Human Nature

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 330–354 | Cite as

Interpersonal Aggression among Aka Hunter-Gatherers of the Central African Republic

Assessing the Effects of Sex, Strength, and Anger
  • Nicole Hess
  • Courtney Helfrecht
  • Edward Hagen
  • Aaron Sell
  • Barry Hewlett
Article

Abstract

Sex differences in physical and indirect aggression have been found in many societies but, to our knowledge, have not been studied in a population of hunter-gatherers. Among Aka foragers of the Central African Republic we tested whether males physically aggressed more than females, and whether females indirectly aggressed more than males, as has been seen in other societies. We also tested predictions of an evolutionary theory of physical strength, anger, and physical aggression. We found a large male bias in physical aggression. Controlling for anger, we found an adult female bias in indirect aggression. Physical strength predicted anger, which predicted hitting, although results were sensitive to the inclusion or exclusion of traditional healers, who were physically and emotionally distinct from other Aka. With some important caveats, our results generally support the predicted sex differences in physical aggression and indirect aggression, and the predicted relationships among anger, strength, and aggression.

Keywords

Physical aggression Indirect aggression Social norms Sex differences Foragers 

References

  1. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: a meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, J., & Coyne, S. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 212–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, J., & Thanzami, V. (2007). The relation between physical aggression, size and strength among a sample of young Indian men. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 627–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bahuchet, S. (1985). Les pygmées Aka et la forêt Centrafricaine. Paris: Selaf.Google Scholar
  6. Bahuchet, S. (1990). Food sharing among the pygmies of Central Africa. African Study Monographs, 11(1), 27–53.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Barry, H., Josephson, L., Lauer, E., & Marshall, C. (1976). Traits inculcated in childhood: cross-cultural codes 5. Ethnology, 15, 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowles, S. (2009). Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behavior? Science, 324(5932), 1293–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203–252.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, A., Muncer, S., Guy, A., & Banim, M. (1996). Social representations of aggression: crossing the sex barrier. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chagnon, N. A. (1997). Yanomamö (5th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  14. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  15. Draper, P. (1978). The learning environment for aggression and anti-social behavior among the !Kung (Kalahari Desert, Botswana, Africa). In A. Montagu (Ed.), Learning non-aggression: The experience of non-literate societies (pp. 31–53). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ember, C. R. (1978). Myths about hunter-gatherers. Ethnology, 17(4), 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (1994). War, socialization, and interpersonal violence: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(4), 620–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (1997). Violence in the ethnographic record. In D. L. Martin & D. W. Frayer (Eds.), Troubled times: Violence and warfare in the past (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  20. Fouts, H. N., & Lamb, M. E. (2009). Cultural and developmental variation in toddlers’ interactions with other children in two small-scale societies in Central Africa. European Journal of Developmental Science, 3, 259–277.Google Scholar
  21. Gat, A. (1999). The pattern of fighting in simple, small-scale, prestate societies. Journal of Anthropological Research, 55, 563–583.Google Scholar
  22. Hess, N. H. (2006). Informational warfare: The evolution of female coalitions and gossip. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  23. Hess, N. H. and Hagen, E. H. (n.d.) The impact of resource value, resource contestedness, and coalitions on gossiping. Under review.Google Scholar
  24. Hewlett, B. S. (1991). Intimate fathers: The nature and context of Aka pygmy paternal infant care. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hewlett, B. S. (1996). Cultural diversity among African pygmies. In S. Kent (Ed.), Cultural diversity among twentieth-century foragers (pp. 215–244). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hewlett, B. S., Lamb, M. E., Levendecker, B., & Scholmerich, A. (2000). Internal working models, trust, and sharing among foragers. Current Anthropology, 41(2), 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hewlett, B. S., van de Koppel, J. M. H., & van de Koppel, M. (1986). Causes of death among Aka pygmies of the Central African Republic. In L. L. Cavalli-Sforza (Ed.), African pygmies (pp. 45–63). Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
  28. Hewlett, B. S., & Hewlett, B. L. (2008). A biocultural approach to sex, love, and intimacy in Central African foragers and farmers. In W. Jankowiak (Ed.), Intimacies: Love and sex across cultures (pp. 37–64). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  30. Kelly, R. (2000). Warless societies and the origin of war. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  31. Levy, R. I. (1978). Tahitian gentleness and redundant controls. In A. Montagu (Ed.), Learning non-aggression: The experience of non-literate societies (pp. 222–235). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. McCall, G. S., & Shields, N. (2008). Examining the evidence from small-scale societies and early prehistory and implications for modern theories of aggression and violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meehan, C. L. (2005). Multiple caregiving and its effect on maternal behavior among the Aka foragers and the Ngandu farmers of Central Africa. PhD dissertation, Washington State University.Google Scholar
  34. Montagu, A. (Ed.). (1978). Learning non-aggression: The experience of non-literate societies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sell, A. (2006). Regulating welfare tradeoff ratios: Three tests of an evolutionary-computational model of human anger. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  36. Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2008). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Biology, 276, 575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35), 15073–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shannon, D. (1996). Early infant care among the Aka. PhD dissertation, Washington State University.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, R. L., Rose, A. J., & Schwartz-Mette, R. A. (2009). Relational and overt aggression in childhood and adolescence: clarifying mean-level gender differences and associations with peer acceptance. Social Development. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00541.x.Google Scholar
  40. Thomas, E. M. (1958). The harmless people. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  41. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  42. Turnbull, C. M. (1965). The Mbuti pygmies: An ethnographic survey. New York: Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History (vol. 50, part 3).Google Scholar
  43. Turnbull, C. M. (1978). The politics of non-aggression (Zaire). In A. Montagu (Ed.), Learning non-aggression: The experience of non-literate societies (pp. 161–221). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Walker, P. L. (2001). A bioarchaeological perspective on the history of violence. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wiessner, P. (2005). Norm enforcement among the Ju/’hoansi Bushmen: a case of strong reciprocity? Human Nature, 16, 115–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wrangham, R. W., Wilson, M. L., & Mueller, M. N. (2006). Comparative rates of violence in chimpanzees and humans. Primates, 47, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole Hess
    • 1
  • Courtney Helfrecht
    • 2
  • Edward Hagen
    • 1
  • Aaron Sell
    • 3
  • Barry Hewlett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWashington State UniversityVancouverUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations