Advertisement

Human Nature

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 399–414 | Cite as

Perceived crime severity and biological kinship

  • Vernon L. QuinseyEmail author
  • Martin L. Lalumière
  • Matthew Querée
  • Jennifer K. McNaughton
Article

Abstract

Two predictions concerning the perceived severity of crimes can be derived from evolutionary theory. The first, arising from the theory of inclusive fitness, is that crimes in general should be viewed as more serious to the degree that the victim is genetically related to the perpetrator. The second, arising from the deleterious effects of inbreeding depression, is that heterosexual sexual coercion should be perceived as more serious the closer the genetic relationship of victim and perpetrator, particularly when the victim is a female of fertile age. Two hundred and thirty university students estimated the magnitude of the severity of brief crime descriptions in three separate studies. In the first two, the biological kinship of victim and perpetrator was varied, and in the third, the hypothetical genetic relatedness of the subject and the fictitious victim was varied. All three studies found the linear relationships between biological kinship and perceived crime severity predicted by theory.

Key words

Crime severity Inbreeding Inclusive fitness Kinship relatedness Nepotism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akman, D. D., and A. Normandeau 1967 The Measurement of Crime and Delinquency in Canada. British Journal of Criminology 7:129–149.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, P. 1983 Optimal Outbreeding. In Mate Choice, P. Bateson, ed. Pp. 257–277. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Buss, D. M. 1995 Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science. Psychological Inquiry 6:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheney, D. L., and R. M. Seyfarth 1990 How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby 1992 Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange. In The Adapted Mind, J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby, eds. Pp. 163–228. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Daly, M., and M. Wilson 1982 Homicide and Kinship. American Anthropologist 84:372–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 1988a Homicide. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  8. 1988b Evolutionary Social Psychology and Family Homicide. Science 242:519–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawkins, R. 1989 The Selfish Gene. London: Palladin.Google Scholar
  10. Engen, T. 1971 Psychophysics. 2: Scaling methods. In Experimental Psychology, third ed., J. W. Kling and L. A. Riggs, eds. Pp. 47–86. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  11. Gigerenzer, G., and K. Hug 1992 Domain-specific Reasoning: Social Contracts, Cheating, and Perspective Change. Cognition 43:127–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamilton, W. D. 1964 The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leavitt, G. C. 1990 Sociobiological Explanations of Incest Avoidance: A Critical Review of Evidential Claims. American Anthropologist 92:971–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pusey, A. 1990 Mechanisms of Inbreeding Avoidance in Nonhuman Primates. In Pedophilia: Biosocial Dimensions, J. R. Feierman, ed. Pp. 201–221. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Rushton, J. P. 1989 Genetic Similarity, Human Altruism, and Group Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:503–559.Google Scholar
  16. Shepher, J. 1983 Incest: A Biosocial View. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Shields, W. M., and L. M. Shields 1983 Forcible Rape: An Evolutionary Perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology 4:115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thiessen, D., and B. Gregg 1979 Human Assortative Mating and Genetic Equilibrium: An Evolutionary Perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology 1:141–150.Google Scholar
  19. Thornhill, N. W. 1991 An Evolutionary Analysis of Rules Regulating Human Inbreeding and Marriage. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:247–293.Google Scholar
  20. van den Berghe, P. L. 1983 Human Inbreeding Avoidance: Culture in Nature. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6:91–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wolfgang, M. E., R. M. Figlio, P. E. Tracy, and S. I. Singer 1985 The National Survey of Crime Severity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Walter de Gruyter, Inc 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vernon L. Quinsey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin L. Lalumière
    • 1
  • Matthew Querée
    • 1
  • Jennifer K. McNaughton
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentQueen’s UniversityKingston

Personalised recommendations