Advertisement

Human Nature

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 117–141 | Cite as

When Saying “Sorry” Isn’t Enough: Is Some Suicidal Behavior a Costly Signal of Apology?

A Cross-Cultural Test
  • Kristen L. Syme
  • Edward H. HagenEmail author
Article

Abstract

Lethal and nonlethal suicidal behaviors are major global public health problems. Much suicidal behavior (SB) occurs after the suicide victim committed a murder or other serious transgression. The present study tested a novel evolutionary model termed the Costly Apology Model (CAM) against the ethnographic record. The bargaining model (BRM) sees nonlethal suicidal behavior as an evolved costly signal of need in the wake of adversity. Relying on this same theoretical framework, the CAM posits that nonlethal suicidal behavior can sometimes serve as an honest signal of apology in the wake of committing a severe transgression, thereby repairing valuable social relationships. To test this hypothesis, the CAM was operationalized into a set of variables, and two independent coders coded 473 text records on suicidal behavior from 53 cultures from the probability sample of the Human Relations Area Files. The results indicated that in ethnographic accounts of suicidal behavior, transgressions, punishment, and shame were relatively common, supporting the CAM, but explicit motives to apologize and evidence of forgiveness were rare, contrary to the CAM. The theoretical variables of the CAM nevertheless formed a cluster distinct from the BRM, and a subset of cases of suicidal behavior were largely related to transgressions and other CAM variables rather than BRM or other variables. Support for the CAM varied widely across cultures, but there was evidence for it in every major geographical region. Exploratory analyses suggested that the CAM is potentially more likely to occur in response to severe conflicts concerning transgressions committed against nonkin. Furthermore, in text records that involved transgressions, male suicidal behavior was most frequently associated with murder, whereas female suicidal behavior was most frequently associated with sexual transgressions. In conclusion, the results provided mixed support for the hypothesis that some instances of suicidal behavior function to send a costly signal of apology to those harmed by a transgression.

Keywords

Suicidal behavior Cross-cultural analysis Costly signaling Bargaining Mental health Evolutionary medicine 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by NSF-BCS #1355469. We thank Caitlyn Calsbeek for assistance coding the text records, and Paul Andrews, Andy Thomson, Benjamin Gelbart, and one anonymous reviewer for numerous useful comments and suggestions.

Supplementary material

12110_2018_9333_MOESM1_ESM.docx (282 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 282 kb)

References

  1. Andrews, P. W. (2006). Parent-offspring conflict and cost-benefit analysis in adolescent suicidal behavior: Effects of birth order and dissatisfaction with mother on attempt incidence and severity. Human Nature, 17, 190–211.Google Scholar
  2. Aschwanden, H. (1987). Symbols of death: An analysis of the consciousness of the Karanga. Gweru, Zimbabwe: Mambo Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ausubel, L. M., Cramton, P., & Deneckere, R. J. (2002). Bargaining with incomplete information. In R. J. Aumann & S. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of game theory with economic applications (Vol. 3, pp. 1897–1945). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  4. Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390–1396.Google Scholar
  5. Bakeman, R., McArthur, D., Quera, V., & Robinson, B. F. (1997). Detecting sequential patterns and determining their reliability with fallible observers. Psychological Methods, 2(4), 357–370.Google Scholar
  6. Betzig, L. (2012). Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: Comparative evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 309–317.Google Scholar
  7. Bottom, W. P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S. E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13(5), 497–513.Google Scholar
  8. Bullough, V. (1976). Sexual variance in history and society. New York: John Willey and Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251–255.Google Scholar
  10. Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3(1), 11–27.Google Scholar
  11. DeCatanzaro, D. (1980). Human suicide: A biological perspective. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 265–290.Google Scholar
  12. DeCatanzaro, D. (1991). Evolutionary limits to self-preservation. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
  13. Ekman, P., & Cordaro, D. (2011). What is meant by calling emotions basic? Emotion Review, 3(4), 364–370.Google Scholar
  14. Elwin, V. (1943). Maria murder and suicide. Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (2009). Cross-cultural research methods. Lanham: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  16. Farberow, N. L., & Shneidman, E. S. (1961). The cry for help. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 894–914.Google Scholar
  18. Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Flustered and faithful: Embarrassment as a signal of prosociality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 81–97.Google Scholar
  19. Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa, part I: The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(6), 543–549.Google Scholar
  20. Fessler, D. M. (2004). Shame in two cultures: Implications for evolutionary approaches. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(2), 207–262.Google Scholar
  21. Fessler, D. M. (2007). From appeasement to conformity. In J. L. Tracy, R. W. Robins, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 174–193). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  22. Firth, R. (1936). We, the Tikopia: Kinship in primitive Polynesia. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  23. Firth, R. (1940). The work of the gods in Tikopia. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  24. Firth, R. (1961). Suicide and risk-taking in Tikopia society. Psychiatry, 24(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  25. Fry, D. P. (1992). Female aggression among the Zapotec of Oaxaca, Mexico. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemelä (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 187–199). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel hierarchical models (Vol. 1). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. (1956). Embarrassment and social organization. American Journal of Sociology, 62(3), 264–271.Google Scholar
  28. Hadjiyannakis, C. (1969). Les tendances contemporaines concernant la répression du délit d’adultère: Étude de droit français et de droit comparé. University of Renne, France.Google Scholar
  29. Hagen, E. H. (1999). The functions of postpartum depression. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 325–359.Google Scholar
  30. Hagen, E. H. (2002). Depression as bargaining: The case postpartum. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 323–336.Google Scholar
  31. Hagen, E. H. (2003). The bargaining model of depression. In P. Hammerstein (Ed.), Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation (pp. 95–123). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hagen, E. H., Watson, P. J., & Hammerstein, P. (2008). Gestures of despair and hope: A view on deliberate self-harm from economics and evolutionary biology. Biological Theory, 3, 123–138.Google Scholar
  33. Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2006). Sex differences in indirect aggression: Psychological evidence from young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(3), 231–245.Google Scholar
  34. Hezel, F. X. (1984). Cultural patterns in Trukese suicide. Ethnology, 23, 193–206.Google Scholar
  35. Hieb, L. A. (1973). The Hopi ritual clown: Life as it should not be. PhD dissertation, Princeton University. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
  36. Howell, P. P. (1970). A manual of Nuer law: Being an account of customary law, its evolution and development in the courts established by the Sudan government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Gilovich, T., & Ariely, D. (2013). Moral masochism: On the connection between guilt and self-punishment. Emotion, 13(1), 14–18.Google Scholar
  38. Johnson, D. H. (1986). Judicial regulation and administrative control: Customary law and the Nuer, 1898–1954. Journal of African History, 27(1), 59–78.Google Scholar
  39. Johnson, J. G., Cohen, P., Gould, M. S., Kasen, S., Brown, J., & Brook, J. S. (2002). Childhood adversities, interpersonal difficulties, and risk for suicide attempts during late adolescence and early adulthood. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59(8), 741–749.Google Scholar
  40. Joiner, T. E. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kang, H. K., Bullman, T. A., Smolenski, D. J., Skopp, N. A., Gahm, G. A., & Reger, M. A. (2015). Suicide risk among 1.3 million veterans who were on active duty during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Annals of Epidemiology, 25(2), 96–100.Google Scholar
  42. Kennan, J., & Wilson, R. (1993). Bargaining with private information. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 45–104.Google Scholar
  43. Klonsky, E. (2011). Non-suicidal self-injury in United States adults: Prevalence, sociodemographics, topography and functions. Psychological Medicine, 41(09), 1981–1986.Google Scholar
  44. Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (1999). Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 401(6755), 788–791.Google Scholar
  45. Litz, B. T., Stein, N., Delaney, E., Lebowitz, L., Nash, W. P., Silva, C., & Maguen, S. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(8), 695–706.Google Scholar
  46. Malinowski, B. (1926). Crime and custom in savage society. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  47. Maynard Smith, J., & Harper, D. (2003). Animal signals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Meacham, F., Perlmutter, A., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2013). Honest signalling with costly gambles. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(87), 20130469.Google Scholar
  49. Meyerowitz, E. L.-R. (1974). The early history of the Akan states of Ghana. London: Red Candle Press.Google Scholar
  50. Munoz, S. R., & Bangdiwala, S. I. (1997). Interpretation of Kappa and B statistics measures of agreement. Journal of Applied Statistics, 24(1), 105–112.Google Scholar
  51. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (producer) (2003). Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) [Online]. http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars
  52. Nelissen, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2009). When guilt evokes self-punishment: Evidence for the existence of a dobby effect. Emotion, 9(1), 118.Google Scholar
  53. Nock, M. K. (2008). Actions speak louder than words: An elaborated theoretical model of the social functions of self-injury and other harmful behaviors. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 12(4), 159–168.Google Scholar
  54. Nock, M. K., Borges, G., Bromet, E. J., Cha, C. B., Kessler, R. C., & Lee, S. (2008). Suicide and suicidal behavior. Epidemiologic Reviews, 30(1), 133–154.Google Scholar
  55. Ohbuchi, K.-i., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 219–227.Google Scholar
  56. Ohtsubo, Y., & Watanabe, E. (2009). Do sincere apologies need to be costly? Test of a costly signaling model of apology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(2), 114–123.Google Scholar
  57. Okamoto, K., & Matsumura, S. (2000). The evolution of punishment and apology: An iterated prisoner’s dilemma model. Evolutionary Ecology, 14(8), 703–720.Google Scholar
  58. Paul, L., & Galloway, J. (1994). Sexual jealousy: Gender differences in response to partner and rival. Aggressive Behavior, 20(3), 203–211.Google Scholar
  59. Rohner, R. P., & Chaki-Sircar, M. (1988). Women and children in a Bengali village. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  60. Ronce, O. (2007). How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38, 231–253.Google Scholar
  61. Rosenthal, R. W. (1993). Suicide attempts and signalling games. Mathematical Social Sciences, 26(1), 25–33.Google Scholar
  62. Sagarin, B. J., Becker, D. V., Guadagno, R. E., Nicastle, L. D., & Millevoi, A. (2003). Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy: The moderating influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
  63. Shankar, V., & Bangdiwala, S. I. (2014). Observer agreement paradoxes in 2×2 tables: Comparison of agreement measures. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 100.Google Scholar
  64. Shinichirō, T., & Harrison, J. A. (1960). The Ainu of northern Japan: A study in conquest and acculturation. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 50(4), 1–88.Google Scholar
  65. Spence, M. (1974). Market signaling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Stengel, E. (1956). The social effects of attempted suicide. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 74(2), 116–120.Google Scholar
  67. Syme, K. L., Garfield, Z. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2016). Testing the bargaining vs. inclusive fitness models of suicidal behavior against the ethnographic record. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(3), 179–192.Google Scholar
  68. Sznycer, D., Takemura, K., Delton, A. W., Sato, K., Robertson, T., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2012). Cross-cultural differences and similarities in proneness to shame: An adaptationist and ecological approach. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(2), 352–370.Google Scholar
  69. Sznycer, D., Al-Shawaf, L., Bereby-Meyer, Y., Curry, O. S., De Smet, D., Ermer, E., et al. (2017). Cross-cultural regularities in the cognitive architecture of pride. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(8), 1874–1879.Google Scholar
  70. Tanaka, H., Yagi, A., Komiya, A., Mifune, N., & Ohtsubo, Y. (2015). Shame-prone people are more likely to punish themselves: A test of the reputation-maintenance explanation for self-punishment. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9(1), 7.Google Scholar
  71. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.Google Scholar
  72. von Rueden, C. R., & Jaeggi, A. V. (2016). Men’s status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(39), 10824–10829.Google Scholar
  73. Watson, P. J., & Andrews, P. W. (2002). Toward a revised evolutionary adaptationist analysis of depression: The social navigation hypothesis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 72, 1–14.Google Scholar
  74. Wilson, M. I., & Daly, M. (1992). Who kills whom in spouse killings? On the exceptional sex ratio of spousal homicides in the United States. Criminology, 30(2), 189–216.Google Scholar
  75. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.Google Scholar
  76. Zahavi, A. (1993). The fallacy of conventional signalling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 340(1292), 227–230.Google Scholar
  77. Zialcita, F. N. (1986). Popular interpretations of the passion of Christ. Philippine Sociological Review, 56–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations