Impartial Institutions, Pathogen Stress and the Expanding Social Network
- 622 Downloads
Anthropologists have documented substantial cross-society variation in people’s willingness to treat strangers with impartial, universal norms versus favoring members of their local community. Researchers have proposed several adaptive accounts for these differences. One variant of the pathogen stress hypothesis predicts that people will be more likely to favor local in-group members when they are under greater infectious disease threat. The material security hypothesis instead proposes that institutions that permit people to meet their basic needs through impartial interactions with strangers reinforce a tendency toward impartiality, whereas people lacking such institutions must rely on local community members to meet their basic needs. Some studies have examined these hypotheses using self-reported preferences, but not with behavioral measures. We conducted behavioral experiments in eight diverse societies that measure individuals’ willingness to favor in-group members by ignoring an impartial rule. Consistent with the material security hypothesis, members of societies enjoying better-quality government services and food security show a stronger preference for following an impartial rule over investing in their local in-group. Our data show no support for the pathogen stress hypothesis as applied to favoring in-groups and instead suggest that favoring in-group members more closely reflects a general adaptive fit with social institutions that have arisen in each society.
KeywordsInstitutions Parochialism Insecurity Parasite Pathogen Cross-cultural analysis
DJH acknowledges support from the University of Chicago and Templeton Foundation New Science of Virtues Grant as well as support from the National Science Foundation grant BCS-1150813, jointly funded by the Programs in Cultural Anthropology, Social Psychology Program and Decision, Risk, and Management Sciences. JH acknowledges support from the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR). CE acknowledges the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant no. 100014_130127/1 on the Social Dynamics of Normative Behavior). TJ acknowledges the financial support of the Mozaiek grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and financial support of the Goldstone Research Fund.
- Banfield, E. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous preferences: the cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 75–111.Google Scholar
- Cashdan, E., and Steele, M. (2013). Pathogen prevalence, group bias, and collectivism in the standard cross-cultural sample. Human Nature:1–17.Google Scholar
- Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Chicago: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F., Tracer, D., & Ziker, J. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 327, 1480–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, H., Gurven, M., & Hill, K. (2005). A natural history of food sharing and cooperation: a review and a new multi-individual approach to the negotiation of norms. In H. Gintis, S. Bowles, R. Boyd, & E. Fehr (Eds.), Moral sentiments and material interests (pp. 75–113). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kranton, R. E. (1996). Reciprocal exchange: a self-sustaining system. The American Economic Review, 86, 830–851.Google Scholar
- Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2001). Institutional evolution in the Holocene: the rise of complex societies. Proceedings of the British Academcy, 110, 197–234.Google Scholar
- Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
- World Bank. 2011. World Bank indicators. Accessed online at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator.