Fred Foldvary, ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Caldwell, Bruce, ed. 1995. "Introduction." In Contra Keynes and Cambridge: Essays, Correspondence. Vol. 9. The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. De Marchi, Neil, and Mark Blaug, eds. 1991. Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programmes. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  13. Demsetz, Harold J. 1969. "Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint." Journal of Law and Economics 11:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haberler, Gottfried. 1936. Prosperity and Depression. Geneva: League of Nations.Google Scholar
  15. Hansen, Alvin H., and H. Tout, 1934. “Annual Survey of Business Cycle Theory: Investment and Saving in Business Cycle Theory.” Econometrica 1:119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hausman, Daniel M. 1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hayek, F.A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4:33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hicks, John R. 1939. Value and Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hildenbrand, Werner. 1994. Market Demand: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hirsch, Abraham, and Neil de Marchi. 1990. Milton Friedman: Economics in Theory and Practice. New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  21. McCloskey, Donald N. 1986. The Rhetoric of Economics. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  22. Morgan, Mary S., and Malcolm Rutherford, eds. 1998. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Annual supplement to History of Political Economy 30.Google Scholar
  23. Rizzo, Mario J. 1982. “Mises and Lakatos: A Reformulation of Austrian Methodology.” In Method, Process, and Austrian Economics. Israel M. Kirzner, ed. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, Joan. 1933. Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Rothbard, Murray N. 1997. The Logic of Action I: Method, Money, and the Austrian School. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  26. Samuelson, Paul. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Vaughn, Karen I. 1994. Austrian Economics in America: The Migration of a Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. -----. 1990. “The Mengerian Roots of the Austrian Revival.” in Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics. Bruce J. Caldwell, ed. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy 22.Google Scholar
  29. Weintraub, E. Roy. 1998. “Axiomatisches Missverständniss.” Economic Journal 108(451): 1837–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger E. Backhouse
    • 1
  1. 1.the University of BirminghamUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations