Human Nature

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 377–393

Female Mobility and Postmarital Kin Access in a Patrilocal Society

Article

Abstract

Across a wide variety of cultural settings, kin have been shown to play an important role in promoting women’s reproductive success. Patrilocal postmarital residence is a potential hindrance to maintaining these support networks, raising the question: how do women preserve and foster relationships with their natal kin when propinquity is disrupted? Using census and interview data from the Himba, a group of semi-nomadic African pastoralists, I first show that although women have reduced kin propinquity after marriage, more than half of married women are visiting with their kin at a given time. Mobility recall data further show that married women travel more than unmarried women, and that women consistently return to stay with kin around the time of giving birth. Divorce and death of a spouse also trigger a return to living with kin, leading to a cumulative pattern of kin coresidence across the lifespan. These data suggest that patrilocality may be less of a constraint on female kin support than has been previously assumed.

Keywords

Postmarital residence Himba Cooperative breeding 

References

  1. Alvarez, H. P. (2004). Residence groups among hunter-gatherers: a view of the claims and evidence for patrilocal bands. In B. Chapais & C. M. Berman (Eds.), Kinship and behavior in primates (pp. 420–442). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blurton Jones, N. G., Hawkes, K., & O’Connell, J. F. (2005). Hadza grandmothers as helpers: Residence data. In E. Voland, A. Chasiotis, & W. Schiefenhoevel (Eds.), Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life (pp. 160–176). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bollig, M. (2006). Risk management in a hazardous environment: A comparative study of two pastoral societies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988). Kipsigis bridewealth payments. In L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 65–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Milton, M. (1985). Factors affecting infant care in the Kipsigis. Journal of Anthropological Research, 41, 231–262.Google Scholar
  6. Borgerhoff Mulder, M., George-Cramer, M., Eshelman, J., & Ortolani, A. (2001). A study of East African kinship and marriage using a phlogenetically based comparative method. American Anthropologist, 103, 1059–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Fazzio, I., Irons, W., McElreath, R., Bowles, S., Bell, A., et al. (2010). Pastoralism and wealth inequality. Current Anthropology, 51, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dugatkin, L. A. (1997). Cooperation among animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ember, M., & Ember, C. (1971). The conditions favoring matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. American Anthropologist, 73, 571–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emlen, S. T. (1991). The evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 301–337). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
  12. Flinn, M. V. (1988). Mate guarding in a Caribbean village. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fricke, T., Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1993). Marriage, social inequality, and women’s contact with their natal families in alliance societies: two Tamang examples. American Anthropologist, 95, 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson, G. (1956). Double descent and its correlates among the Herero of Ngamiland. American Anthropologist, 58, 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson, G. D. (1977). Himba epochs. History in Africa, 4, 67–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibson, M. A., & Mace, R. (2005). Helpful grandmothers in rural Ethiopia: a study of the effect of kin on child survival and growth. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffin, A. S., & West, S. A. (2003). Kin discrimination and the benefit of helping in cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Science, 302, 634–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrell, S. (1997). Human families. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (1997). Hadza women’s time allocation, offspring provisioning and the evolution of long postmenopausal life spans. Current Anthropology, 38, 551–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill, K. R., Walker, R. S., et al. (2011). Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science, 331, 1286–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hurtado, A. M., Hawkes, K., Hill, K., & Kaplan, H. (1985). Female subsistence strategies among Ache hunter-gatherers of eastern Paraguay. Human Ecology, 13, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Judd, E. R. (1989). Niangjia: Chinese women and their natal families. Journal of Asian Studies, 48, 525–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaberry, P. M. (2003). Aboriginal woman: Sacred and profane. London: Routledge (Originally published in 1939).Google Scholar
  25. Kramer, K. L. (2005). Children’s help and the pace of reproduction: cooperative breeding in humans. Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kramer, K. L. (2010). Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lamphere, L. (1974). Strategies, cooperation, and conflict among women in domestic groups. In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, culture and society (pp. 97–112). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, R. B. (1962). !Kung spatial organization: an ecological and historical perspective. Human Ecology, 1, 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, R. B., & DeVore, I. (Eds.). (1968). Man the hunter. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  30. Leslie, P. W., Campbell, K. L., Campbell, B. C., Kigondu, C. S., & Kirumbi, L. W. (1999). Fecundity and fertility. In M. A. Little & P. W. Leslie (Eds.), Turkana herders of the dry savanna: Ecology and biobehavioral response of nomads to an uncertain environment (pp. 248–278). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mace, R., & Sear, R. (2005). Are humans cooperative breeders? In E. Voland, A. Chasiotis, & W. Schiefenhoevel (Eds.), Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life (pp. 143–159). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Malan, J. S. (1973). Double descent among the Himba of South West Africa. Cimbabasia (B), 2, 81–112.Google Scholar
  33. Malan, J. S. (1995). Peoples of Namibia. Pretoria: Rhino Press.Google Scholar
  34. Marlowe, F. W. (2000). Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes, 51, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marlowe, F. (2003). A critical period for provisioning by Hadza men: implications for pair bonding. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Marital residence among foragers. Current Anthropology, 45, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Panter-Brick, C. (1989). Motherhood and subsistence work: the Tamang of rural Nepal. Human Ecology, 17, 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pearson, W., & Hendrix, L. (1979). Divorce and the status of women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Picciano, M. F. (2003). Pregnancy and lactation: physiological adjustments, nutritional requirements and the role of dietary supplements. Journal of Nutrition, 133, 19975–20025.Google Scholar
  40. Scelza, B. A. (2011). Female choice and extra-pair paternity in a traditional human population. Biology Letters. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0478.
  41. Scelza, B. A., & Bliege Bird, R. (2008). Group structure and female cooperative networks in Australia’s Western Desert. Human Nature, 19, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turke, P. W. (1988). Helpers at the nest: Childcare networks on Ifaluk. In L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 173–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Voland, E., & Beise, J. (2005). “The husband’s mother is the devil in the house”: Data on the impact of the mother-in-law on stillbirth mortality in historical Krummhorn (1750–1874) and some thoughts on the evolution of postgenerative female life. In E. Voland, A. Chasiotis, & W. Schiefenhoevel (Eds.), Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life (pp. 239–255). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wood, B., & Marlowe, F. W. (2011). Dynamics of postmarital residence among the Hadza: a kin selection model. Human Nature, 22, 128–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCLA Department of AnthropologyLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations