We present a cross-cultural analysis showing that the presence of an active or moral High God in societies varies generally along a continuum from lesser to greater technological complexity and subsistence productivity. Foragers are least likely to have High Gods. Horticulturalists and agriculturalists are more likely. Pastoralists are most likely, though they are less easily positioned along the productivity continuum. We suggest that belief in moral High Gods was fostered by emerging leaders in societies dependent on resources that were difficult to manage and defend without group cooperation. These leaders used the concept of a supernatural moral enforcer to manipulate others into cooperating, which resulted in greater productivity. Reproductive success would accrue most to such leaders, but the average reproductive success of all individuals in the society would also increase with greater productivity. Supernatural enforcement of moral codes maintained social cohesion and allowed for further population growth, giving one society an advantage in competition with others.
KeywordsReligion Evolution Subsistence Foragers Pastoralists Supernatural punishment
The authors wish to thank Dr. Rie Goto, University of Cambridge, for valuable insight into the statistical analyses, and four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
- Bentley, G. R., Goldberg, T., & Jasienska, G. (1993). The fertility of agricultural and nonagricultural traditional societies. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 47, 269–281.Google Scholar
- Boone, J. L. (1992). Competition, conflict, and the development of social hierarchies. In E. A. Smith & B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Evolutionary ecology and human behavior (pp. 301–337). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Childe, V. G. (1950). The urban revolution. The Town Planning Review, 21, 3–17.Google Scholar
- Divale, W. (2007). Pre-coded variables for the standard cross-cultural sample. World Cultures (1–15). New York: York College, CUNY.Google Scholar
- Irons, W. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In R. Nesse (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 292–309). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Johnson, A. W., & Earle, T. (2000). The evolution of human societies: from foraging group to agrarian state (2nd ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Marlowe, F. W. (2011). The behavioral ecology of warfare. Keynote presented at the fortieth annual meeting of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research, February, Charleston, SC.Google Scholar
- Murdock, G. P. (1981). Atlas of world cultures. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
- Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R. (1980). Standard cross-cultural sample. In H. Barry & A. Schlegel (Eds.), Cross-cultural samples and codes (pp. 3–43). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
- Paige, K. E., & Paige, J. M. (1981). The politics of reproductive ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Roes, F. L. (1995). The size of societies, stratification, and belief in high gods supportive of human morality. Politics and the Life Sciences, 14, 73–77.Google Scholar
- Swanson, G. E. (1960). The birth of the gods: the origin of primitive belief. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar