Human Nature

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 89–97

Risk of Death or Life-Threatening Injury for Women with Children Not Sired by the Abuser

  • Emily J. Miner
  • Todd K. Shackelford
  • Carolyn Rebecca Block
  • Valerie G. Starratt
  • Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford
Article

Abstract

Women who are abused by their male intimate partners incur many costs, ranging in severity from fleeting physical pain to death. Previous research has linked the presence of children sired by a woman’s previous partner to increased risk of woman abuse and to increased risk of femicide. The current research extends this work by securing data from samples of 111 unabused women, 111 less severely abused women, 128 more severely abused women, and 26 victims of intimate partner femicide from the Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study to document an ordinal trend in the risk of experiencing more severe forms of violence for women who have children in the household sired by a previous partner. The discussion addresses two potential explanations for this trend and highlights directions for future research.

Keywords

Domestic violence Intimate partner abuse Intimate partner homicide Stepchildren 

References

  1. Anderson, K. G. (2000). The life histories of American stepfathers in evolutionary perspective. Human Nature, 11, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, C. R. (2000a). Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study, 1995–1998 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority [producer]. Ann Arbor: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].Google Scholar
  3. Block, C. R. (2000b). Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study: Risk of serious injury or death in intimate violence: A collaborative research project. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, NCJ 184511.Google Scholar
  4. Block, C. R. (2000c). Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study, 1995–1998: ICPSR 3002, Data collection instruments. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  5. Brewer, V. E., & Paulsen, D. J. (1999). A comparison of U.S. and Canadian findings on uxoricide risk for women with children sired by previous partners. Homicide Studies, 3, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brownridge, D. A. (2004). Male partner violence against women in stepfamilies: an analysis of risk and explanations in the Canadian milieu. Violence and Victims, 19, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet, 359, 1331–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., et al. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., McKeown, R. E., & King, M. J. (2000). Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: physical, sexual, and psychological battering. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 553–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1996). Evolutionary psychology and marital conflict: The relevance of stepchildren. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Feminist and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 9–28). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Daly, M., Singh, L. S., & Wilson, M. (1993). Children fathered by previous partners: a risk factor for violence against women. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 84, 209–210.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, M., Wiseman, K. A., & Wilson, M. I. (1997). Women with children sired by previous partners incur excess risk of uxoricide. Homicide Studies, 1, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emlen, S. T. (1997). The evolutionary study of human family systems. Social Science Information, 36, 563–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Figueredo, A. J., & McCloskey, L. A. (1993). Sex, money, and paternity: the evolution of domestic violence. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 353–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet, 368, 1260–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Romero, G. A., Kaighobadi, F., & Miner, E. J. (2008). Punishment, proprietariness, and paternity: men’s violence against women from an evolutionary perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heise, L. L., Raikes, A., Watts, C. H., & Zwi, A. B. (1994). Violence against women: a neglected public health issue in less developed countries. Social Science & Medicine, 39, 1165–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mantel, N. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 690–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mantel, N., & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748.Google Scholar
  21. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vest, J. R., Catlin, T. K., Chen, J. J., & Brownson, R. C. (2002). Multistate analysis of factor associated with intimate partner violence. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 22, 156–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1996). Male sexual proprietariness and violence against women. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily J. Miner
    • 1
  • Todd K. Shackelford
    • 2
  • Carolyn Rebecca Block
    • 3
  • Valerie G. Starratt
    • 4
  • Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Oakland UniversityRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Illinois Criminal Justice Information AuthorityChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Nova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations