Human Nature

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 181–199 | Cite as

Adaptive Content Biases in Learning about Animals across the Life Course

Article

Abstract

Prior work has demonstrated that young children in the US and the Ecuadorian Amazon preferentially remember information about the dangerousness of an animal over both its name and its diet. Here we explore if this bias is present among older children and adults in Fiji through the use of an experimental learning task. We find that a content bias favoring the preferential retention of danger and toxicity information continues to operate in older children, but that the magnitude of the bias diminishes with age and is absent in adults. We also find evidence that fitness costs likely impact the types of mistakes that participants make in their attributions of dangerousness and poisonousness. These results suggest that natural selection has shaped the way in which we learn and make inferences about unfamiliar animal species over ontogeny, and that future research is needed on how content biases may vary across the life course.

Keywords

Content bias Prepared learning Social learning Cultural transmission Danger Memory 

Supplementary material

12110_2014_9196_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
ESM(DOCX 23.7 kb)

References

  1. Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(04), 547–569.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, H. C. (2004). Cognitive development and the understanding of animal behavior. In B. Ellis & D. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind (pp. 438–467). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, H. C. (2005). Adaptations to predators and prey. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 200–223). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, H. C., & Broesch, J. (2012). Prepared social learning about animals in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(5), 499–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, J. L., & Nyhof, M. A. (2001). Spreading non-natural concepts: the role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition & Culture, 1(1), 69–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2010). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
  7. Bird, D., & Bliege Bird, R. (2002). Children on the reef. Human Nature, 13(2), 269–297. doi:10.1007/s12110-002-1010-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blurton Jones, N., & Konner, M. J. (1976). !Kung knowledge of animal behavior. In R. B. Lee & I. DeVore (Eds.), Studies of the !Kung San and their neighbors. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Boyer, P. (1998). Cognitive tracks of cultural inheritance: how evolved intuitive ontology governs cultural transmission. American Anthropologist, 100(4), 876–889. doi:10.1525/aa.1998.100.4.876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious concepts: cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations. Cognitive Science, 25, 535–564. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2504_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carver, R. P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48(3), 378–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chudek, M., Brosseau-Liard, P., Birch, S., & Henrich, J. (2012). Prestige-biased cultural learning: bystander’s differential attention to potential models influences children’s learning. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 46–56. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fessler, D. M. T. (2006). A burning desire: steps toward an evolutionary psychology of fire learning. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6, 429–451. doi:10.1163/156853706778554986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fessler, D. M. T., & Navarrete, C. D. (2003). Meat is good to taboo: dietary proscriptions as a product of the interaction of psychological mechanisms and social processes. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3, 1–40. doi:10.1163/156853703321598563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garcia, J., & Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 3, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardner, M. J., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.), 292(6522), 746–750. doi:10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006). The paranoid optimist: an integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 47–66. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heath, C., Bell, C., & Sternberg, E. (2001). Emotional selection in memes: the case of urban legends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1028–1041. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Henrich, J. (2009). The evolution of costly displays, cooperation, and religion: credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 244–260. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henrich, J., & Henrich, N. (2010). The evolution of cultural adaptations: Fijian food taboos protect against dangerous marine toxins. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1701), 3715–3724. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henrich, J., & McElreath, R. (2003). The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12(3), 123–135. doi:10.1002/evan.10110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liebenberg, L. (1990). The art of tracking: The origin of science. Where? South Africa: David Philip Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. McNamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I. (1992). Risk-sensitive foraging: a review of the theory. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 54(2), 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (Eds.). (1999). Folk biology. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.Google Scholar
  28. Mesoudi, A. (2009). How cultural evolutionary theory can inform social psychology and vice versa. Psychological Review, 116(4), 929–952. doi:10.1037/a0017062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mineka, S., & Cook, M. (1988). Social learning and the acquisition of snake fear in monkeys. In T. R. Zentall (Ed.), Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 51–72). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., Gregory, K. J., & Van Arsdall, J. E. (2009). Adaptive memory: fitness relevance and the hunter-gatherer mind. Psychological Science, 20(6), 740–746. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02356.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakahashi, W., Wakano, J. Y., & Henrich, J. (2012). Adaptive social learning strategies in temporally and spatially varying environments. Human Nature, 23, 386–418. doi:10.1007/s12110-012-9151-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Norenzayan, A., Atran, S., Faulknera, J., & Schaller, M. (2006). Memory and mystery: the cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive narratives. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 531–553. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483–522. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130(3), 466–478. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  36. Rendell, L., Fogarty, L., Hoppitt, W. J. E., Morgan, T. J. H., Webster, M. M., & Laland, K. N. (2011). Cognitive culture: theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(2), 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2001). Food, foragers, and folklore: the role of narrative in human subsistence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4), 221–240. doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(01)00063-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seligman, M. E. P. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77, 406–418. doi:10.1037/h0029790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Broesch
    • 1
  • H. Clark Barrett
    • 2
  • Joseph Henrich
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture and FPR-UCLA Center for Culture, Brain, and Development, Department of AnthropologyUCLALos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Departments of Psychology and EconomicsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations