Human Nature

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 428–442 | Cite as

Living a Fast Life

The Dark Triad and Life History Theory
Article

Abstract

The current research applied a mid-level evolutionary theory that has been successfully employed across numerous animal species—life history theory—in an attempt to understand the Dark Triad personality trait cluster (narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism). In Study 1 (N = 246), a measure of life history strategy was correlated with psychopathy, but unexpectedly with neither Machiavellianism nor narcissism. Study 2 (N = 321) replicated this overall pattern of results using longer, traditional measures of the Dark Triad traits and alternative, future-discounting indicators of life history strategy (a smaller-sooner, larger-later monetary dilemma and self-reported risk-taking behaviors). Additional findings suggested two sources of shared variance across the Dark Triad traits: confidence in predicting future outcomes and openness to short-term mating.

Keywords

Dark triad Life history theory Future discounting Sex differences 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Laura Madson for help preparing this manuscript. The authors also thank Chelsea Adams and Lauren Lopez for data entry.

References

  1. Brumbach, B. H., Figueredo, A. J., & Ellis, B. J. (2009). Effects of harsh and unpredictable environments in adolescence on development of life history strategies: a longitudinal test of an evolutionary model. Human Nature, 20, 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schaffer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis, B. (1988). Criminal behavior and r/K selection: an extension of gene-based evolutionary theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellis, B., & Garber, J. (2000). Psychosocial antecedents in variation in girls’ pubertal timing: maternal depression, stepfather presence, and marital and family stress. Child Development, 71, 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Figueredo, A. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2010). Aggression, risk-taking, and alternative life history strategies: The behavioral ecology of social deviance. In M. Frias-Armenta and V. Corral- Verdugo (Eds.), Bio-psycho-social perspectives on interpersonal violence (pp. 3–28). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Sefcek, J. A., Kirsner, B. R., & Jacobs, W. J. (2005). The K-factor: individual differences in life history strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1349–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., et al. (2006). Consilience and life history theory: from genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26, 243–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., & Schneider, S. M. R. (2007). The K-factor, covitality, and personality: a psychometric test of life history theory. Human Nature, 18, 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time-discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geary, D. C. (2005). The origin of the mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington: American Psychological Association Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gladden, P. R., Figueredo, A. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2009). Life history strategy, psychopathic attitudes, personality, and general intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 270–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green, L., Myerson, J., Lichtman, D., Rosen, S., & Fry, A. (1996). Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: the role of age and income. Psychology and Aging, 11, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hill, K. (1993). Life history theory and evolutionary anthropology. Evolutionary Anthropology, 2, 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jonason, P. K., & Kavanagh, P. (2010). The dark side of love: the Dark Triad and love styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 606–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jonason, P. K., & Tost, J. (2010). I just cannot control myself: the Dark Triad and self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 611–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22, 420–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. W., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The Dark Triad: facilitating short-term mating in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Buss, D. M. (2010a). The Dark Triad as a short-term mating strategy: implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010b). Who is James Bond? The Dark Triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111–120.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2007). Mating effort as a predictor of smoking in a college sample. Current Research in Social Psychology, 12, 186–195.Google Scholar
  26. Kirby, K. N., & Marakrovic, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychological Review, 3, 100–104.Google Scholar
  27. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. London, H. (1973). Psychology of the persuader. Morristown: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  29. MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1967). The theory of island geography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: an integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 523–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olderbak, S. G., & Figueredo, A. J. (2009). Predicting romantic relationship satisfaction from life history strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 604–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paulhus, D. L., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. (in press). Manual for the self-report psychopathy scale (SRP). Toronto: Multi-Heath Systems.Google Scholar
  36. Raskin, R. N., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Read, D., & Read, N. L. (2004). Time-discounting over the lifetime. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 27, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rushton, J. P. (1985). Differential K theory: the sociobiology of individual and group differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rushton, J. P. (1987). Toward a theory of human multiple birthing: sociobiology and r/K reproductive strategies. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 36, 289–296.Google Scholar
  41. Rushton, J. P. (1995). Race, evolution, and behavior: A life history perspective. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  42. Rushton, J. P. (2004). Placing intelligence into an evolutionary framework of how g fits into the r-K matrix of life history traits including longevity. Intelligence, 32, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2004). Evolutionary life history perspective on rape. In C. Crawford & C. Salmon (Eds.), Evolutionary psychology, public policy, and personal decisions (pp. 249–274). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Trafimow, D. (2003). Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: surprising insights from Bayes’s theorem. Psychological Review, 110, 526–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  47. Vernon, P. A., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A. (2008). A behavioral genetics investigation of the Dark Triad and the Big 5. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wanous, J. P., & Reichers, A. E. (1996). Estimating the reliability of a single-item measure. Psychological Reports, 78, 631–634.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2004). Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future? Proceedings from the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271(Suppl. 4), S177–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter K. Jonason
    • 1
  • Bryan L. Koenig
    • 2
  • Jeremy Tost
    • 3
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of South AlabamaMobileUSA
  2. 2.Singapore Agency for Science, Technology, and ResearchSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA

Personalised recommendations