Advertisement

Journal of African American Studies

, Volume 22, Issue 2–3, pp 205–217 | Cite as

Empirical Study of the Application of Double-Consciousness Among African-American Men

  • Sheena Myong Walker
ARTICLES
  • 206 Downloads

Abstract

The current study serves to add to the existing literature on African-American men and masculinity, and to provide empirical evidence of the hypothesized mental conflict that exists among African-Americans, particularly as it relates to double-consciousness. Mental conflict was measured as a function of psychological distress, surfacing in high levels of depression, anxiety, and somatization, made evident through the measurement of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). It was hypothesized that African-American men engaged in the practice of double-consciousness made evident through the scores on the General Ethnicity Questionnaire (GEQ). More specifically, those who failed to integrate and only identified with one’s Blackness and those who made drastic changes in one’s reality by taking on characteristics of the Eurocentric worldview were expected to have higher levels of psychological distress. Results from this study found a practical use of the theory of double-consciousness and further provide implications for future research on the topic.

Keywords

Double-consciousness African-American masculinity Multiple identities Intersection 

References

  1. Adams-Bass, V. N., Stevenson, H. C., & Slaughter Kotzin, D. (2014). Measuring the meaning of black media stereotypes and their relationship to the racial identity, black history knowledge, and racial socialization of African American youth. Journal of Black Studies, 45(5), 367–395.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934714530396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, R., & Bagozzi, R. (2001). Cohort differences in the structure and outcomes of an African American belief system. Journal of Black Psychology, 27(4), 367–400.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798401027004001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, J. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 615–361.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, J., & Sam, D. (1997). Acculturation and adaptation in handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, J., Poortinga, Y., Segall, M., & Dasen, P. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Black, D. (1997). The concept of manhood and the free black male of the 19th century in dismantling black manhood: An historical and literary analysis of the legacy of slavery. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc..Google Scholar
  7. Blazina (2004). Gender Role Conflict and the Disidentification Process: Two Case Studies on Fragile Masculine Self. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 12.  https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1202.151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowleg, L., English, D., del Rio-Gonzalez, A. M., Burkholder, G. J., Teti, M., & Tschann, J. M. (2016). Measuring the pros and cons of what it means to be a black man: development and validation of the black Men’s experiences scale (BMES). Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(2), 177–188.  https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brannon, T. N., Markus, H. R., & Taylor, V. J. (2015). “Two souls, two thoughts,” two self-schemas: double consciousness can have positive academic consequences for African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(4), 586–609.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ciccariello-Maher, G. (2009). A critique of Du Boisian reason: Kanye West and the fruitfulness of double-consciousness. Journal of Black Studies, 39(3), 371–401.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934706297569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clatterbaugh, K. (1990). Contemporary perspective on masculinity: Men, women, and politics I modern society. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Derogatis, L. R. (2000). Brief symptom inventory 18: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems Inc..Google Scholar
  14. Dona, G., & Berry, J. (1994). Acculturation attitudes and acculturative stress of central American refugees. International Journal of Psychology, 29(1), 57–70.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Du Bois, W. (1982). The souls of black folk. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  16. Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin, white masks. New York: Grove Press, Inc..Google Scholar
  17. Gaines, S. O., & Reed, E. S. (1995). Prejudice: from Allport to Du Bois. American Psychologist, 50, 96–103.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.2.96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, R. (2001). The ball curve: calculated racism and the stereotype of African American men. Journal of Black Studies, 32(1), 104–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunter, A. G., & Davis, J. E. (1992). Constructing gender: An exploration of Afro-American men’s conceptualization of manhood. Gender & Society, 6, 464–479.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089124392006003007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunter, A. G., & Davis, J. E. (1994). Hidden voices of Black men: The meaning, structure, and complexity of manhood. Journal of Black Studies, 25, 20–40.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002193479402500102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Itzigsohn, J., & Brown, K. (2015). Sociology and the theory of double consciousness. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 12(2), 231–248.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X15000107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jenkins, A. (1995). Psychology and African Americans: A humanistic approach (second edition). Upper Saddle River: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  23. Kilmartin, C. (2000). The masculine self. Boston: The McGraw-Hill Companies.Google Scholar
  24. Lyubansky, M., & Eidelson, R. (2005). Revisiting Du bois: the relationship between African American double consciousness and beliefs about racial and National Group Experiences. Journal of Black Psychology, 31(1), 3–26.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798404268289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McPhail, B. (2002). Gender-Bias Hate Crimes: A Review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 3(2), 125-143.  https://doi.org/10.1177/152483880020032003
  26. Moore, T. (2005). A Fanonian perspective on double consciousness. Journal of Black Studies, 35(6), 751–762.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934704263839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nobles, W. W. (1973). Psychological research and the black self-concept: a critical review. Journal of Social Issues, 29(1), 11–31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00055.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Obasi, E. (2002). Reconceptualizing the notion of self from the African deep structure. In T. Parham (Ed.), Counseling persons of African descent (pp. 52–72). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Parham, T., & Parham, W. (2002). Understanding African American mental health. In T. Parham (Ed.), Counseling persons of African descent. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  30. Rogers, L. O., Scott, M. A., & Way, N. (2015). Racial and gender identity among black adolescent males: an intersectionality perspective. Child Development, 86(2), 407–424.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sue, D. (2004). Whiteness and ethnocentric monoculturalism: making the “invisible” visible. American Psychologist, 59, 761–769.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003066X.59.8.761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomas, A., Hammond, W. P., & Kohn-Wood, L. P. (2015). Chill, be cool man: African American men, identity, coping, and aggressive ideation. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(3), 369–379.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsai, J., Ying, Y., & Lee, P. A. (2000). The meaning of “being Chinese” and “being American”: variation among Chinese American young adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 302–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wade, J. (1998). Mae Reference Group Identity Dependence: A Theory of Male Identity. The Counseling Psychologist, 26(3): 349-383.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000098263001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the Virgin IslandsSt. ThomasUS Virgin Islands

Personalised recommendations