Who Cares About Marrying a Rich Man? Intelligence and Variation in Women’s Mate Preferences
- 774 Downloads
Although robust sex differences are abundant in men and women’s mating psychology, there is a considerable degree of overlap between the two as well. In an effort to understand where and when this overlap exists, the current study provides an exploration of within-sex variation in women’s mate preferences. We hypothesized that women’s intelligence, given an environment where women can use that intelligence to attain educational and career opportunities, would be: (1) positively related to their willingness to engage in short-term sexual relationships, (2) negatively related to their desire for qualities in a partner that indicated wealth and status, and (3) negatively related to their endorsement of traditional gender roles in romantic relationships. These predictions were supported. Results suggest that intelligence may be one important individual difference influencing women’s mate preferences.
KeywordsFemale mate preferences Intelligence Within-sex variation Sociosexuality Gender roles
We would like to thank Bobbi Low and four anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.
- Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Buss, D. M. (1996). Sexual conflict: Evolutionary insights into feminism and the “battle of the sexes. In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 296–318). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The evolution of parental care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37, 554–558.Google Scholar
- Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. I. (1990). Kaufman brief intelligence test manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproduction strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75–91.Google Scholar
- Simpson, J. A., & Lapaglia, J. (2006). An evolutionary account of strategic pluralism in human mating changes in mate preferences across the menstrual cycle. In J. P. Forgas, M. G. Haselton, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The evolution of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and social cognition (pp. 161–177). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Townsend, J. M., & Roberts, L. W. (1993). Gender differences in mate preference among law students: Divergence and convergence of criteria. Journal of Psychology, 127(5), 507–528.Google Scholar
- Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar