Advertisement

Human Nature

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 372–394 | Cite as

The Faith of Sacrifice: Leadership Trade-Offs in an Afro-Brazilian Religion

  • Montserrat SolerEmail author
Article

Abstract

Despite secular trends in some countries, prestige-based authority in the form of religious leadership remains hugely influential in the everyday lives of millions of people around the world. Here, the costs and benefits of religious leadership are explored in an urban setting in northeastern Brazil. An economic game, within-group cooperation questionnaires, and social network analyses were carried out among adherents of an Afro-Brazilian religion. Results reveal that leaders display high levels of religious commitment and disproportionally provide cooperative services to group members. On the other hand, initiates cooperate less than leaders but do not differ in levels of received cooperation or social cohesion measures. This may indicate some level of exploitation or free-riding. Demographic and group variables also appear to play an important role in the degree of social cohesion a group achieves. These findings are discussed in the context of non-Western urban settings where religious leadership may represent both an alternative to social advancement and a crucial source of material aid, social support, and a strong sense of community.

Keywords

Leadership Cooperation Religion Social networks Brazil Afro-Brazilian Religion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research presented here was funded by a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant 0519236, Wenner Gren Dissertation Fieldwork Grant, and a University of California, Santa Barbara Non-Senate Faculty Fieldwork Grant. Mãe Vanda (QEPD) suggested the title of this article, and Almir dos Santos Moreira was an invaluable part of the data collection.

Supplementary material

12110_2016_9264_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (179 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 179 kb)

