Advertisement

Human Nature

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Social Signaling and the Warrior-Big-Man among the Western Dani

A Man Called Tibenuk
  • Paul RoscoeEmail author
  • Richard J. Chacon
  • Douglas Hayward
  • Yamilette Chacon
Article

Abstract

We employ the Social Signaling Model (SSM) and life history of a Western Dani big-man, Tibenuk, to analyze a neglected curiosity in the career of the big-man type. The big-man is renowned as an economic entrepreneur, the master of material displays. In New Guinea, however, big-men had invariably first gained fame and some influence as eminent warriors. The SSM accounts for this two-part career path by proposing that small-scale social organization rests on honest, competitive signaling of individual and collective fighting strength, with leaders being those who excel in these contests. The performances for which big-men are already known, conspicuous ceremonial displays, broadcast this strength indirectly. Explicitly conceptualized as symbolic fighting, they constituted indexical proxies for their sponsors’ individual and collective willingness and ability to fight. Success on the battlefield, though, signaled fighting strength more directly. Men therefore had to demonstrate strength on both the battlefield and the ceremonial ground if they were to become big-men. This was Tibenuk’s achievement. When he was young and at his physical peak, he demonstrated outstanding capability in war. War is a young man’s game, however, and as his physical capacities waned, he shifted to politics, an older man’s game, honing his political talents and developing extensive political networks that allowed him to sponsor massive pig feasts, the principal form of conspicuous ceremonial display. Tibenuk’s career also reveals synergies between warrior and political talents that hitherto have been overlooked in big-man analysis.

Keywords

New Guinea Western Dani Big-man Social signaling model Warfare Leadership 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are deeply grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions for improvements of the paper. To the extent space allowed, we sought to incorporate or address all of their points; whatever failings remain, we must stress, are our own.

References

  1. Allen, B. J. (1976) Information flow and innovation diffusion in the East Sepik District, Papua New Guinea. PhD thesis. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  2. Bergmann, W. (1971). The Kamanuku: The culture of the Chimbu tribes (4 vols). Harrisville: H.F.W. Bergmann.Google Scholar
  3. Bliege Bird, R., & Power, E. A. (2015). Prosocial signaling and cooperation among Martu hunters. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, P. (1971). The Chimbu political system. In R. M. Berndt & P. Lawrence (Eds.), Politics in New Guinea: Traditional and in the context of change. Some anthropological perspectives (pp. 207–223). Nedlands & Seattle: University of Western Australia Press and University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, P. (1972). The Chimbu: A study of change in the New Guinea Highlands. Cambridge: Schenkman.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, P., & Buchbinder, G. (1976). Introduction. In P. Brown & G. Buchbinder (Eds.), Man and woman in the New Guinea highlands (pp. 1–12). Washington DC: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
  8. Bulmer, R. N. H. (1960). Leadership and social structure among the Kyaka people of the Western Highlands District of New Guinea. PhD thesis. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  9. Burridge, K. O. L. (1975). The Melanesian manager. In J. M. Beattie & R. G. Lienhardt (Eds.), Studies in social anthropology: Essays in memory of E. E. Evans-Pritchard (pp. 86–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chacon, R., & Hayward, D. (2017). Tibenuk and Chuji: Status attainment and collective action in egalitarian settings. In R. Chacon & R. Mendoza (Eds.), Feast, famine or fighting? Multiple pathways to social complexity (pp. 223–248). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D., Gibson, R. M., & Guinness, F. E. (1979). The logical stag: Adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Animal Behavior, 27, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Codere, H. (1950). Fighting with property: A study of Kwakiutl potlatching and warfare, 1792–1930. New York: J.J. Augustin.Google Scholar
  13. Enquist, M., & Leimar, O. (1990). The evolution of fatal fighting. Animal Behavior, 39, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flannery, K., & Marcus, J. (2012). The creation of inequality: How our prehistoric ancestors set the stage for monarchy, slavery, and empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glowacki, L., & von Rueden, C. (2015). Leadership solves collective action problems in small-scale societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370, 20150010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Godelier, M. (1986). The making of great men. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hagen, E. H., & Bryant, G. A. (2003). Music and dance as a coalitional signaling system. Human Nature, 14, 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison, S. (1993). The mask of war: Violence, ritual and the self in Melanesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hauser-Schäublin, B. (2015). Ceremonial houses of the Abelam, Papua New Guinea: Architecture and ritual—A passage to the ancestors. Goolwa: Crawford House.Google Scholar
  20. Hayden, B. (1998). Practical and prestige technologies: The evolution of material systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayward, D. (1997). Vernacular Christianity among the Mulia Dani: An ethnography of religious belief among the Western Dani of Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  22. Heider, K. G. (1970). The Dugum Dani: A Papuan culture in the Highlands of West New Guinea. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, P. L. (1982). Gainj kinship and social organization. PhD dissertation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  24. Kaberry, P. M. (1971). Political organization among the Northern Abelam. In R. M. Berndt & P. Lawrence (Eds.), Politics in New Guinea: Traditional and in the context of change: Some anthropological perspectives (pp. 35–73). Nedlands & Seattle: University of Western Australia Press & University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  25. Larson, G. F. (1987). The structure and demography of the cycle of warfare among the Ilaga Dani of Irian Jaya. PhD dissertation.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  26. Lawrence, P. (1971). Introduction. In R. M. Berndt & P. Lawrence (Eds.), Politics in New Guinea: Traditional and in the context of change: Some anthropological perspectives (pp. 1–34). Nedlands & Seattle: University of Western Australia Press & University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lederman, R. (1986). What gifts engender: Social relations and politics in Mendi, Highland Papua New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meggitt, M. J. (1965). The lineage system of the Mae-Enga of New Guinea. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
  29. Meggitt, M. J. (1971). The pattern of leadership among the Mae-Enga of New Guinea. In R. M. Berndt & P. Lawrence (Eds.), Politics in New Guinea: Traditional and in the context of change: Some anthropological perspectives (pp. 191–206). Nedlands & Seattle: University of Western Australia Press & University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  30. Meggitt, M. J. (1977). Blood is their argument: Warfare among the Mae Enga tribesmen of the New Guinea Highlands. Palo Alto: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  31. Newman, P. L. (1965). Knowing the Gururumba. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  32. O’Brien, D. (1969). The economics of Dani marriage: An analysis of marriage payments in a highland New Guinea society. PhD dissertation. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
  33. O’Hanlon, M. (1989). Reading the skin: Adornment, display and society among the Wahgi. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
  34. Oosterwal, G. (1963). Die Papua: Von der Kultur eines Naturvolkes. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  35. Philsooph, H. A. (1980). A study of a West Sepik People, New Guinea, with special reference to their system of beliefs, kinship and marriage, and principles of thought. PhD dissertation. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  36. Price, M. E., & Van Vugt, M. (2014). The evolution of leader-follower reciprocity: The theory of service-for-prestige. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–17.Google Scholar
  37. Price, M. E., & Van Vugt, M. (2015). The service-for-prestige theory of leader-follower relations: A review of the evolutionary psychology and anthropology literatures. In R. D. Arvey & S. M. Colarelli (Eds.), Biological foundations of organizational behavior (pp. 169–201). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Reay, M. (1959). The Kuma: Freedom and conformity in the New Guinea Highlands. Carlton: Melbourne University Press on behalf of the Australian National University.Google Scholar
  39. Roscoe, P. (2000). New Guinea leadership as ethnographic analogy: A critical review. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7, 79–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roscoe, P. (2001). “Strength” and sexuality: Sexual avoidance and masculinity in New Guinea and Amazonia. In T. Gregor & D. Tuzin (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on gender in Amazonia and Melanesia (pp. 279–308). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Roscoe, P. (2009a). Social signaling and the organization of small-scale society: the case of contact-era New Guinea. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 16, 69–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roscoe, P. (2009b). Symbolic violence and ceremonial peace. In M. Dickhardt, E. Hermann, & K. Klenke (Eds.), Form, Macht, Differenz: Festschrift für Brigitta Hauser-Schäublin (pp. 207–214). Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.Google Scholar
  43. Roscoe, P. (2012a). Before elites: The political capacities of big-men. In T. L. Kienlin & A. Zimmerman (Eds.), Before elites: Alternatives to hierarchical systems in modelling social formations (Vol. 1, pp. 41–54). Bonn: Rudolp Habelt.Google Scholar
  44. Roscoe, P. (2012b). Social signaling, conflict management, and the construction of peace. In D. P. Fry (Ed.), War, peace, and human nature: The convergence of evolutionary and cultural views (pp. 475–494). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Roscoe, P. (2017). The emergence of sociopolitical complexity: The evidence from contact-era New Guinea. In R. J. Chacon & R. G. Mendoza (Eds.), Feast, famine, or fighting: Multiple pathways to social complexity (pp. 197–222). New York & Philadelphia: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roscoe, P. (n.d.a). The perplexing heterarchical complexity of some New Guinea polities at contact. In M. Fernandez-Gotz (Ed.), Power from below. (In preparation)Google Scholar
  47. Roscoe, P. (n.d.b). Unpublished field notes on the Yangoru Boiken from the 1979–1981, 1986, and 1991 field seasons. Files in the author’s possession, Orono, ME.Google Scholar
  48. Roscoe, P. (n.d.c). Trade, exchange, and the workings of a “prestige” economy in contact-era New Guinea. In J. Ling, R. Chacon, & K. Kristiansen (Eds.), Trade before civilization. (Under review)Google Scholar
  49. Sahlins, M. D. (1963). Poor man, rich man, big-man, chief: Political types in Melanesia and Polynesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5, 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strathern, A. (1971). The rope of Moka: Big-men and ceremonial exchange in Mount Hagen, New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Strathern, A., & Stewart, P. J. (2007). Collaborations and conflicts: A leader through time. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  52. Tuzin, D. F. (1980). The voice of the Tambaran: Truth and illusion in Ilahita Arapesh religion. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Vicedom, G. F. & Tischner, H. (1953). The Mbowamb: The culture of the Mount Hagen tribes in east central New Guinea, Vol. 2. F. E. Rheinstein & E. Klestadt (transl.). Unpublished ms. on file, Menzies Library, Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  54. von Rueden, C., Lukaszewski, A., & Gurven, M. (2015). Adaptive personality calibration in a human society: Effects of embodied capital on prosocial traits. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 1071–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wassmann, J. (1991). The song to the flying fox: The public and esoteric knowledge of the important men of Kandingei about totemic songs, names and knotted cords (Middle Sepik, Papua New Guinea). D. Q. Stephenson (transl.). Boroko, PNG: National Research Institute.Google Scholar
  56. Westermann, T. (1968). The mountain people: Social institutions of the Laiapu Enga. Wapenamanda: New Guinea Lutheran Mission.Google Scholar
  57. Wiessner, P. (2009). The power of one? Big men revisited. In K. J. Vaughn, J. W. Eerkens, & J. Kantner (Eds.), The evolution of leadership: Transitions in decision making from small-scale to middle-range societies (pp. 195–222). Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research.Google Scholar
  58. Wiessner, P. W., & Tumu, A. (1998). Historical vines: Enga networks of exchange, ritual, and warfare in Papua New Guinea. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  59. Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: the status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wormsley, W.E. (1978). Imbonggu culture and change: Traditional society, labor migration and change in the Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea. PhD dissertation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of MaineOronoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology, Criminology, and AnthropologyWinthrop UniversityRock HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of Anthropology and Department of Intercultural StudiesBiola UniversityLa MiradaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyJames Madison UniversityHarrisonburgUSA

Personalised recommendations