Human Nature

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 225–261 | Cite as

Is tibetan polyandry adaptive?

Methodological and metatheoretical analyses
  • Eric Alden SmithEmail author


This paper addresses methodological and metatheoretical aspects of the ongoing debate over the adaptive significance of Tibetan polyandry. Methodological contributions include a means of estimating relatedness of fraternal co-husbands given multigenerational polyandry, and use of Hamilton’s rule and a member-joiner model to specify how inclusive fitness gains of co-husbands may vary according to seniority, opportunity costs, and group size. These methods are applied to various data sets, particularly that of Crook and Crook (1988). The metatheoretical discussion pivots on the critique by evolutionary psychologists of adaptationist accounts of polyandry. Contrary to this critique, I argue that valid adaptationist explanations of such practices do not necessitate cognitive mechanisms evolved specifically to produce polyandry, nor that there must have been exact equivalents of Tibetan agricultural estates and social institutions in human evolutionary history. Specific issues raised when one posits either kin selection or cultural evolution to explain the adaptive features of Tibetan polyandry are also discussed.

Key words

Evolutionary psychology Inclusive fitness Kin selection Mating systems Member-joiner conflicts Optimal group size Polyandry Tibet 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, Richard D. 1974 The Evolution of Social Behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5:325–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 1990 Epigenetic Rules and Darwinian Algorithms: The Adaptive Study of Learning and Development. Ethology and Sociobiology 11:241–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beall, Cynthia M., and Melvyn C. Goldstein 1981 Tibetan Fraternal Polyandry: A Test of Sociobiological Theory. American Anthropologist 83:5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blurton Jones, Nicholas G. 1990 Three Sensible Paradigms for Research on Evolution and Human Behavior? Ethology and Sociobiology 11:353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boone, James L. 1986 Parental Investment and Elite Family Structure: A Case Study of Late Medieval-Early Modern Genealogies. American Anthropologist 88:859–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique 1991 Human Behavioural Ecology. In Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, third edition, J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds. Pp. 69–98. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. 1998 Demographic Transition: Are We Coming Any Closer to an Evolutionary Explanation? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13(7), in press.Google Scholar
  8. Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique, Peter J. Richerson, Nancy W. Thornhill, and Eckart Voland 1997 The Place of Behavioural Ecological Anthropology in the Evolutionary Social Sciences. In Human by Nature: Between Biology and the Social Sciences, P. Weingart, S. D. Mitchell, P. J. Richerson, and S. Maasen, eds. Pp. 253–282. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Boyd, Robert, and Peter J. Richerson 1985 Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Buss, David M. 1989 Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassidy, Margaret L., and Gary R. Lee 1989 The Study of Polyandry: A Critique and Synthesis. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 20:1–11.Google Scholar
  12. Chao, L. 1997 Evolution of Polyandry in a Communal Breeding System. Behavioral Ecology 8:668–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock, T. H., ed. 1988 Reproductive Success: Studies in Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cosmides, Leda, and John Tooby 1987 From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link. In The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, John Dupre, ed. Pp. 277–306. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Crook, John H. 1995 Ecology and Culture in the Adaptive Radiation of Tibetan Speaking Peoples in the Himalayas. In Recent Research on Ladakh 4 & 5, Henry Osmaston and Philip Denwood, eds. Pp. 19–37. Proceedings of the Fourth and Fifth International Colloquia on Ladakh. London: School of Oriental & African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
  16. Crook, John H., and Stamati J. Crook 1988 Tibetan Polyandry: Problems of Adaptation and Fitness. In Human Reproductive Behavior, L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, and P. Turke, eds. Pp. 97–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. 1994 Explaining Tibetan Polyandry: Socio-Cultural, Demographic and Biological Perspectives. In Himalayan Buddhist Villages, J. H. Crook and H. D. Osmaston, eds. Pp. 735–786. Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  18. Crook, John H., and Tsering Shakya 1994 Six Families of Leh. In Himalayan Buddhist Villages, J. H. Crook and H. D. Osmaston, eds. Pp. 701–734. Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  19. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura 1970 An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  20. Davies, N. B., and I. R. Hartley 1996 Food Patchiness, Territory Overlap and Social Systems: An Experiment with Dunnocks (Prunella modularis). Journal of Animal Ecology 65:837–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dawkins, Richard 1982 The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  22. Durham, William H. 1991 Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Foley, Rob A. 1995 The Adaptive Legacy of Human Evolution: A Search for the Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness. Evolutionary Anthropology 4:194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gamble, Clive 1994 Timewalkers: The Prehistory of Global Colonization. Stroud: Alan Sutton.Google Scholar
  25. Goldstein, Melvyn C. 1971 Stratification, Polyandry, and Family Structure in Central Tibet. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 27:65–74.Google Scholar
  26. 1976 Fraternal Polyandry and Fertility in a High Himalayan Valley in Northwest Nepal. Human Ecology 4(3):223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 1977 Population, Social Structure and Strategic Behavior: An Essay on Polyandry, Fertility and Change in Limi Panchayat. Contributions to Nepalese Studies 4:47–62.Google Scholar
  28. 1978 Pahari and Tibetan Polyandry Revisited. Ethnology 17:325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 1981 New Perspectives on Tibetan Fertility and Population Decline. American Ethnologist 8:721–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldstein, Melvyn C., and Cynthia M. Beall 1982 Tibetan Fraternal Polyandry and Sociobiology: A Rejoinder to Abernethy and Fernandez. American Anthropologist 84:898–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goody, Jack 1976 Production and Reproduction: A Comparative Study of the Domestic Domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Grafen, Alan 1984 Natural Selection, Kin Selection and Group Selection. In Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds. Pp. 62–84. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  33. Haldane, J. B. S. 1956 The Argument from Animals to Man: An Examination of Its Validity for Anthropology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 86:1–14.Google Scholar
  34. Hamilton, William D. 1963 The Evolution of Altruistic Behaviour. American Naturalist 97:354–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 1975 Innate Social Aptitudes of Man: An Approach from Evolutionary Genetics. In Biosocial Anthropology, R. Fox, ed. Pp. 133–155. London: Malaby.Google Scholar
  36. Hiatt, L. R. 1980 Polyandry in Sri Lanka: A Test Case for Parental Investment Theory. Man (n.s.) 15:583–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Irons, William G. 1979 Natural Selection, Adaptation, and Human Social Behavior. In Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, N. Chagnon and W. Irons, eds. Pp. 4–39. North Scituate, Massachusetts: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  38. 1990 Let’s Make Our Perspective Broader Rather Than Narrower: A Comment on Turke’s “Which Humans Behave Adaptively, and Why Does It Matter?” and on the So-Called DA-DP Debate. Ethology and Sociobiology 11:361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 1998 Adaptively Relevant Environments and the Study of Human Adaptation. Evolutionary Anthropology, in press.Google Scholar
  40. Kaplan, Hillard S., Jane B. Lancaster, John A. Bock, and S. E. Johnson 1995 Fertility and Fitness among Albuquerque Men: A Competitive Labour Market Theory. In Human Reproductive Decisions: Biological and Social Perspectives, R. I. M. Dunbar, ed. Pp. 96–136. London: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kelly, Robert L. 1995 The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kitcher, Philip 1985 Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Levine, Nancy E. 1988 The Dynamics of Polyandry: Kinship, Domesticity, and Population on the Tibetan Border. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Levine, Nancy E., and Walter H. Sangree 1980 Conclusion: Asian and African Systems of Polyandry. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 11:385–410.Google Scholar
  45. Levine, Nancy E., and Joan B. Silk 1997 Why Polyandry Fails: Sources of Instability in Polyandrous Marriages. Current Anthropology 38:375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Potts, Rick 1996 Humanity’s Descent: The Consequences of Ecological Instability. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  47. Rogers, Alan R. 1990 The Evolutionary Economics of Human Reproduction. Ethology and Sociobiology 11:479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schuler, Sidney Ruth 1987 The Other Side of Polyandry: Property, Stratification, and Nonmarriage in the Nepal Himalayas. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sherman, Paul W., and Hudson K. Reeve 1996 Forward and Backward: Alternative Approaches to Studying Human Social Evolution. In Evolution and Human Behavior: A Critical Reader, Laura M. Betzig, ed. Pp. 147–158. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, Eric Alden 1983 Anthropological Applications of Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review. Current Anthropology 24:625–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 1985 Inuit Foraging Groups: Some Simple Models Incorporating Conflicts of Interest, Relatedness, and Central-Place Sharing. Ethology and Sociobiology 6:27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Symons, Donald 1989 A Critique of Darwinian Anthropology. Ethology and Sociobiology 10:131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 1990 Adaptiveness and Adaptation. Ethology and Sociobiology 11:427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 1992 On the Use and Misuse of Darwinism in the Study of Human Behavior. In The Adapted Mind; Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby, eds. Pp. 137–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Thomas, Nicholas 1989 Domestic Structures and Polyandry in the Marquesas Islands. In Family and Gender in the Pacific: Domestic Contradictions and the Colonial Impact, Margaret Jolly and Martha Macintyre, eds. Pp. 65–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Tooby, John, and Leda Cosmides 1990 The Past Explains the Present: Emotional Adaptations and the Structure of Ancestral Environments. Ethology and Sociobiology 11:375–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 1992 The Psychological Foundation of Culture. In the Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby, eds. Pp. 19–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tooby, John, and Irven DeVore 1987 The Reconstruction of Hominid Behavioral Evolution Through Strategic Modeling. In The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models, Warren G. Kinzey, ed. Pp. 183–237. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  59. Turke, Paul W. 1990 Which Humans Behave Adaptively, and Why Does It Matter? Ethology and Sociobiology 11:305–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Werren, John H., and H. Ronald Pulliam 1981 An Intergenerational Model of the Cultural Evolution of Helping Behavior. Human Ecology 9:465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whittingham, L. A., P. O. Dunn, and R. D. Magrath 1997 Relatedness, Polyandry and Extra-Group Paternity in the Cooperatively-Breeding White-Browed Scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 40:261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Walter de Gruyter, Inc 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattle

Personalised recommendations