References

  1. Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. The American Economic Review, 99, 544–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atran, S. (2003). Genesis of suicide terrorism. Science, 299(5612), 1534–1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2008). What is middle class about the middle classes around the world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 3–41A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee, A., Chandrasekhar, A. G., Duflo, E., & Jackson, M. O. (2013). The diffusion of microfinance. Science, 341(6144), 1236498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bastide, R. (2001) [1958]. O Candomblé da Bahia. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
  6. Boehm, C. (2009). Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies..Google Scholar
  8. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Case, A., & Paxson, C. (2006). Stature and status: height, ability, and labor market outcomes. NBER Working Paper No. 12466. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w12466
  12. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chestnut, A. (2003). Competitive spirits. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cronk, L. (1994). Evolutionary theories of morality and the manipulative use of signals. Zygon, 29(1), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Aguiar, R., & Cronk, L. (2011). Stratification and supernatural punishment: Cooperation or obedience? Religion, Brain and Behavior, 1, 73–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deaton, A., & Arora, R. (2009). Life at the top: the benefits of height. Economics and Human Biology, 7(2), 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeBruine L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L. G., Perrett, D. I., Penton-Voak, I. A., Cooper, P. A., Penke, L., Feinberg, D. R., & Tiddeman, B. P. (2006) Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1355–1360.Google Scholar
  18. Easterly, W. (2001). The middle class consensus and economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fink, B., Neave, N., & Seydel, H. (2007). Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  21. Fry, P. (1995). Male homosexuality and Afro-Brazilian possession cults. In Stephen O. Murray, (Ed.) Latin American male homosexualities (pp. 193–220). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  22. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: a 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glowacki, L., & von Rueden, C. (2015). Leadership solves collective action problems in small-scale societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 370(1683), doi:  10.1098/rstb.2015.0010.
  24. Halman, L., & Draulans, V. (2006). How secular is Europe? British Journal of Sociology, 7(2), 263–288.Google Scholar
  25. Hanneman, R., & Riddle, M. (2005) Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California. (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/)
  26. Harbaugh, W. T. (1998). The prestige motive for making charitable transfers. American Economic Review, 88(2), 277–282.Google Scholar
  27. Harding, R. E. (2000). A refuge in thunder. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Harper, D., & Maynard Smith, J. (2003). Animal signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (2004). Foundations of human sociality: economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., and Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29.Google Scholar
  32. Huisman, M. (2009). Imputation of missing network data: some simple procedures. Journal of Social Structure, 10(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  33. Huisman, J., & Smits, J. (2009). Effects of household-and district-level factors on primary school enrollment in 30 developing countries. World Development, 37(1), 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Irons, W. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In R. Neese (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 292–309). New York: Russel Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, D. (2015). God is watching you: How the fear of god makes us human. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Johnson, R. T., Burk, J. A., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2007). Dominance and prestige as differential predictors of aggression and testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(5), 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaplan, H., & Hill, K. (1985). Hunting ability and reproductive success among Ache foragers: preliminary results. Current Anthropology, 26, 131–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Katz, R. (1984). Boiling energy: Community healing among the Kalahari Kung. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kendall, L. (1985). Shamans, housewives, and other restless spirits: Women in Korean ritual life. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  40. King, A. J., Johnson, D. D., & Van Vugt, M. (2009). The origins and evolution of leadership. Current Biology, 19(19), R911–R916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Klofstad, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Peters, S. (2012). Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1738), 2698–2704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kurvers, R. H., Eijkelenkamp, B., van Oers, K., van Lith, B., van Wieren, S. E., Ydenberg, R. C., & Prins, H. H. (2009). Personality differences explain leadership in barnacle geese. Animal Behaviour, 78(2), 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Landes, R. (1947). The city of women. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  44. Leblond, C., & Reebs, S. G. (2006). Individual leadership and boldness in shoals of golden shiners (Notemigonus crysoleucas). Behaviour, 143(10), 1263–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee, P. C., & Moss, C. J. (2012). Wild female African elephants (Loxodonta africana) exhibit personality traits of leadership and social integration. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126(3), 224–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lima, V. C. (2003) [1977] A famila de santo nos Candomblés Nagôs da Bahia. Corrupio: Salvador.Google Scholar
  47. Maransky, B. P., & Bildstein, K. L. (2001). Follow your elders: Age-related differences in the migration behavior of broad-winged hawks at Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, Pennsylvania. The Wilson Bulletin, 113(3), 350–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Matory, J. L. (2005). Black Atlantic religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Matthews, Z., Channon, A., Neal, S., Osrin, D., Madise, N., & Stones, W. (2010). Examining the “urban advantage” in maternal health care in developing countries. PLoS Medicine, 7(9), e1000327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McComb, K., Shannon, G., Durant, S. M., Sayialel, K., Slotow, R., Poole, J., & Moss, C. (2011). Leadership in elephants: the adaptive value of age. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1722), 3270–3276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McNamara, R. A., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2016). Supernatural punishment, in-group biases, and material insecurity: experiments and ethnography from Yasawa, Fiji. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 6(1), 34–55.Google Scholar
  52. Miller, D. E., & Yamamori, T. (2007). Global Pentecostalism: The new face of Christian social engagement. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Norenzayan, A., & Gervais, W. M. (2013). The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393(6685), 573–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437(7063), 1291–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Panchanathan, K., & Boyd, R. (2004). Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem. Nature, 432(7016), 499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D. R., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L., & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Purzycki, B. G. (2013). The minds of gods: a comparative study of supernatural agency. Cognition, 129(1), 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reader, S. M., Kendal, J. R., & Laland, K. N. (2003). Social learning of foraging sites and escape routes in wild Trinidadian guppies. Animal Behaviour, 66(4), 729–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2008). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Robbins, J. (2004). The globalization of Pentecostal and charismatic Christianity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rogers, E. M. (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sahlins, M. D. (1963). Poor man, rich man, big-man, chief: political types in Melanesia and Polynesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5(03), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276(1656), 575–584.Google Scholar
  67. Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809.Google Scholar
  68. Smith, E. A., Bird, R. B., & Bird, D. W. (2003). The benefits of costly signaling: Meriam turtle hunters. Behavioral Ecology, 14(1), 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Soler, M. (2012). Costly signaling, ritual and cooperation: evidence from Candomblé, an Afro-Brazilian religion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 346–356.Google Scholar
  70. Soler, M., Batiste, F., & Cronk, L. (2014). In the eyes (and ears) of the beholder: receiver psychology and human signal design. Evolutionary Anthropology, 23(4), 136–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Soler, M., & Lenfesty, H. (2016) Coerced coordination, not cooperation: A response to Norenzayan et al.’s The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e24.Google Scholar
  72. Sosis, R. (2000). Religion and intragroup cooperation: Preliminary results of a comparative analysis of utopian communities. Cross-Cultural Research, 34(1), 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sosis, R. (2003). Why aren’t we all Hutterites? Human Nature, 14(2), 91–127.Google Scholar
  74. Sosis, R., & Bressler, E. R. (2003). Cooperation and commune longevity: a test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research, 37(2), 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sosis, R., & Ruffle, B. J. (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular kibbutzim. Current Anthropology, 44(5), 713–722.Google Scholar
  76. Tigue, C. C., Borak, D. J., O'Connor, J. J., Schandl, C., & Feinberg, D. R. (2012). Voice pitch influences voting behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(3), 210–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Treiman, D. J. (2013). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  78. United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects, 2014 revision. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf
  79. Valente, T. W., & Davis, R. L. (1999). Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of the Political and Social Sciences, 566, 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Valente, T. W., Coronges, K., Lakon, C., & Costenbader, E. (2008). How correlated are network centrality measures? Connections, 28(1), 16–26.Google Scholar
  81. Van Vugt, M., De Cremer, D., & Janssen, D. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition: the male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18(1), 19–23.Google Scholar
  82. Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63(3), 82–196.Google Scholar
  83. Von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2008). The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(6), 402–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2010). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1715), 2223–2232. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wafer, J. W. (1991). The taste of blood. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  86. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  89. Willard, A. K., & Norenzayan, A. (2013). Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose. Cognition, 129(2), 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wolff, S. E., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Vocal masculinity is a robust dominance signal in men. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64(10), 1673–1683.Google Scholar
  91. Wrangham, R. W., & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  92. Xygalatas, D. (2013). Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: a case study from Mauritius. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 3(2), 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., Fischer, R., Reddish, P., Skewes, J., Geertz, A. W., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Extreme rituals promote prosociality. Psychological Science, 24, 1602–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Yukl, G. (2008). How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. Leadeship Quarterly, 19(6), 708–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyMontclair State UniversityMontclairUSA

Personalised recommendations