Human Nature

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 517–537 | Cite as

Surnames and Social Mobility in England, 1170–2012

Article

Abstract

Using educational status in England from 1170 to 2012, we show that the rate of social mobility in any society can be estimated from knowledge of just two facts: the distribution over time of surnames in the society and the distribution of surnames among an elite or underclass. Such surname measures reveal that the typical estimate of parent–child correlations in socioeconomic measures in the range of 0.2–0.6 are misleading about rates of overall social mobility. Measuring education status through Oxbridge attendance suggests a generalized intergenerational correlation in status in the range of 0.70–0.90. Social status is more strongly inherited even than height. This correlation is unchanged over centuries. Social mobility in England in 2012 was little greater than in preindustrial times. Thus there are indications of an underlying social physics surprisingly immune to government intervention.

Keywords

Social mobility Intergenerational correlation Status inheritance 

References

  1. Ashton, T. S. (1977). Oxford’s Medieval alumni. Past & Present, 74, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, A., Maynard, A., & Trinder, C. (1983). Parents and children: Incomes in two generations. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, G., & Cummins, N. (2014a). Inequality and social mobility in the Industrial Revolution era. In R. Floud, J. Humphries, & P. Johnson (Eds.), The Cambridge economic history of modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, G., & Cummins, N. (2014b). What is the true rate of social mobility? Surnames and social mobility in England, 1830–2012. Economic Journal. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12165.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, G., & Cummins, N. (2014c). Malthus to modernity: England’s first demographic transition, 1760–1800. Journal of Population Economics. doi:10.1007/s00148-014-0509-9.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, G., Cummins, N., Diaz Vidal, D., Hao, Y., Ishii, T., Landes, Z., Marcin, D., Mo Jung, K., Marek, A., & Williams, K. (2014). The son also rises: 1,000 years of social mobility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, G., & Hamilton, G. (2006). Survival of the richest. The Malthusian mechanism in pre-industrIal England. Journal of Economic History, 66(3), 707–36.Google Scholar
  8. Corak. M. (2012) Inequality from generation to generation: The United States in comparison. In R. Rycroft (Ed), The economics of inequality, poverty, and discrimination in the 21st century. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  9. Dearden, L., Machin, S., & Reed, H. (1997). Intergenerational mobility in Britain. Economic Journal, 107, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ermisch, J., Francesconi, M., & Siedler, T. (2006). Intergenerational mobility and marital sorting. Economic Journal, 116, 659–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An enquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galton, F. (1889). Natural inheritance. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenstein, D. (1994). The junior members, 1900–1990: a profile. In B. Harrison (Ed.), The history of the University of Oxford, volume VIII. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Grönqvist, E., Öckert, B., Vlachos, J. (2011) The intergenerational transmission of cognitive and non-cognitive abilities. IFN Working Paper No. 884. Available at doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2050393.
  15. Harbury, C., & Hitchens, D. (1979). Inheritance and wealth inequality in Britain. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  16. Hertz, T., Jayasundera, T., Piraino, P., Selcuk, S., Smith, N., Verashchagina, A. (2007) The inheritance of educational inequality: International comparisons and fifty-year trends. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 7, Article 10.Google Scholar
  17. Keats-Rohan, K. S. B. (1999). Domesday people: A prosopography of persons occurring in English documents 1066–1166. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
  18. Long, J. (2013). The surprising social mobility of Victorian Britain. European Review of Economic History, 17(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pearson, K., & Lee, A. (1903). On the laws of inheritance in man, I: inheritance of physical characters. Biometrika, 2, 357–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schurer, K., & Woollard, M. (2000). 1881 Census for England and Wales, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man (enhanced version) [computer file]. Genealogical Society of Utah, Federation of Family History Societies, [original data producer(s)]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor]. SN: 4177, doi:10.5255/UKDA-SN-4177-1.
  21. Silventoinen, K., et al. (2003). Heritability of adult body height: a comparative study of twin cohorts in eight countries. Twin Research, 6, 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economic HistoryLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations